Trial Outcomes & Findings for Intercostal Nerve Block With Liposome Bupivacaine in Subjects Undergoing Posterolateral Thoracotomy (NCT NCT01802411)
NCT ID: NCT01802411
Last Updated: 2021-07-12
Results Overview
AUC of pain intensity scores at rest through 72 hours postsurgery. Participants assumed a resting position that did not exacerbate his or her postsurgical pain. Pain intensity scores were measured at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours postsurgery, at first request for rescue pain medication, and on day 12 using the numeric rating scale at rest (NRS-R; 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
191 participants
0-72 hours postsurgery
2021-07-12
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266 mg
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments)
EXPAREL 266 mg
|
Placebo
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
96
|
95
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
82
|
74
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
21
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266 mg
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments)
EXPAREL 266 mg
|
Placebo
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
8
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Planned pleurodesis as part of the proc
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Surgery aborted after bronchoscopy
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Proc changed to video-asst thorascopic
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Intercostal Nerve Block With Liposome Bupivacaine in Subjects Undergoing Posterolateral Thoracotomy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266 mg
n=94 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments)
EXPAREL 266 mg
|
Placebo
n=91 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments)
Placebo
|
Total
n=185 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.71 • n=5 Participants
|
58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.03 • n=7 Participants
|
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.84 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
124 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
90 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
178 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
94 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
185 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
38 participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 participants
n=7 Participants
|
70 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 participants
n=7 Participants
|
48 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Georgia
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification
1
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification
2
|
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification
3
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-72 hours postsurgeryPopulation: The efficacy population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on randomized treatment
AUC of pain intensity scores at rest through 72 hours postsurgery. Participants assumed a resting position that did not exacerbate his or her postsurgical pain. Pain intensity scores were measured at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours postsurgery, at first request for rescue pain medication, and on day 12 using the numeric rating scale at rest (NRS-R; 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266 mg
n=94 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments)
EXPAREL 266 mg
|
Placebo
n=91 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Pain Intensity at Rest Through 72 Hours
|
472.1 score on a scale * hr
Standard Error 37.19
|
459.0 score on a scale * hr
Standard Error 36.57
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-72 hours postsurgeryPopulation: The efficacy population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on randomized treatment
Total postsurgical opioid consumption (morphine equivalent) through 72 hours postsurgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266 mg
n=94 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments)
EXPAREL 266 mg
|
Placebo
n=91 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Postsurgical Opioid Consumption Through 72 Hours
|
70.88 mg morphine equivalent dose
Standard Deviation 37.537
|
71.38 mg morphine equivalent dose
Standard Deviation 39.418
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 72 hours postsurgeryPopulation: Time to first use of opioid rescue medication through 72 hours postsurgery, calculated as the date and time of first opioid use minus the date and time of the end of surgery.
Time to first use of opioid rescue medication through 72 hours postsurgery, calculated as the date and time of first opioid use minus the date and time of the end of surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266 mg
n=94 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments)
EXPAREL 266 mg
|
Placebo
n=91 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to First Opioid Rescue Through 72 Hours Postsurgery
|
1.1 hours
Interval 0.08 to 72.0
|
0.7 hours
Interval 0.1 to 72.0
|
Adverse Events
EXPAREL 266 mg
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266 mg
n=94 participants at risk
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments)
EXPAREL 266 mg
|
Placebo
n=91 participants at risk
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrest
|
2.1%
2/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
2.2%
2/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
2.1%
2/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
2.1%
2/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
2.2%
2/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
2.2%
2/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial obstruction
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lobar pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung infection Pseudomonal
|
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postprocedural hemorrhage
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Heart injury
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound dehiscence
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute renal failure
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral hematoma
|
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Coma uremic
|
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholestasis
|
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Brain neoplasm
|
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Circulatory collapse
|
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
|
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266 mg
n=94 participants at risk
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments)
EXPAREL 266 mg
|
Placebo
n=91 participants at risk
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
2.1%
2/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
6.6%
6/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
17.0%
16/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
13.2%
12/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
10.6%
10/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
5.5%
5/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
2.1%
2/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
6.6%
6/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
9.6%
9/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
7.7%
7/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
9.6%
9/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
8.8%
8/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
7.4%
7/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
4.4%
4/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
9.6%
9/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
4.4%
4/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
7.4%
7/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
4.4%
4/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
7.4%
7/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
2.2%
2/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus generalized
|
2.1%
2/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
5.5%
5/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
|
Additional Information
Pacira Medical Information
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Any proposed publication/presentation of study-related information is subject to advance review by the Sponsor ≥60 days before intended submission/presentation. Investigator/institution shall amend publication/presentation as needed to address errors or confidential information identified by the Sponsor. If requested in writing by the Sponsor, investigator/institution shall withhold publication for an additional 90 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER