Trial Outcomes & Findings for Traumatic Optic Neuropathy Treatment Trial (TONTT) (NCT NCT01783847)
NCT ID: NCT01783847
Last Updated: 2019-05-07
Results Overview
Best corrected visual acuity will measure at 1,2,3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month and at least 3 months after treatment. Improvement is defined based on 1) mean logMAR\[12\], 2) 0.3 change in logMAR (improvement, deterioration, and no change) \[12,16\] , 3) mean improvement percentage which is calculated as: improvement%= (logMar ( of VA after treatment)-logMar ( of initial VA))/(logMar(20/13)˟-logMar ( of initial VA) 4) percentage of patients at different ordinal categorization of the BCVA as no light perception (NLP), light perception (LP)and hand motion (HM), count fingers (CF), and ≥ 20/200.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
117 participants
Change from baseline at least 3 months after treatment
2019-05-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO)
20,000 unit per day of EPO, Intravenous infusion for three sequential days.
Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO): 4000 units per vial
|
Methylprednisolone
250 mg intravenous injection of Methylprednisolone for 3 days.
|
Observation
No any treatment will be given
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
16
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
85
|
16
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
69
|
15
|
16
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Traumatic Optic Neuropathy Treatment Trial (TONTT)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO)
n=85 Participants
20,000 unit per day of EPO, Intravenous infusion for three sequential days.
Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO): 4000 units per vial
|
Methylprednisolone
n=16 Participants
1 gram per day intravenous injection of Methylprednisolone for 3 days.
|
Observation
n=16 Participants
No any treatment will be given
|
Total
n=117 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
28.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=5 Participants
|
23.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=7 Participants
|
29.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7 • n=5 Participants
|
27.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
103 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Iran, Islamic Republic of
|
85 participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
117 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from baseline at least 3 months after treatmentPopulation: Seventeen patients with incomplete follow up and not following the treatment protocol were also excluded during the study. There were 100 patients (100 eyes) who completed the study protocol
Best corrected visual acuity will measure at 1,2,3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month and at least 3 months after treatment. Improvement is defined based on 1) mean logMAR\[12\], 2) 0.3 change in logMAR (improvement, deterioration, and no change) \[12,16\] , 3) mean improvement percentage which is calculated as: improvement%= (logMar ( of VA after treatment)-logMar ( of initial VA))/(logMar(20/13)˟-logMar ( of initial VA) 4) percentage of patients at different ordinal categorization of the BCVA as no light perception (NLP), light perception (LP)and hand motion (HM), count fingers (CF), and ≥ 20/200.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO)
n=69 Participants
Intravenous EPO 10,000 IU for 5-13 years of age and 20,000 IU for \>13 years/ day for 3 days
Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO): 4000 units per vial
|
Methylprednisolone
n=15 Participants
Just Intravenous Methyl prednisolone 250 mg every 6 hours for 3 days.
Methyl prednisolone: 250 mg every 6 hours for 3 days.
|
Observation
n=16 Participants
Observation
Observation: Just observation
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Change/Improvement Visual Acuity From the Beseline
|
28 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from baseline at least 3 months after treatmentPopulation: Seventeen patients dropped out of the study due to incomplete follow-up (16 patients from EPO and one patient from Methylprednisolone group)
A positive RAPD means there are differences between the two eyes in the afferent pathway due to retinal or optic nerve disease. Graded from +1 to +4. The higher one is a better grade
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO)
n=69 Participants
Intravenous EPO 10,000 IU for 5-13 years of age and 20,000 IU for \>13 years/ day for 3 days
Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO): 4000 units per vial
|
Methylprednisolone
n=15 Participants
Just Intravenous Methyl prednisolone 250 mg every 6 hours for 3 days.
Methyl prednisolone: 250 mg every 6 hours for 3 days.
|
Observation
n=16 Participants
Observation
Observation: Just observation
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Relative Afferent Papillary Defect (RAPD) Grade +4
|
26 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO)
Methylprednisolone
Observation
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli
Iran university of Medical Sciences
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place