Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Interventional Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Oxycodone/Naloxone in Korean Patients With Spinal Disorders (NCT NCT01811238)

NCT ID: NCT01811238

Last Updated: 2016-05-12

Results Overview

NRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week 8/ET minus mean score at Baseline.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

240 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, 8 week

Results posted on

2016-05-12

Participant Flow

The 10 general hospitals were recruited patients from 26 Sep. 2012 to 02 Aug. 2013.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Oxycodone/Naloxone
Single-arm study Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
Overall Study
STARTED
240
Overall Study
Safety Set
220
Overall Study
ITT Set
209
Overall Study
PP Set
120
Overall Study
COMPLETED
159
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
81

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Oxycodone/Naloxone
Single-arm study Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
42
Overall Study
Adverse Event
25
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
4
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
4
Overall Study
subject refused study medication
6

Baseline Characteristics

An Interventional Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Oxycodone/Naloxone in Korean Patients With Spinal Disorders

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=220 Participants
Single-arm study Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
Age, Continuous
62.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.42 • n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
136 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
220 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 8 week

Population: The 209 is IIT set population. ITT set included all subjects who participated in the study and had at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one primary efficacy endpoint data available. Missing values were imputed by LOCF.

NRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week 8/ET minus mean score at Baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=209 Participants
Single-arm study Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity of Patient With Spinal Disorder as Measured by NRS.
-1.69 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.18

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 8 week

Population: ITT set included all subjects who participated in the study and had at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one primary efficacy endpoint data available.Missing values were imputed by LOCF.

EQ-5D to measure of health related quality of life should be answered as one of 3 levels about current condition for 5 dimensions and was calculated total average by giving a weighting on 3 level of answers (EQ-5D levels into 'no problems' (level 1) and 'problems' (level 2 and 3)). Table of scores by each level for EQ-5D items: mobility(level 1=0, level2=0.069,level 3=0.314), self care(level 1=0, level2=0.104,level 3=0.214), usual activities(level 1=0, level2=0.036,level 3=0.094), pain/discomfort (level 1=0, level2=0.,level 3=0.386) and anxiety/depression(level 1=0, level2=0.071,level 3=0.2) \*EQ-5D Total = 1 - 0.081 - (the score of the each level) - 0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents) EQ-5D total score could be 0.919 in maximum and -0.594 in minimum if case all index indicates the level 3. So, if EQ-5D total score closed by "1" means that the healthy condition and high quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=209 Participants
Single-arm study Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
The Change in Quality of Life (EQ-5D) at Week 8 of Treatment With the Study Drug From Baseline
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 8 week

Population: ITT Population. Below results : Visit 4(8week)(LOCF): n(%)

The number of patients who choose the best opinion of overall satisfaction among Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale(CGIC) among 7 point scale. Missing data was imputed by LOCF. Very much improved much improved minimally improved no change minimally worse much worse very much worse

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=209 Participants
Single-arm study Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
Very much improved
20 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
Much improved
49 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
Minimally improved
70 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
No change
57 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
Minimally worse
6 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
much worse
5 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
Very much worse
2 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 4 week

Population: IIT set.

NRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week 4/ET minus mean score at Baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=209 Participants
Single-arm study Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
Change of Pain Intensity in Patient With Spinal Disorder at Week 4 of Treatment With the Study Drug From Baseline
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.04

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weeks

Population: ITT set, Missing values were imputed by LOCF. Difference (Visti 4(8w)-Baseline)

The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' (score = 100) and 'Worst imaginable health state' (score = 0). Higher points were positive results and positive points of difference gap means improvement results.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=209 Participants
Single-arm study Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life Assessed by EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)
10.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.11

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 8week

Population: IIT set, Missing values were imputed by LOCF.

Number of participants with categorical change in overall satisfaction. PGIC: a participant-rated instrument assessing change in participant's overall satisfaction from baseline, on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=209 Participants
Single-arm study Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
Very much improved
16 participants
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
Much improved
49 participants
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
Minimally improved
69 participants
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
No change
60 participants
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
Minimally worse
6 participants
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
Much worse
6 participants
Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC)
Very much worse
3 participants

Adverse Events

Oxycodone/Naloxone

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 77 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=220 participants at risk
Single-arm study Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Femur fracture
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
osteoarthritis
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal cancer
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Oxycodone/Naloxone
n=220 participants at risk
Single-arm study Oxycodone/Naloxone: 8 weeks treatment with Oxycodone/Naloxone
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
9.5%
21/220 • Number of events 21 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Gastrointestinal disorders
constipation
5.5%
12/220 • Number of events 12 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
2.7%
6/220 • Number of events 6 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
2.3%
5/220 • Number of events 5 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
2.3%
5/220 • Number of events 5 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.91%
2/220 • Number of events 2 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorder
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
6.4%
14/220 • Number of events 14 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
2.7%
6/220 • Number of events 6 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
1.8%
4/220 • Number of events 4 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Nervous system disorders
Parosmia
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
5.0%
11/220 • Number of events 11 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
1.4%
3/220 • Number of events 3 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
General disorders
Thirst
0.91%
2/220 • Number of events 2 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
General disorders
Face oedema
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
General disorders
Oedema
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
General disorders
Pain
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
3.2%
7/220 • Number of events 7 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
1.4%
3/220 • Number of events 3 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
0.91%
2/220 • Number of events 2 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Otorrhoea
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal cancer
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • Follow up 8 weeks
In the safety set, a total of 120 AEs were reported in 77 subjects (35.0%, 77/220 subjects), regardless of causal relationship to the study drug. Of those, 95 events in 61 subjects (27.7%,61/220 subjects) were ADRs of which causal relationship to the study drug cannot be ruled out.

Additional Information

Dr.Sungsoo Chung

Samsung Medical Center

Phone: 82-3410-1226

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place