Trial Outcomes & Findings for Mechanisms of Sleep Disruption Hyperalgesia (NCT NCT01794689)
NCT ID: NCT01794689
Last Updated: 2019-08-02
Results Overview
The area of secondary hyperalgesia (2HA) to mechanical stimulation was quantified by stimulating along eight linear paths near the capsaicin treated site using a 15 gram nonpainful von Frey filament. Stimulation occurred until the participant reported a change in sensation from which a border was marked on the skin. The degree of 2HA was assessed by measuring the total surface area (mm\^2) of the marked borders. Data were collapsed by group to analyze the effects of FA vs US, irrespective of randomization group. Our Primary Secondary Hyperalgesia outcome was measured prior to injection of either morphine or placebo.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
Next day during quantitative sensory testing after 2 nights of forced awakenings or uninterrupted sleep
2019-08-02
Participant Flow
During screening for the study we evaluated whether participants were generally healthy, pain free, and good sleepers. We screened 255 to obtain 100 participants who met criteria and were randomized to the experimental portion of the study. The experimental phase occurred at an inpatient clinical research unit.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Morphine US Then Morphine FA
Participants randomized to receive Morphine and the Uninterrupted Sleep (US) condition first. After a polysomnography (PSG) screening night, participants were randomized to receive two consecutive nights of uninterrupted sleep (US). With a minimum of a two week washout period, participants then completed the opposing sleep condition of two nights of forced awakenings (FA). They will receive the Morphine injection (0.08mg/kg) via IV bolus over 30 seconds during each experimental quantitative sensory testing session that occurs after the US and FA sleep conditions are completed.
|
Morphine FA Then Morphine US
Participants randomized to receive Morphine and the Forced Awakenings (FA) condition first. After a polysomnography (PSG) screening night, participants were randomized to receive two consecutive nights of forced awakenings (FA). With a minimum of a two week washout period, participants then completed the opposing sleep condition of two nights of uninterrupted sleep (US). They will receive the Morphine injection (0.08mg/kg) via IV bolus over 30 seconds during each experimental quantitative sensory testing session that occurs after the FA and US sleep conditions are completed.
|
Placebo US Then Placebo FA
Participants randomized to receive the saline placebo and the Uninterrupted Sleep (US) condition first. After a polysomnography (PSG) screening night, participants were randomized to receive two consecutive nights of uninterrupted sleep (US). With a minimum of a two week washout period, participants then completed the opposing sleep condition of two nights of forced awakenings (FA). They will receive the injection via IV bolus over 30 seconds during each experimental quantitative sensory testing session that occurs after the US and FA sleep conditions are completed.
|
Placebo FA Then Placebo US
Participants randomized to receive the saline placebo and the Forced Awakenings (FA) condition first. After a polysomnography (PSG) screening night, participants were randomized to receive two consecutive nights of forced awakenings (FA). With a minimum of a two week washout period, participants then completed the opposing sleep condition of two nights of uninterrupted sleep (US). They will receive the injection via IV bolus over 30 seconds during each experimental quantitative sensory testing session that occurs after the FA and US sleep conditions are completed.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intervention 1 (2 Nights)
STARTED
|
25
|
29
|
24
|
22
|
|
Intervention 1 (2 Nights)
COMPLETED
|
20
|
27
|
21
|
18
|
|
Intervention 1 (2 Nights)
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
Washout (2 Weeks)
STARTED
|
20
|
27
|
21
|
18
|
|
Washout (2 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
20
|
27
|
21
|
18
|
|
Washout (2 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Intervention 2 (2 Nights)
STARTED
|
20
|
27
|
21
|
18
|
|
Intervention 2 (2 Nights)
COMPLETED
|
20
|
27
|
21
|
18
|
|
Intervention 2 (2 Nights)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Morphine US Then Morphine FA
Participants randomized to receive Morphine and the Uninterrupted Sleep (US) condition first. After a polysomnography (PSG) screening night, participants were randomized to receive two consecutive nights of uninterrupted sleep (US). With a minimum of a two week washout period, participants then completed the opposing sleep condition of two nights of forced awakenings (FA). They will receive the Morphine injection (0.08mg/kg) via IV bolus over 30 seconds during each experimental quantitative sensory testing session that occurs after the US and FA sleep conditions are completed.
|
Morphine FA Then Morphine US
Participants randomized to receive Morphine and the Forced Awakenings (FA) condition first. After a polysomnography (PSG) screening night, participants were randomized to receive two consecutive nights of forced awakenings (FA). With a minimum of a two week washout period, participants then completed the opposing sleep condition of two nights of uninterrupted sleep (US). They will receive the Morphine injection (0.08mg/kg) via IV bolus over 30 seconds during each experimental quantitative sensory testing session that occurs after the FA and US sleep conditions are completed.
|
Placebo US Then Placebo FA
Participants randomized to receive the saline placebo and the Uninterrupted Sleep (US) condition first. After a polysomnography (PSG) screening night, participants were randomized to receive two consecutive nights of uninterrupted sleep (US). With a minimum of a two week washout period, participants then completed the opposing sleep condition of two nights of forced awakenings (FA). They will receive the injection via IV bolus over 30 seconds during each experimental quantitative sensory testing session that occurs after the US and FA sleep conditions are completed.
|
Placebo FA Then Placebo US
Participants randomized to receive the saline placebo and the Forced Awakenings (FA) condition first. After a polysomnography (PSG) screening night, participants were randomized to receive two consecutive nights of forced awakenings (FA). With a minimum of a two week washout period, participants then completed the opposing sleep condition of two nights of uninterrupted sleep (US). They will receive the injection via IV bolus over 30 seconds during each experimental quantitative sensory testing session that occurs after the FA and US sleep conditions are completed.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intervention 1 (2 Nights)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
|
Intervention 1 (2 Nights)
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Intervention 1 (2 Nights)
Physician Decision
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Intervention 1 (2 Nights)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Mechanisms of Sleep Disruption Hyperalgesia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Morphine US Then Morphine FA
n=25 Participants
Participants randomized to receive Morphine and the Uninterrupted Sleep (US) condition first. After a polysomnography (PSG) screening night, participants were randomized to receive two consecutive nights of uninterrupted sleep (US). With a minimum of a two week washout period, participants then completed the opposing sleep condition of two nights of forced awakenings (FA). They will receive the Morphine injection (0.08mg/kg) via IV bolus over 30 seconds during each experimental quantitative sensory testing session that occurs after the US and FA sleep conditions are completed.
|
Morphine FA Then Morphine US
n=29 Participants
Participants randomized to receive Morphine and the Forced Awakenings (FA) condition first. After a polysomnography (PSG) screening night, participants were randomized to receive two consecutive nights of forced awakenings (FA). With a minimum of a two week washout period, participants then completed the opposing sleep condition of two nights of uninterrupted sleep (US). They will receive the Morphine injection (0.08mg/kg) via IV bolus over 30 seconds during each experimental quantitative sensory testing session that occurs after the FA and US sleep conditions are completed.
|
Placebo US Then Placebo FA
n=24 Participants
Participants randomized to receive the saline placebo and the Uninterrupted Sleep (US) condition first. After a polysomnography (PSG) screening night, participants were randomized to receive two consecutive nights of uninterrupted sleep (US). With a minimum of a two week washout period, participants then completed the opposing sleep condition of two nights of forced awakenings (FA). They will receive the injection via IV bolus over 30 seconds during each experimental quantitative sensory testing session that occurs after the US and FA sleep conditions are completed.
|
Placebo FA Then Placebo US
n=22 Participants
Participants randomized to receive the saline placebo and the Forced Awakenings (FA) condition first. After a polysomnography (PSG) screening night, participants were randomized to receive two consecutive nights of forced awakenings (FA). With a minimum of a two week washout period, participants then completed the opposing sleep condition of two nights of uninterrupted sleep (US). They will receive the injection via IV bolus over 30 seconds during each experimental quantitative sensory testing session that occurs after the FA and US sleep conditions are completed.
|
Total
n=100 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
27.1348 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.97835 • n=5 Participants
|
29.6819 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.54226 • n=7 Participants
|
27.3609 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.22747 • n=5 Participants
|
27.7272 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.18124 • n=4 Participants
|
28.0581 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.81392 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
26.1490 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.16713 • n=5 Participants
|
25.2645 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.95007 • n=7 Participants
|
25.8440 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.63156 • n=5 Participants
|
25.7134 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.17552 • n=4 Participants
|
25.7235 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.93648 • n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Next day during quantitative sensory testing after 2 nights of forced awakenings or uninterrupted sleepThe area of secondary hyperalgesia (2HA) to mechanical stimulation was quantified by stimulating along eight linear paths near the capsaicin treated site using a 15 gram nonpainful von Frey filament. Stimulation occurred until the participant reported a change in sensation from which a border was marked on the skin. The degree of 2HA was assessed by measuring the total surface area (mm\^2) of the marked borders. Data were collapsed by group to analyze the effects of FA vs US, irrespective of randomization group. Our Primary Secondary Hyperalgesia outcome was measured prior to injection of either morphine or placebo.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Morphine US
n=47 Participants
Participants that received morphine with Uninterrupted sleep (US).
|
Morphine FA
n=47 Participants
Participants that received morphine with forced awakenings (FA).
|
Placebo US
n=39 Participants
Participants that received placebo with Uninterrupted sleep (US).
|
Placebo FA
n=39 Participants
Participants that received placebo with forced awakenings (FA).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Spinal Sensitization as Assessed by Area of Secondary Hyperalgesia (2HA) After Two Nights of Uninterrupted Sleep and Two Nights of 8 Forced Awakenings
|
1276.25 mm^2
Standard Deviation 1096.761
|
1582.67 mm^2
Standard Deviation 1590.784
|
1302.93 mm^2
Standard Deviation 1301.457
|
1447.9 mm^2
Standard Deviation 1322.52
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Next day after 2 nights of forced awakenings or uninterrupted sleepPopulation: Each participant had to do four visits and two testing sessions to be termed complete. The data needed for analysis for this outcome measure was obtained from some participants but not all who completed or couldn't complete the entire study. This explains the differences in the number of units analyzed.
After 2 nights of forced awakenings and after two nights of uninterrupted sleep, opioid analgesia will be assessed by an analgesia index. The analgesia index is calculated using withdrawal latency during cold pressor testing (lasting maximum of 300 seconds). Cold Pressor Testing is done before and after morphine or placebo injection. The difference in withdrawal time before and after morphine or placebo injection is the analgesia index with a minimum score of -300 seconds and maximum score of 300 seconds. These data were log transformed. Mean analgesia index was then calculated for each group. Higher means represent greater analgesia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Morphine US
n=48 cold pressor test
Participants that received morphine with Uninterrupted sleep (US).
|
Morphine FA
n=45 cold pressor test
Participants that received morphine with forced awakenings (FA).
|
Placebo US
n=42 cold pressor test
Participants that received placebo with Uninterrupted sleep (US).
|
Placebo FA
n=39 cold pressor test
Participants that received placebo with forced awakenings (FA).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Opioid Analgesia as Assessed by Analgesia Index (Seconds)
|
0.315 seconds (log transformed)
Standard Deviation 0.540
|
0.156 seconds (log transformed)
Standard Deviation 0.712
|
-0.124 seconds (log transformed)
Standard Deviation 0.346
|
-0.006 seconds (log transformed)
Standard Deviation 0.263
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Next day after 2 nights of forced awakenings or uninterrupted sleep, every 60 minutes up to 7 hoursPopulation: For some participants we could not collect blood samples for all time points and testing sessions. This explains the differences in the numbers of samples analyzed at various timepoints.
After 2 nights of forced awakenings, and two nights of uninterrupted sleep, blood is drawn (approximately every 60 minutes) during quantitative sensory testing; 4 hours pre-morphine/placebo administration and 2 hours post-morphine/placebo administration to examine markers of inflammation. Two blood samples for each participant are analyzed at 7 separate time points. The marker of inflammation assessed is the number of peripheral blood mononuclear cells expressing Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and the outcome measure represents the mean change in IL-6 levels pre and post stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Cellular IL-6 expression was was quantified via flow cytometry.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Morphine US
n=265 blood samples
Participants that received morphine with Uninterrupted sleep (US).
|
Morphine FA
n=256 blood samples
Participants that received morphine with forced awakenings (FA).
|
Placebo US
n=225 blood samples
Participants that received placebo with Uninterrupted sleep (US).
|
Placebo FA
n=213 blood samples
Participants that received placebo with forced awakenings (FA).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Percentage of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Expressing Interleukin-6 After LPS Stimulation
Timepoint 1
|
41.98 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 21.18
|
51.82 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 21.13
|
42.91 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 19.53
|
43.32 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 19.04
|
|
Mean Change in Percentage of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Expressing Interleukin-6 After LPS Stimulation
Timepoint 2
|
45.44 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 22.95
|
51.84 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 20.34
|
42.93 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 21.81
|
43.79 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 18.01
|
|
Mean Change in Percentage of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Expressing Interleukin-6 After LPS Stimulation
Timepoint 3
|
45.99 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 19.12
|
48.99 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 18.96
|
40.76 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 20.1
|
41.65 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 21.87
|
|
Mean Change in Percentage of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Expressing Interleukin-6 After LPS Stimulation
Timepoint 4
|
43.96 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 18.2
|
46.94 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 17.81
|
39.06 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 20.48
|
41.34 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 21.36
|
|
Mean Change in Percentage of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Expressing Interleukin-6 After LPS Stimulation
Timepoint 5
|
38.67 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 17.93
|
43.45 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 18.3
|
38.71 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 19.11
|
34.63 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 20.74
|
|
Mean Change in Percentage of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Expressing Interleukin-6 After LPS Stimulation
Timepoint 6
|
36.83 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 19.39
|
39.15 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 21.23
|
35.64 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 18.58
|
36.28 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 19.38
|
|
Mean Change in Percentage of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Expressing Interleukin-6 After LPS Stimulation
Timepoint 7
|
36.47 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 18.9
|
39.92 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 19.6
|
35.49 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 17.03
|
35.25 percentage of IL-6 expression
Standard Deviation 19.35
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Next day during quantitative sensory testing after 2 nights of forced awakenings or uninterrupted sleep.Population: Each participant had to do four visits to be termed complete. The data needed for analysis for this outcome measure was obtained from some participants but not all who completed or couldn't complete the entire study. This explains the differences in the numbers analyzed for each total sleep time.
The degree of sleep deprivation will be assessed by total sleep time (TST) in minutes during the uninterrupted sleep condition compared to the forced awakenings conditions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Morphine US
n=25 Participants
Participants that received morphine with Uninterrupted sleep (US).
|
Morphine FA
n=29 Participants
Participants that received morphine with forced awakenings (FA).
|
Placebo US
n=24 Participants
Participants that received placebo with Uninterrupted sleep (US).
|
Placebo FA
n=22 Participants
Participants that received placebo with forced awakenings (FA).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Sleep Time
TST: Uninterrupted Sleep-Night 1
|
442.8909 minutes
Standard Deviation 23.06461
|
425.0280 minutes
Standard Deviation 52.40921
|
443.2375 minutes
Standard Deviation 38.99631
|
435.1467 minutes
Standard Deviation 29.12669
|
|
Total Sleep Time
TST: Uninterrupted Sleep-Night 2
|
435.2045 minutes
Standard Deviation 41.16120
|
420.1375 minutes
Standard Deviation 71.39364
|
439.0417 minutes
Standard Deviation 47.06713
|
441.1400 minutes
Standard Deviation 35.93814
|
|
Total Sleep Time
TST: Forced Awakenings-Night 1
|
217.4556 minutes
Standard Deviation 46.00094
|
225.4192 minutes
Standard Deviation 38.47452
|
235.1727 minutes
Standard Deviation 50.91526
|
252.0950 minutes
Standard Deviation 32.70550
|
|
Total Sleep Time
TST: Forced Awakenings-Night 2
|
270.3333 minutes
Standard Deviation 35.23125
|
258.1083 minutes
Standard Deviation 29.47026
|
267.7714 minutes
Standard Deviation 16.90080
|
261.9941 minutes
Standard Deviation 32.01372
|
Adverse Events
Morphine US
Morphine FA
Placebo US
Placebo FA
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Morphine US
n=52 participants at risk
Participants that received morphine with Uninterrupted sleep (US).
|
Morphine FA
n=49 participants at risk
Participants that received morphine with forced awakenings (FA).
|
Placebo US
n=42 participants at risk
Participants that received placebo with Uninterrupted sleep (US).
|
Placebo FA
n=43 participants at risk
Participants that received placebo with forced awakenings (FA).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
|
3.8%
2/52 • Number of events 2 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/43 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
11.5%
6/52 • Number of events 8 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
10.2%
5/49 • Number of events 8 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/43 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
7.7%
4/52 • Number of events 5 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
10.2%
5/49 • Number of events 9 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/43 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
5.8%
3/52 • Number of events 3 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 4 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/43 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.8%
3/52 • Number of events 3 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/43 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomach Pain
|
0.00%
0/52 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/43 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
0.00%
0/52 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
2.3%
1/43 • Number of events 1 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Laceration
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/43 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Shortness of Breath
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/43 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/52 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/43 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/52 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/43 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Claustrophobia
|
0.00%
0/52 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
2.3%
1/43 • Number of events 1 • Participants were enrolled and actively participating in the study across a time frame of four years and 7.5 months. With no scheduling difficulties each participant remained in the study for 5-6 weeks.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place