Trial Outcomes & Findings for Lipoprotein Apheresis in Refractory Angina Study (NCT NCT01796912)
NCT ID: NCT01796912
Last Updated: 2019-11-12
Results Overview
Baseline compare to 3 month, changes presented Determine the impact of lipoprotein apheresis on quantitative myocardial perfusion measured by stress/rest cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Increase means better outcome
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
3 months
2019-11-12
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
First Lipoprotein Apheresis, Then Sham Apheresis
Three months of weekly lipoprotein apheresis, 1 month of washout then three month of sham apheresis
|
First Sham Apheresis, Then Lipoprotein Apheresis
Three months of weekly sham apheresis, 1 month of washout then three months of weekly lipoprotein apheresis
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
STARTED
|
10
|
10
|
|
First Intervention
COMPLETED
|
10
|
10
|
|
First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Washout
STARTED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Washout
COMPLETED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Washout
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention
STARTED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Second Intervention
COMPLETED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Study Participant
n=20 Participants
Participant were randomised to undergoing lipoprotein apheresis weekly for three months or sham apheresis weekly for three months with assessment of myocardial perfusion, carotid atherosclerosis, endothelial vascular function, thrombogenesis, exercise capacity, angina symptoms and quality of life at the beginning and end of treatment. Patients then crossovered to the opposite study arm with the protocol repeated.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=20 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
19 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
20 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsBaseline compare to 3 month, changes presented Determine the impact of lipoprotein apheresis on quantitative myocardial perfusion measured by stress/rest cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Increase means better outcome
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lipoprotein Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly lipoprotein apheresis
|
Sham Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly sham apheresis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Measured by Stress/Rest Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|
0.47 ratio
Interval 0.31 to 0.63
|
-0.16 ratio
Interval -0.33 to 0.02
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsChanges from baseline to 3 months
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lipoprotein Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly lipoprotein apheresis
|
Sham Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly sham apheresis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Carotid Atherosclerosis/Plaque Burden Determined by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|
-335 mm3
Interval -423.0 to -247.0
|
127 mm3
Interval 72.0 to 183.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 7 days before and after 3 months of weekly lipoprotein apheresisEndoPat LnRHI - natural logarithm of reactive hyperaemia index. Increase - better outcome
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lipoprotein Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly lipoprotein apheresis
|
Sham Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly sham apheresis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Endothelial Vascular Function
|
-0.05 index
Interval -0.08 to 0.19
|
-0.03 index
Interval -0.18 to 0.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsSAQ-Angina stability, increase means improvement. 0-100 scale, Higher score means improvements
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lipoprotein Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly lipoprotein apheresis
|
Sham Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly sham apheresis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score
|
17.5 units on a scale
Interval 6.7 to 28.3
|
-1.75 units on a scale
Interval -17.1 to 9.55
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsQuality of Life score following, 0-100 score, high score improve quality of life
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lipoprotein Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly lipoprotein apheresis
|
Sham Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly sham apheresis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in SF-36 Quality of Life Score
|
7.5 units on a scale
Interval 5.0 to 13.0
|
-2 units on a scale
Interval -4.5 to 1.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsSix minute walk test, patient can walk longer distance means improvements
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lipoprotein Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly lipoprotein apheresis
|
Sham Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly sham apheresis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Exercise Capacity Determined by Six Minute Walk Test
|
70.5 meter
Interval 41.5 to 105.5
|
3.5 meter
Interval -15.1 to 30.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsThrombogenesis, Reduce value is better to the patients
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lipoprotein Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly lipoprotein apheresis
|
Sham Apheresis
n=20 Participants
Three months of weekly sham apheresis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Markers of Thrombogenesis
|
-355 seconds
Interval -738.0 to -88.5
|
36 seconds
Interval -56.0 to 204.0
|
Adverse Events
Lipoprotein Apheresis
Sham Apheresis
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place