Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Open, Non-comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Treatment of Acne Scars With Restylane Vital Lidocaine (NCT NCT01807455)
NCT ID: NCT01807455
Last Updated: 2022-08-26
Results Overview
Percentage of improved subjects at 36 weeks after first treatment session assessed using Subject GAIS. Scale range is Worse, No Change, Somewhat Improved, Much Improved and Very Much Improved. Alternatives Somewhat Improved to Very Much Improved are considered an improvement, i.e. a better outcome.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
12 participants
36 weeks
2022-08-26
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
An Open, Non-comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Treatment of Acne Scars With Restylane Vital Lidocaine
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
n=12 Participants
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
33 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 weeksPercentage of improved subjects at 36 weeks after first treatment session assessed using Subject GAIS. Scale range is Worse, No Change, Somewhat Improved, Much Improved and Very Much Improved. Alternatives Somewhat Improved to Very Much Improved are considered an improvement, i.e. a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
n=12 Participants
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
|
|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Acne Scarring and the Surrounding Skin Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
|
100 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 weeksPercentage of subjects satisfied with the overall appearance of the face at 36 weeks after first treatment session. Scale range is Very dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Somewhat satisfied and Very satisfied. Alternatives Somewhat satisfied to Very satified are considered a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
n=12 Participants
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
|
|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Skin Quality and Overall Satisfaction Using a Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire
|
83.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 weeksPercentage of subjects improved at 36 weeks after first treatment session assessed using SCAR-S. Scale range is Very severe, Severe, Moderate, Mild, Almost clear and Clear. The alternative Clear is considered the best outcome. Improvement is considered to be at least one step improvement on the scale toward the alternative Clear.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
n=12 Participants
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
|
|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Acne Scarring Using the Scale for Acne Scar Severity (SCAR-S)
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 14 daysNumber of subjects reporting anticipated injection-related reactions after treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
n=12 Participants
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
|
|---|---|
|
Assessment of Local Tolerability After Treatment
|
12 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 weeksNumber of subjects reporting at least one adverse event (assessed as unrelated or related to treatment)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
n=12 Participants
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
|
|---|---|
|
Adverse Event Reporting During the Study
|
8 participants
|
Adverse Events
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
n=12 participants at risk
Restylane Vital Lidocaine
|
|---|---|
|
General disorders
Implant site bruising
|
16.7%
2/12 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.
|
|
General disorders
Implant site erythema
|
41.7%
5/12 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.
|
|
General disorders
Implant site inflammation
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.
|
|
General disorders
Implant site mass
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.
|
|
General disorders
Implant site nodule
|
41.7%
5/12 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.
|
|
General disorders
Implant site pain
|
16.7%
2/12 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.
|
|
General disorders
Implant site swelling
|
25.0%
3/12 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site inflammation
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site warmth
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER