Trial Outcomes & Findings for Alisertib With and Without Rituximab in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NCT NCT01812005)
NCT ID: NCT01812005
Last Updated: 2018-06-06
Results Overview
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
14 participants
Up to 18 weeks (6 courses)
2018-06-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort A (Alisertib, Rituximab)
Patients receive alisertib PO BID on days 1-7. Patients unable to achieve CR after course 4 also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 5-12. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
Cohort B (Alisertib, Rituximab)
Patients receive alisertib as in Cohort A. Patients achieving SD or asymptomatic progressive disease after 2 courses also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 3-10. Patients unable to achieve CR by course 4, receive rituximab as in Cohort A. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Alisertib With and Without Rituximab in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort A (Alisertib, Rituximab)
n=1 Participants
Patients receive alisertib PO BID on days 1-7. Patients unable to achieve CR after course 4 also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 5-12. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
Cohort B (Alisertib, Rituximab)
n=13 Participants
Patients receive alisertib as in Cohort A. Patients achieving SD or asymptomatic progressive disease after 2 courses also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 3-10. Patients unable to achieve CR by course 4, receive rituximab as in Cohort A. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
Total
n=14 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
77 years
n=5 Participants
|
58 years
n=7 Participants
|
67.5 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
1 patients
n=5 Participants
|
13 patients
n=7 Participants
|
14 patients
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 18 weeks (6 courses)Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A (Alisertib, Rituximab)
n=1 Participants
Patients receive alisertib PO BID on days 1-7. Patients unable to achieve CR after course 4 also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 5-12. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
Cohort B (Alisertib, Rituximab)
n=13 Participants
Patients receive alisertib as in Cohort A. Patients achieving SD or asymptomatic progressive disease after 2 courses also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 3-10. Patients unable to achieve CR by course 4, receive rituximab as in Cohort A. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best Overall Response Rate (ORR) to Alisertib Alone
|
0 percentage of patients
95% Confidence Interval was incalculable due to an insufficient number of events
|
15 percentage of patients
Interval 2.0 to 45.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks (2 courses)Population: 2 course endpoints only apply to Cohort B, since Cohort B only received 2 courses of the interested drug
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A (Alisertib, Rituximab)
Patients receive alisertib PO BID on days 1-7. Patients unable to achieve CR after course 4 also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 5-12. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
Cohort B (Alisertib, Rituximab)
n=13 Participants
Patients receive alisertib as in Cohort A. Patients achieving SD or asymptomatic progressive disease after 2 courses also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 3-10. Patients unable to achieve CR by course 4, receive rituximab as in Cohort A. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
|
—
|
8 percentage of patients
Interval 0.0 to 36.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeks (4 courses)Population: Data were not collected from the single participant in the "Cohort A (Alisertib, Rituximab)" Arm/Group therfore the 95% Confidence Interval was incalculable due to an insufficient number of events
95% binomial confidence intervals calculated.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 weeks (6 courses)Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A (Alisertib, Rituximab)
n=1 Participants
Patients receive alisertib PO BID on days 1-7. Patients unable to achieve CR after course 4 also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 5-12. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
Cohort B (Alisertib, Rituximab)
n=13 Participants
Patients receive alisertib as in Cohort A. Patients achieving SD or asymptomatic progressive disease after 2 courses also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 3-10. Patients unable to achieve CR by course 4, receive rituximab as in Cohort A. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate(ORR)
|
0 percentage of patients
|
15 percentage of patients
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks (2 courses)Population: 2 course endpoints only apply to Cohort B, since Cohort B only received 2 courses of the interested drug
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A (Alisertib, Rituximab)
Patients receive alisertib PO BID on days 1-7. Patients unable to achieve CR after course 4 also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 5-12. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
Cohort B (Alisertib, Rituximab)
n=13 Participants
Patients receive alisertib as in Cohort A. Patients achieving SD or asymptomatic progressive disease after 2 courses also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 3-10. Patients unable to achieve CR by course 4, receive rituximab as in Cohort A. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
|---|---|---|
|
Complete Response Rate (CR)
|
—
|
0 percentage of patients
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeks (4 courses)Population: data was not collected for participants in Cohort B (Alisertib, Rituximab)
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A (Alisertib, Rituximab)
n=1 Participants
Patients receive alisertib PO BID on days 1-7. Patients unable to achieve CR after course 4 also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 5-12. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
Cohort B (Alisertib, Rituximab)
Patients receive alisertib as in Cohort A. Patients achieving SD or asymptomatic progressive disease after 2 courses also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 3-10. Patients unable to achieve CR by course 4, receive rituximab as in Cohort A. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
|---|---|---|
|
Complete Response Rate
|
NA percentage of patients
95% Confidence Interval was incalculable due to an insufficient number of events
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from study entry to the time of death due to any cause, assessed up to 1 yearPopulation: data was not collected for participants in Cohort A
Graphically summarized using the methods of Kaplan and Meier.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A (Alisertib, Rituximab)
Patients receive alisertib PO BID on days 1-7. Patients unable to achieve CR after course 4 also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 5-12. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
Cohort B (Alisertib, Rituximab)
n=13 Participants
Patients receive alisertib as in Cohort A. Patients achieving SD or asymptomatic progressive disease after 2 courses also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 3-10. Patients unable to achieve CR by course 4, receive rituximab as in Cohort A. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
|
—
|
3.1 months
Interval 1.7 to 27.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from study entry to the time of progression and/or death, assessed up to 1 yearGraphically summarized using the methods of Kaplan and Meier.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A (Alisertib, Rituximab)
n=1 Participants
Patients receive alisertib PO BID on days 1-7. Patients unable to achieve CR after course 4 also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 5-12. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
Cohort B (Alisertib, Rituximab)
n=13 Participants
Patients receive alisertib as in Cohort A. Patients achieving SD or asymptomatic progressive disease after 2 courses also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 3-10. Patients unable to achieve CR by course 4, receive rituximab as in Cohort A. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
alisertib: Given PO
rituximab: Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysis: Laboratory correlative studies will be performed
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival
|
2 months
95% Confidence Interval was incalculable due to an insufficient number of events
|
1.2 months
Interval 0.8 to 2.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 weeks (6 courses)Population: The data was not collected and analyzed for this outcome measure
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Cohort A
Cohort B
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort A
n=1 participants at risk
Cohort A: Patients receive alisertib PO BID on days 1-7. Patients unable to achieve CR after course 4 also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 5-12. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Cohort B
n=13 participants at risk
Cohort B: Patients receive alisertib as in Cohort A. Patients achieving SD or asymptomatic progressive disease after 2 courses also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 3-10. Patients unable to achieve CR by course 4, receive rituximab as in Cohort A. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
15.4%
2/13 • Number of events 2
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Generalized muscle weakness
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thromboembolic event
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Cystitis
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasms benign
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort A
n=1 participants at risk
Cohort A: Patients receive alisertib PO BID on days 1-7. Patients unable to achieve CR after course 4 also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 5-12. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Cohort B
n=13 participants at risk
Cohort B: Patients receive alisertib as in Cohort A. Patients achieving SD or asymptomatic progressive disease after 2 courses also receive rituximab IV on day 1 of courses 3-10. Patients unable to achieve CR by course 4, receive rituximab as in Cohort A. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
100.0%
1/1 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
30.8%
4/13 • Number of events 4
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
30.8%
4/13 • Number of events 4
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
Infections and infestations
Febrile Neutropenia
|
100.0%
1/1 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
0.00%
0/13
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1
The National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade toxicities for patients
|
Additional Information
Kristie Blum, MD
The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place