Safety Study of Nicardipine to Treat Cerebral Vasospasm
NCT ID: NCT01810302
Last Updated: 2014-08-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
2 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-08-31
2014-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Because of this relationship between cerebral vasospasm, cerebral ischemia, and poor outcome, there has been significant effort to establish treatments that decrease the incidence of vasospasm after SAH. Currently, medications and hemodynamic maneuvers are used as standard of care for the treatment of vasospasm and to improve outcome after SAH.
The calcium channel blocker, nimodipine, is one of the few treatments for vasospasm that has been shown to be of proven benefit. Nicardipine is another calcium channel blocker that has been evaluated in several studies via an intravenous administration route. These studies did show significant improvements in symptomatic and angiographic vasospasm, although a benefit in outcome was not seen. However, the intravenous administration of nicardipine was associated with significant systemic side effects that may have affected outcome including hypotension, pulmonary edema, and azotemia.
The administration of nicardipine via an intrathecal route avoids the systemic complications associated with intravenous dosing since the direct cerebrospinal fluid dosing is much lower. The result is that the systemic concentration will remain low avoiding systemic side effects, and central nervous system concentration will remain high. We propose that this difference may improve outcomes while minimizing complication related effects on patient outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nicardipine hydrochloride
Nicardipine hydrochloride 4mg by intrathecal administration twice a day until post-hemorrhage day 10.
Nicardipine hydrochloride
Nicardipine hydrochloride 4mg by intrathecal administration twice a day until post-hemorrhage day 10.
Preservative-free normal saline
Preservative-free normal saline 1.6 mL by intrathecal administration twice a day until post-hemorrhage day 10.
Preservative-free normal saline
Preservative-free normal saline 1.6 mL by intrathecal administration twice a day until post-hemorrhage day 10.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nicardipine hydrochloride
Nicardipine hydrochloride 4mg by intrathecal administration twice a day until post-hemorrhage day 10.
Preservative-free normal saline
Preservative-free normal saline 1.6 mL by intrathecal administration twice a day until post-hemorrhage day 10.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subarachnoid hemorrhage documented on head CT
* Fisher Grade 3 or 4
* Hunt Hess Grade 1-5
* Cerebral aneurysm as definitive source of subarachnoid hemorrhage
* Cerebral aneurysm must be treated via open or endovascular techniques
* Presence of external ventricular drain
* Written informed consent obtained from subject or subject's legally authorized representative
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (perimesencephalic)
* Untreated cerebral aneurysm
* Inability to be randomized prior to post-hemorrhage day 4
* Elevated intra-cranial pressures that would preclude external ventricular drain clamping for 30-60 minutes
* Inability to administer study medication (severe intra-ventricular hemorrhage, occluded external ventricular drain)
* Inability to obtain angiography (coagulopathy, renal failure)
* Pregnant
* Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Spiros L. Blackburn, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Florida
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
034-2013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id