Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Interventional Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Oxycodone/Naloxone in Korean Patients With Spinal Disorders (NCT NCT01811238)
NCT ID: NCT01811238
Last Updated: 2016-05-12
Results Overview
NRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week 8/ET minus mean score at Baseline.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
240 participants
Baseline, 8 week
2016-05-12
Participant Flow
The 10 general hospitals were recruited patients from 26 Sep. 2012 to 02 Aug. 2013.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Oxycodone/Naloxone
Single-arm study
Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
240
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Set
|
220
|
|
Overall Study
ITT Set
|
209
|
|
Overall Study
PP Set
|
120
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
159
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
81
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Oxycodone/Naloxone
Single-arm study
Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
42
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
25
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
subject refused study medication
|
6
|
Baseline Characteristics
An Interventional Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Oxycodone/Naloxone in Korean Patients With Spinal Disorders
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=220 Participants
Single-arm study
Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.42 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
136 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
|
220 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weekPopulation: The 209 is IIT set population. ITT set included all subjects who participated in the study and had at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one primary efficacy endpoint data available. Missing values were imputed by LOCF.
NRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week 8/ET minus mean score at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=209 Participants
Single-arm study
Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity of Patient With Spinal Disorder as Measured by NRS.
|
-1.69 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.18
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weekPopulation: ITT set included all subjects who participated in the study and had at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one primary efficacy endpoint data available.Missing values were imputed by LOCF.
EQ-5D to measure of health related quality of life should be answered as one of 3 levels about current condition for 5 dimensions and was calculated total average by giving a weighting on 3 level of answers (EQ-5D levels into 'no problems' (level 1) and 'problems' (level 2 and 3)). Table of scores by each level for EQ-5D items: mobility(level 1=0, level2=0.069,level 3=0.314), self care(level 1=0, level2=0.104,level 3=0.214), usual activities(level 1=0, level2=0.036,level 3=0.094), pain/discomfort (level 1=0, level2=0.,level 3=0.386) and anxiety/depression(level 1=0, level2=0.071,level 3=0.2) \*EQ-5D Total = 1 - 0.081 - (the score of the each level) - 0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents) EQ-5D total score could be 0.919 in maximum and -0.594 in minimum if case all index indicates the level 3. So, if EQ-5D total score closed by "1" means that the healthy condition and high quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=209 Participants
Single-arm study
Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
|
|---|---|
|
The Change in Quality of Life (EQ-5D) at Week 8 of Treatment With the Study Drug From Baseline
|
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weekPopulation: ITT Population. Below results : Visit 4(8week)(LOCF): n(%)
The number of patients who choose the best opinion of overall satisfaction among Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale(CGIC) among 7 point scale. Missing data was imputed by LOCF. Very much improved much improved minimally improved no change minimally worse much worse very much worse
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=209 Participants
Single-arm study
Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
Very much improved
|
20 participants
|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
Much improved
|
49 participants
|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
Minimally improved
|
70 participants
|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
No change
|
57 participants
|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
Minimally worse
|
6 participants
|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
much worse
|
5 participants
|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
Very much worse
|
2 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weekPopulation: IIT set.
NRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week 4/ET minus mean score at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=209 Participants
Single-arm study
Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
|
|---|---|
|
Change of Pain Intensity in Patient With Spinal Disorder at Week 4 of Treatment With the Study Drug From Baseline
|
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.04
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weeksPopulation: ITT set, Missing values were imputed by LOCF. Difference (Visti 4(8w)-Baseline)
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' (score = 100) and 'Worst imaginable health state' (score = 0). Higher points were positive results and positive points of difference gap means improvement results.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=209 Participants
Single-arm study
Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life Assessed by EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)
|
10.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 8weekPopulation: IIT set, Missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Number of participants with categorical change in overall satisfaction. PGIC: a participant-rated instrument assessing change in participant's overall satisfaction from baseline, on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=209 Participants
Single-arm study
Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
|
|---|---|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
Very much improved
|
16 participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
Much improved
|
49 participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
Minimally improved
|
69 participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
No change
|
60 participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
Minimally worse
|
6 participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
Much worse
|
6 participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
Very much worse
|
3 participants
|
Adverse Events
Oxycodone/Naloxone
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=220 participants at risk
Single-arm study
Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
|
|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Femur fracture
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
osteoarthritis
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal cancer
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=220 participants at risk
Single-arm study
Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
9.5%
21/220 • Number of events 21 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
constipation
|
5.5%
12/220 • Number of events 12 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
2.7%
6/220 • Number of events 6 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
2.3%
5/220 • Number of events 5 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
2.3%
5/220 • Number of events 5 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.91%
2/220 • Number of events 2 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorder
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
6.4%
14/220 • Number of events 14 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
2.7%
6/220 • Number of events 6 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
1.8%
4/220 • Number of events 4 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Parosmia
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
5.0%
11/220 • Number of events 11 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
1.4%
3/220 • Number of events 3 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
General disorders
Thirst
|
0.91%
2/220 • Number of events 2 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
General disorders
Face oedema
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
3.2%
7/220 • Number of events 7 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
1.4%
3/220 • Number of events 3 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.91%
2/220 • Number of events 2 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Otorrhoea
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal cancer
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place