Trial Outcomes & Findings for Intercostal Nerve Block With Liposome Bupivacaine in Subjects Undergoing Posterolateral Thoracotomy (NCT NCT01802411)

NCT ID: NCT01802411

Last Updated: 2021-07-12

Results Overview

AUC of pain intensity scores at rest through 72 hours postsurgery. Participants assumed a resting position that did not exacerbate his or her postsurgical pain. Pain intensity scores were measured at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours postsurgery, at first request for rescue pain medication, and on day 12 using the numeric rating scale at rest (NRS-R; 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

191 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

0-72 hours postsurgery

Results posted on

2021-07-12

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
EXPAREL 266 mg
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments) EXPAREL 266 mg
Placebo
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments) Placebo
Overall Study
STARTED
96
95
Overall Study
COMPLETED
82
74
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
14
21

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
EXPAREL 266 mg
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments) EXPAREL 266 mg
Placebo
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments) Placebo
Overall Study
Death
2
1
Overall Study
Adverse Event
2
7
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
8
10
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
0
2
Overall Study
Planned pleurodesis as part of the proc
1
0
Overall Study
Surgery aborted after bronchoscopy
1
0
Overall Study
Proc changed to video-asst thorascopic
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Intercostal Nerve Block With Liposome Bupivacaine in Subjects Undergoing Posterolateral Thoracotomy

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
EXPAREL 266 mg
n=94 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments) EXPAREL 266 mg
Placebo
n=91 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments) Placebo
Total
n=185 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.71 • n=5 Participants
58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.03 • n=7 Participants
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.84 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
60 Participants
n=7 Participants
124 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
90 Participants
n=5 Participants
88 Participants
n=7 Participants
178 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
94 Participants
n=5 Participants
91 Participants
n=7 Participants
185 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 participants
n=5 Participants
3 participants
n=7 Participants
5 participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
38 participants
n=5 Participants
32 participants
n=7 Participants
70 participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
20 participants
n=5 Participants
28 participants
n=7 Participants
48 participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
17 participants
n=5 Participants
18 participants
n=7 Participants
35 participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Georgia
17 participants
n=5 Participants
10 participants
n=7 Participants
27 participants
n=5 Participants
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification
1
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification
2
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification
3
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
31 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 0-72 hours postsurgery

Population: The efficacy population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on randomized treatment

AUC of pain intensity scores at rest through 72 hours postsurgery. Participants assumed a resting position that did not exacerbate his or her postsurgical pain. Pain intensity scores were measured at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours postsurgery, at first request for rescue pain medication, and on day 12 using the numeric rating scale at rest (NRS-R; 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
EXPAREL 266 mg
n=94 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments) EXPAREL 266 mg
Placebo
n=91 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments) Placebo
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Pain Intensity at Rest Through 72 Hours
472.1 score on a scale * hr
Standard Error 37.19
459.0 score on a scale * hr
Standard Error 36.57

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0-72 hours postsurgery

Population: The efficacy population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on randomized treatment

Total postsurgical opioid consumption (morphine equivalent) through 72 hours postsurgery

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
EXPAREL 266 mg
n=94 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments) EXPAREL 266 mg
Placebo
n=91 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments) Placebo
Total Postsurgical Opioid Consumption Through 72 Hours
70.88 mg morphine equivalent dose
Standard Deviation 37.537
71.38 mg morphine equivalent dose
Standard Deviation 39.418

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 72 hours postsurgery

Population: Time to first use of opioid rescue medication through 72 hours postsurgery, calculated as the date and time of first opioid use minus the date and time of the end of surgery.

Time to first use of opioid rescue medication through 72 hours postsurgery, calculated as the date and time of first opioid use minus the date and time of the end of surgery.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
EXPAREL 266 mg
n=94 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments) EXPAREL 266 mg
Placebo
n=91 Participants
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments) Placebo
Time to First Opioid Rescue Through 72 Hours Postsurgery
1.1 hours
Interval 0.08 to 72.0
0.7 hours
Interval 0.1 to 72.0

Adverse Events

EXPAREL 266 mg

Serious events: 12 serious events
Other events: 63 other events
Deaths: 2 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 10 serious events
Other events: 55 other events
Deaths: 4 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
EXPAREL 266 mg
n=94 participants at risk
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments) EXPAREL 266 mg
Placebo
n=91 participants at risk
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments) Placebo
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrest
2.1%
2/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
2.2%
2/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
2.1%
2/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
2.1%
2/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
2.2%
2/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
2.2%
2/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial obstruction
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Infections and infestations
Lobar pneumonia
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Infections and infestations
Lung infection Pseudomonal
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postprocedural hemorrhage
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Heart injury
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound dehiscence
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute renal failure
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral hematoma
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Nervous system disorders
Coma uremic
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholestasis
1.1%
1/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
0.00%
0/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Brain neoplasm
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Vascular disorders
Circulatory collapse
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
0.00%
0/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
1.1%
1/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
EXPAREL 266 mg
n=94 participants at risk
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 266 mg (approximately 88 mg \[6.6 mL\] to each of three nerve segments) EXPAREL 266 mg
Placebo
n=91 participants at risk
Intercostal nerve block using single total administration of 20 mL normal saline (6.6 mL to each of three nerve segments) Placebo
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
2.1%
2/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
6.6%
6/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
General disorders
Pyrexia
17.0%
16/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
13.2%
12/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
10.6%
10/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
5.5%
5/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
2.1%
2/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
6.6%
6/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
9.6%
9/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
7.7%
7/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
9.6%
9/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
8.8%
8/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
7.4%
7/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
4.4%
4/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
General disorders
Fatigue
9.6%
9/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
4.4%
4/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
7.4%
7/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
4.4%
4/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
7.4%
7/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
2.2%
2/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus generalized
2.1%
2/94 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.
5.5%
5/91 • From time of randomization through the day 30 follow-up contact
The safety population included all participants who received study drug, with analysis based on actual treatment received. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were solicited from the neurological assessment or from the opioid-related AE questionnaire were included in this table.

Additional Information

Pacira Medical Information

Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Phone: Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Any proposed publication/presentation of study-related information is subject to advance review by the Sponsor ≥60 days before intended submission/presentation. Investigator/institution shall amend publication/presentation as needed to address errors or confidential information identified by the Sponsor. If requested in writing by the Sponsor, investigator/institution shall withhold publication for an additional 90 days.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER