Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Trial Proximal Caries Infiltration and Detection (NCT NCT01796106)
NCT ID: NCT01796106
Last Updated: 2023-07-19
Results Overview
Change in categorical lesion depth (progression to next depth category lesion; E1-\>E2-\>D1-\>D2-\>filling) as measured by pairwise comparison of radiographs (baseline versus follow up time point). E1 (lesion within the outer half of enamel), E2 (inner half of enamel), D1 (outer third of dentin), D2 (middle third of dentin).
TERMINATED
NA
12 participants
24 months
2023-07-19
Participant Flow
Subjects were recruited from patients seeking treatment at the Center for Pediatric Dentistry Seattle, Washington, USA. The first participant was enrolled in March 2015 and the last was enrolled in March 2016.
Up to two proximal early caries lesions per participant were included, but only if the second lesion was located in a separate quadrant.
Unit of analysis: Lesions
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Resin Infiltration
After radiographic and scanning fiber endoscope (SFE) imaging to assess lesion depth, the study lesions were treated using the resin infiltrant Icon (DMG, Germany) according to manufactures´ instructions.
|
Fluoride Varnish & Oral Hygiene Instruction
After radiographic and scanning fiber endoscope (SFE) imaging to assess lesion depth oral hygiene instruction and topical fluoridation therapy were provided. For topical fluoridation Duraphat Fluoride Varnish (Colgate, USA) has been used according to manufactures´ instructions.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
5 5
|
7 7
|
|
Overall Study
12 Months Follow up
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5 5
|
7 7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Resin Infiltration
After radiographic and scanning fiber endoscope (SFE) imaging to assess lesion depth, the study lesions were treated using the resin infiltrant Icon (DMG, Germany) according to manufactures´ instructions.
|
Fluoride Varnish & Oral Hygiene Instruction
After radiographic and scanning fiber endoscope (SFE) imaging to assess lesion depth oral hygiene instruction and topical fluoridation therapy were provided. For topical fluoridation Duraphat Fluoride Varnish (Colgate, USA) has been used according to manufactures´ instructions.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Study was terminated due to insufficient recruitment before follow ups could be completed
|
5
|
7
|
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Trial Proximal Caries Infiltration and Detection
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Resin Infiltration
n=5 Lesions
After radiographic and SFE imaging to assess lesion depth, the study lesions were treated using the resin infiltrant Icon (DMG, Germany) according to manufactures´ instructions.
|
Fluoride Varnish & Oral Hygiene Instruction
n=7 Lesions
After radiographic and SFE imaging to assess lesion depth oral hygiene instruction and topical fluoridation therapy were provided. For topical fluoridation Duraphat Fluoride Varnish (Colgate, USA) has been used according to manufactures´ instructions.
|
Total
n=12 Lesions
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Lesion size
E1
|
2 Lesions
n=30 Lesions
|
3 Lesions
n=7 Lesions
|
5 Lesions
n=12 Lesions
|
|
Lesion size
E2
|
2 Lesions
n=30 Lesions
|
4 Lesions
n=7 Lesions
|
6 Lesions
n=12 Lesions
|
|
Lesion size
D1
|
1 Lesions
n=30 Lesions
|
0 Lesions
n=7 Lesions
|
1 Lesions
n=12 Lesions
|
|
Lesion size
D2
|
0 Lesions
n=30 Lesions
|
0 Lesions
n=7 Lesions
|
0 Lesions
n=12 Lesions
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 monthsPopulation: This study was terminated due to insufficient recruitment. The 24 month follow up was not reached for any enrolled participant at the time of termination.
Change in categorical lesion depth (progression to next depth category lesion; E1-\>E2-\>D1-\>D2-\>filling) as measured by pairwise comparison of radiographs (baseline versus follow up time point). E1 (lesion within the outer half of enamel), E2 (inner half of enamel), D1 (outer third of dentin), D2 (middle third of dentin).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0, 12 and 24 monthsPopulation: This study was terminated due to insufficient recruitment. Only 12 (out 50 planned) participants could be recruited and the 12 and 24 month follow ups were not reached for any enrolled participant at the time of termination.
Categorical lesion depth (E1, E2, D1, D2) is measured using SFE imaging. The results are compared to the assessment of categorical lesion depth using radiographic imaging (state of the art method). Outcomes are defined as follows: 1) positive (if SFE imaging gave the same result as the radiograph analysis), 2) negative (if SFE imaging gave a different result as the radiograph analysis) and 3) failure (if lesion depth could not be assessed using SFE imaging). Categorical lesion depth: E1 (lesion within the outer half of enamel), E2 (inner half of enamel), D1 (outer third of dentin), D2 (middle third of dentin).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Resin Infiltration
n=5 Lesions
After radiographic and SFE imaging to assess lesion depth, the study lesions were treated using the resin infiltrant Icon (DMG, Germany) according to manufactures´ instructions.
|
Fluoride Varnish & Oral Hygiene Instruction
n=7 Lesions
After radiographic and SFE imaging to assess lesion depth oral hygiene instruction and topical fluoridation therapy were provided. For topical fluoridation Duraphat Fluoride Varnish (Colgate, USA) has been used according to manufactures´ instructions.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Validation of SFE Imaging for Lesion Size Assessment: SFE Imaging vs. Radiographic Imaging
Baseline · Positive
|
1 Lesions
|
2 Lesions
|
|
Validation of SFE Imaging for Lesion Size Assessment: SFE Imaging vs. Radiographic Imaging
Baseline · Negative
|
1 Lesions
|
2 Lesions
|
|
Validation of SFE Imaging for Lesion Size Assessment: SFE Imaging vs. Radiographic Imaging
Baseline · Failure
|
3 Lesions
|
3 Lesions
|
|
Validation of SFE Imaging for Lesion Size Assessment: SFE Imaging vs. Radiographic Imaging
12 months · Positive
|
0 Lesions
|
0 Lesions
|
|
Validation of SFE Imaging for Lesion Size Assessment: SFE Imaging vs. Radiographic Imaging
12 months · Negative
|
0 Lesions
|
0 Lesions
|
|
Validation of SFE Imaging for Lesion Size Assessment: SFE Imaging vs. Radiographic Imaging
12 months · Failure
|
0 Lesions
|
0 Lesions
|
|
Validation of SFE Imaging for Lesion Size Assessment: SFE Imaging vs. Radiographic Imaging
24 months · Positive
|
0 Lesions
|
0 Lesions
|
|
Validation of SFE Imaging for Lesion Size Assessment: SFE Imaging vs. Radiographic Imaging
24 months · Negative
|
0 Lesions
|
0 Lesions
|
|
Validation of SFE Imaging for Lesion Size Assessment: SFE Imaging vs. Radiographic Imaging
24 months · Failure
|
0 Lesions
|
0 Lesions
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: This study was terminated due to insufficient recruitment. The 12 month follow up was not reached for any enrolled participant at the time of termination.
Change in categorical lesion depth (progression to next depth category lesion; E1-\>E2-\>D1-\>D2-\>filling) as measured by pairwise comparison of radiographs (baseline versus follow up time point). E1 (lesion within the outer half of enamel), E2 (inner half of enamel), D1 (outer third of dentin), D2 (middle third of dentin).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Resin Infiltration
Fluoride Varnish & Oral Hygiene Instruction
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Manager Clinical Research
DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60