Trial Outcomes & Findings for Assessment of Fluticasone Propionate on Ocular Allergy Symptoms (NCT NCT01817790)
NCT ID: NCT01817790
Last Updated: 2014-04-03
Results Overview
The Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores (eye itching/burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness), each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. Subjects completed rTOSS in the evening (PM rTOSS; 12 hours post morning nasal spray use) and once in the morning (AM score: prior to nasal spray use). Daily (i.e. during one dosing interval) rTOSS is defined as the average of the PM rTOSS and the AM rTOSS of the next day prior to AM dosing. The mean change from baseline in (daily, AM, PM) TOSS was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days; from Day 0 PM to Day 14 AM) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
626 participants
Baseline to 14 days
2014-04-03
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited at 6 clinical sites in the US.
Of the 855 participants screened, 626 were randomized in the study. Of the 229 participants not randomized into the study, 151 did not meet the study criteria; 3 developed AEs; 10 were lost to follow-up; 4 violated protocol; 28 withdrew consent; and the remaining 33 were not randomized for other reasons.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
Two sprays of Fluticasone propionate nasal spray (50 mcg/spray) per nostril to be administered in morning (Total dose 200 mcg).
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
314
|
312
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
310
|
304
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
Two sprays of Fluticasone propionate nasal spray (50 mcg/spray) per nostril to be administered in morning (Total dose 200 mcg).
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Other: Could not attend appointment
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Assessment of Fluticasone Propionate on Ocular Allergy Symptoms
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Two sprays of Fluticasone propionate nasal spray (50 mcg/spray) per nostril to be administered in morning (Total dose 200 mcg).
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Total
n=626 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
40.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.55 • n=93 Participants
|
40.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.36 • n=4 Participants
|
40.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.47 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
212 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
201 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
413 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
102 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
111 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
213 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
The Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores (eye itching/burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness), each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. Subjects completed rTOSS in the evening (PM rTOSS; 12 hours post morning nasal spray use) and once in the morning (AM score: prior to nasal spray use). Daily (i.e. during one dosing interval) rTOSS is defined as the average of the PM rTOSS and the AM rTOSS of the next day prior to AM dosing. The mean change from baseline in (daily, AM, PM) TOSS was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days; from Day 0 PM to Day 14 AM) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS)
|
-0.91 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.625
|
-0.63 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.525
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
rTOSS is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores (eye itching/ burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness), each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For AM rToss, subjects completed rTOSS in the morning (AM score: prior to nasal spray use). The mean change from baseline in AM rTOSS was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in AM rTOSS
|
-0.96 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.627
|
-0.68 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.573
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
rTOSS is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores (eye itching/ burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness), each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For PM rTOSS, subjects completed rTOSS in the evening, 12 hours post morning nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in PM rTOSS was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in PM rTOSS
|
-0.87 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.735
|
-0.60 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.577
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
The AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye itching/burning using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the morning, prior to nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye itching and burning) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Itching/Burning
|
-0.35 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.581
|
-0.28 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.553
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
The PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye itching/burning using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the evening, 12 hours post morning nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye itching and burning) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Itching/Burning
|
-0.33 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.626
|
-0.24 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.554
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
The AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye tearing/watering using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the morning, prior to nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye tearing/watering) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Tearing/Watering
|
-0.35 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.596
|
-0.24 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.589
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
The PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye tearing/watering using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the evening, 12 hours post morning nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye tearing/watering) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Tearing/Watering
|
-0.32 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.653
|
-0.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.586
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
The AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye redness using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the morning, prior to nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye redness) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Redness
|
-0.26 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.597
|
-0.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.613
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
The PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye redness using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the evening, 12 hours post morning nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye redness) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Redness
|
-0.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.628
|
-0.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.635
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
Instantaneous total ocular symptom scores (iTOSS) assessments are self perceived evaluation of symptom severity immediately before the dose (how the subject feels at that point in time). iTOSS (possible score of 0-9) is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores for eye itching/burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe. Mean changes from baseline were calculated as treatment period iTOSS minus baseline iTOSS.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in AM Pre-dose Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS)
|
-0.80 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.443
|
-0.55 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.531
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
The rNCSS is a participant perceived evaluation of overall congestion symptom severity (evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe) which was completed once in the evening (PM), and once in the morning (AM). rNCSS is defined as the average of the PM rNCSS and the AM rNCSS of the next day prior to AM dosing. The mean change from baseline in rNCSS (daily, AM, PM)was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days; from Day 0 PM to Day 14 AM) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Nasal Congestion Symptom Score (rNCSS)
|
-0.34 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.547
|
-0.20 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.443
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 14Population: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population. In this outcome measure, in Fluticasone propionate group 313/314 participants, and in the placebo group 309/312 participants provided responses.
Overall response to therapy assessment was done using a 7-point categorical scale in which participants rated their response to therapy as follows: +3 = Significantly Improved; +2 = Moderately Improved; +1 = Mildly Improved; 0 = No Change; -1= Mildly Worse; -2 = Moderately Worse; -3 = Significantly Worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=313 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=309 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
End-of-treatment Assessment of Response to Therapy for Ocular Symptoms
Significantly improved
|
22 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
End-of-treatment Assessment of Response to Therapy for Ocular Symptoms
Moderately Improved
|
76 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
|
End-of-treatment Assessment of Response to Therapy for Ocular Symptoms
Mildly Improved
|
79 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
|
End-of-treatment Assessment of Response to Therapy for Ocular Symptoms
No change
|
81 Participants
|
97 Participants
|
|
End-of-treatment Assessment of Response to Therapy for Ocular Symptoms
Mildly Worse
|
21 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
End-of-treatment Assessment of Response to Therapy for Ocular Symptoms
Moderatly Worse
|
24 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
End-of-treatment Assessment of Response to Therapy for Ocular Symptoms
Significantly Worse
|
10 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
Conjunctival redness was evaluated as a clinical sign of SAR by the investigator. Scoring of severity was rated according to a 4-point scale: 0 = normal; 1 = Slightly pink; 2 = Moderately pink, some dilation; 3 = Intense red vessels, dilated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Objective Assessment of Conjunctival Redness
|
-0.20 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.815
|
-0.15 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.736
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population. For analysis of nose symptoms, eye symptoms, and other symptoms, data of one participant each from the two groups are unavailable.
MiniRQLQ is a 14-item, disease-specific instrument for assessing the impact of allergic rhinitis on activities of daily living and overall well-being. It measures five domains of functional impairment that are most important to subjects with SAR: practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and other symptoms. Participants scored their degree of impairment on a seven-point scale. (0 - 6). Mini RQLQ final score is the average of sub-scales, ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 6 (worst possible outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=311 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Changes From Baseline in Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniRQLQ) Scores
|
-0.98 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.311
|
-0.49 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.091
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
MiniRQLQ is a 14-item, disease-specific instrument for assessing the impact of allergic rhinitis on activities of daily living and overall well-being. Activity limitations is one of the domains of Mini RQLQ scores. Participants scored their degree of impairment on a seven-point scale (0 = not troubled, 6 = extremely troubled).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=311 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual MiniRQLQ Scores: Domain - Activities
|
-0.93 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.384
|
-0.39 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.269
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.
MiniRQLQ is a 14-item, disease-specific instrument for assessing the impact of allergic rhinitis on activities of daily living and overall well-being. 'Practical Problems' is one of the domains of Mini RQLQ scores. Participants scored their degree of impairment on a seven-point scale (0 = not troubled, 6 = extremely troubled).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=311 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual MiniRQLQ Scores: Domain - Practical Problems
|
-1.04 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.476
|
-0.57 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.258
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population. For analysis of nose symptoms, data of one participant each from the two groups are unavailable.
MiniRQLQ is a 14-item, disease-specific instrument for assessing the impact of allergic rhinitis on activities of daily living and overall well-being. "Nose Symptoms" is one of the domains of Mini RQLQ scores. Participants scored their degree of impairment on a seven-point scale (0 = not troubled, 6 = extremely troubled).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=313 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=310 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual MiniRQLQ Scores: Domain - Nose Symptoms
|
-1.09 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.456
|
-0.50 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.257
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population. For analysis of eye symptoms, data of one participant each from the two groups are unavailable.
MiniRQLQ is a 14-item, disease-specific instrument for assessing the impact of allergic rhinitis on activities of daily living and overall well-being. "Eye Symptoms" is one of the domains of Mini RQLQ scores. Participants scored their degree of impairment on a seven-point scale (0 = not troubled, 6 = extremely troubled).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=313 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=310 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual MiniRQLQ Scores: Domain - Eye Symptoms
|
-0.98 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.512
|
-0.55 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.284
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 daysPopulation: All subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population. For analysis of "other symptoms", data of one participant each from the two groups are unavailable.
MiniRQLQ is a 14-item, disease-specific instrument for assessing the impact of allergic rhinitis on activities of daily living and overall well-being. "Other Symptoms" is one of the domains of Mini RQLQ scores. Participants scored their degree of impairment on a seven-point scale (0 = not troubled, 6 = extremely troubled).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=313 Participants
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray. Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=310 Participants
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual MiniRQLQ Scores: Domain - Other Symptoms
|
-0.89 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.607
|
-0.48 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.294
|
Adverse Events
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
Placebo Nasal Spray
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
n=314 participants at risk
Two sprays of Fluticasone propionate nasal spray (50 mcg/spray) per nostril to be administered in morning (Total dose 200 mcg).
|
Placebo Nasal Spray
n=312 participants at risk
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/314 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.32%
1/312 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.32%
1/314 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.64%
2/312 • Number of events 2 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Thirst
|
0.32%
1/314 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/312 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/314 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.64%
2/312 • Number of events 2 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal Viral
|
0.32%
1/314 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/312 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/314 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.32%
1/312 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.64%
2/314 • Number of events 2 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/312 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/314 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.32%
1/312 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/314 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.32%
1/312 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory Tract Congestion
|
0.00%
0/314 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.32%
1/312 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat Irritation
|
0.32%
1/314 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/312 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.32%
1/314 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/312 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/314 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.32%
1/312 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.32%
1/314 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/312 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/314 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.32%
1/312 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.32%
1/314 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/312 • Participants were followed for the duration of study, an average of 3 weeks.
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER