Trial Outcomes & Findings for The "START" (a Streamlined ART Initiation Strategy) Study (NCT NCT01810289)
NCT ID: NCT01810289
Last Updated: 2018-11-07
Results Overview
Patients may be ART eligible at the start of the study or become ART eligible for the first time in the 3 year time frame.
COMPLETED
NA
12024 participants
14 days
2018-11-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Pre-intervention
This study is stepped-wedge in design, therefore each clinic experienced a period of time before the intervention rolled out and then a time period after the intervention rolled out. Each clinic contributes time to both conditions. In the pre-intervention condition the clinic is using the standard of care.
|
Post-intervention
This study is stepped-wedge in design, therefore each clinic experienced a period of time before the intervention rolled out and then a time period after the intervention rolled out. Each clinic contributes time to both conditions. In the intervention condition ("post-intervention") the clinics have received the intervention - training, ongoing feedback, as well as the point of care CD4 (PIMA) machine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
7277
|
4747
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
7277
|
4747
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
The "START" (a Streamlined ART Initiation Strategy) Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Pre-intervention
n=7277 Participants
This study is stepped-wedge in design, so each clinic experienced a period of time before the intervention rolled out and then a time period after the intervention rolled out. Each clinic contributes time to both conditions.
|
Post-intervention
n=4747 Participants
This study is stepped-wedge in design, so each clinic experienced a period of time before the intervention rolled out and then a time period after the intervention rolled out. Each clinic contributes time to both conditions.
|
Total
n=12024 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
31 years
n=5 Participants
|
30 years
n=7 Participants
|
31 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4715 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2830 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7545 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2562 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1917 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4479 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 14 daysPopulation: Persons who did have the opportunity for 14 days of follow up were excluded from these analyses.
Patients may be ART eligible at the start of the study or become ART eligible for the first time in the 3 year time frame.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pre-intervention
n=7066 Participants
This study is stepped-wedge in design, so each clinic experienced a period of time before the intervention rolled out and then a time period after the intervention rolled out. Each clinic contributes time to both conditions. Clinics in the pre-intervention condition are giving the standard of care.
|
Post-intervention
n=4747 Participants
This study is stepped-wedge in design, so each clinic experienced a period of time before the intervention rolled out and then a time period after the intervention rolled out. Each clinic contributes time to both conditions. Clinics in the intervention ("post-intervention") have experienced training, ongoing feedback and have the PIMA machine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Incidence of ART Initiation 14 Days After Clinical Eligibility in Treatment Eligible HIV-infected Patients
|
2585 participants
|
3753 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearsPopulation: Mortality information is not systematically measured in the program data. We assessed this outcome in the subgroup selected for HIV RNA.
We ascertained mortality in the subgroup of those selected for HIV RNA assessment. Vital status is not reliably reported in program data. Assessment was 1 year after ART eligibility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pre-intervention
n=199 Participants
This study is stepped-wedge in design, so each clinic experienced a period of time before the intervention rolled out and then a time period after the intervention rolled out. Each clinic contributes time to both conditions. Clinics in the pre-intervention condition are giving the standard of care.
|
Post-intervention
n=208 Participants
This study is stepped-wedge in design, so each clinic experienced a period of time before the intervention rolled out and then a time period after the intervention rolled out. Each clinic contributes time to both conditions. Clinics in the intervention ("post-intervention") have experienced training, ongoing feedback and have the PIMA machine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Mortality in Treatment-eligible, HIV-infected Patients.
|
3 percentage of reported deaths
|
2 percentage of reported deaths
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearsPopulation: Retention was assess among all in the study
Retention was operationalized as the proportion of appointments made within 7 days within one year after ART eligibility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pre-intervention
n=25920 Appointments
This study is stepped-wedge in design, so each clinic experienced a period of time before the intervention rolled out and then a time period after the intervention rolled out. Each clinic contributes time to both conditions. Clinics in the pre-intervention condition are giving the standard of care.
|
Post-intervention
n=15241 Appointments
This study is stepped-wedge in design, so each clinic experienced a period of time before the intervention rolled out and then a time period after the intervention rolled out. Each clinic contributes time to both conditions. Clinics in the intervention ("post-intervention") have experienced training, ongoing feedback and have the PIMA machine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Retention in HIV Care Among Treatment-eligible, HIV-infected Patients.
|
84 percentage of appointments made
|
84 percentage of appointments made
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: A total of 437 (217 in control + 220 in intervention) patients were selected for blood samples. We did two analyses, one treating missing as failure and another using inverse probability weighting to address missing outcomes. The primary reported here is missing as failure.
Due to financial constraints, HIV RNA was measured in a random sample of patients to asses virologic suppression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pre-intervention
n=217 Participants
This study is stepped-wedge in design, so each clinic experienced a period of time before the intervention rolled out and then a time period after the intervention rolled out. Each clinic contributes time to both conditions. Clinics in the pre-intervention condition are giving the standard of care.
|
Post-intervention
n=220 Participants
This study is stepped-wedge in design, so each clinic experienced a period of time before the intervention rolled out and then a time period after the intervention rolled out. Each clinic contributes time to both conditions. Clinics in the intervention ("post-intervention") have experienced training, ongoing feedback and have the PIMA machine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
HIV RNA Levels Among Treatment-eligible, HIV-infected Patients One Year Following ART Eligibility
|
58 percentage of participants
|
66 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: Linking children to mothers in a systematic way was unattainable in these program data. We were unable to ascertain this outcome.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Pre-intervention
Post-intervention
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Elvin Geng
University of California at San Francisco
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place