A Randomized Cross-over Study for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
NCT ID: NCT01798641
Last Updated: 2018-11-02
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-01-31
2017-09-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oscillometric Versus Intraarterial Blood Pressure Monitoring During Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy
NCT07349186
Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Post-BPH Overactive Bladder
NCT06558539
Evaluation of Efficacy and Accuracy of Aquamantys Device in General Surgery
NCT01929902
WATER III: Aquablation vs. Transurethral Laser Enucleation of Large Prostates (80 - 180mL) in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT04801381
Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT03721029
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The standard methods by which we diagnose patients who have symptoms of NPH are less accurate than desired. Many times patients remain undiagnosed or untreated while others receive treatment due to a false-positive diagnosis.
To treat NPH, a small tube called a 'shunt' can be surgically placed in the brain to drain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and help relieve symptoms. Currently, the reported response rates to shunting vary from 31% to 89%. Follow-up studies have shown that the shunts may not work long-term. This could be due to the natural history of the disease, development of other diseases, or due to a short term 'placebo effect' following the shunt placement surgery.
Our group is doing a study of patients with NPH. All participants in this study will have a shunt placed. These shunts are programmable and, once placed, may be opened or closed by the doctor. Programming the shunt does not require an additional surgical procedure. All study participants will be divided into two groups. One group will have their shunts open and draining. The other group will have their shunts closed (not draining). After 6 weeks, the groups will be switched. Those with open shunts will have them closed, and the group with closed, non-draining shunts, will have theirs opened. Participants will not know if their shunts are open (draining) or if they are closed (not draining). Study participants will be followed for two years. Any participants who develop recurrent, new or worsening symptoms will be taken off study and treated according to good medical practice.
The purpose of this study is to (a) look for symptom improvement in response to the draining shunt compared to the non-draining shunt (placebo affect), (b) find 'predictors' that will help doctors identify patients who will respond well to shunt placement, (c) monitor the long-term effects of these shunts, and (d) assess current diagnostic testing to see which methods are most accurate.
Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria
1. Age of Patients ( between 60 to 85 years old).
2. Clinically suspected Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH) with at least gait impairment.
3. Informed consent from patient.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Etiology for hydrocephalus other than iNPH.
2. Patients not capable of providing an informed consent.
3. History of intra-cerebral hemorrhage.
4. Cardiac Pacemaker.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Open Shunt
The programmable valve, MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA®, will be open at this time. The adjustment is done in the out-patient clinic.
MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA®
The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA® valve and crossed over at 6 weeks. The open shunt will be adjusted to be closed. The closed shunt will be adjusted to open.
Closed Shunt
The programmable valve, MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA®, will be closed during this time. The adjustment is done in the out-patient clinic.
MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA®
The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA® valve and crossed over at 6 weeks. The open shunt will be adjusted to be closed. The closed shunt will be adjusted to open.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA®
The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA® valve and crossed over at 6 weeks. The open shunt will be adjusted to be closed. The closed shunt will be adjusted to open.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinically suspected Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) with at least gait impairment
* Informed consent from patient
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients not capable of providing an informed consent.
* History of intra-cerebral hemorrhage
* Cardiac Pacemaker
60 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aesculap, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Ohio State University
OTHER
Rhode Island Hospital
OTHER
Virginia Commonwealth University
OTHER
Henry Ford Health System
OTHER
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniele Rigamonti, MD FACS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Jennifer Lu
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Virgina Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NA_00042178
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.