A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of ASKP1240 in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

NCT ID: NCT01780844

Last Updated: 2025-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

149 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-05

Study Completion Date

2017-01-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASKP1240, an anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, for the prophylaxis of organ rejection after kidney transplantation. This study will compare the efficacy of basiliximab induction, ASKP1240, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids \[calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) avoidance\] to the standard of care immunosuppressive regimen (basiliximab induction + tacrolimus + MMF + steroids). In addition, the study will compare the efficacy of basiliximab induction, ASKP1240, tacrolimus and steroids \[CNI minimization-MMF avoidance\] to the standard of care immunosuppressive regimen (basiliximab induction + tacrolimus + MMF + steroids).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subjects will be followed for 6 months. Upon completion of the first 6 months of the study, subjects may participate in the Long Term Extension period of the study. Subjects will remain on their original treatment arm up to three years post-transplant (and / or Sponsor discontinues development or the subject no longer wishes to participate in the study).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Kidney Transplantation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard of Care

Basiliximab induction + Tacrolimus + MMF + Corticosteroids

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tacrolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous or oral

Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous or oral

Basiliximab

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous

Methylprednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous

Prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral

CNI avoidance

Basiliximab induction + ASKP1240 + MMF + Corticosteroids

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ASKP1240

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous infusion

Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous or oral

Basiliximab

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous

Methylprednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous

Prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral

CNI minimization-MMF avoidance

Basiliximab induction + ASKP1240 + Tacrolimus + Corticosteroids

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ASKP1240

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous infusion

Tacrolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous or oral

Basiliximab

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous

Methylprednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous

Prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ASKP1240

intravenous infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus

intravenous or oral

Intervention Type DRUG

Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)

intravenous or oral

Intervention Type DRUG

Basiliximab

intravenous

Intervention Type DRUG

Methylprednisone

Intravenous

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone

Oral

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Prograf® CellCept® Simulect®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject is a recipient of a de novo kidney from a living or deceased donor

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject has induction therapy, other than study-assigned basiliximab, planned as part of initial immunosuppressive regimen
* Subject has previously received or is receiving an organ transplant other than a kidney
* Subject will receive a solitary kidney from a deceased donor \< 5 years of age
* Subject will receive a kidney with an anticipated cold ischemia time (CIT) of \> 30 hours
* Subject will receive a kidney that meets both Extended Criteria Donor (ECD) and Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) criteria. Note: a kidney that meets either ECD or DCD criteria is eligible for inclusion
* Subject will receive an ABO incompatible donor kidney
* Subject has a current calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) level \>50%
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Senior Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Site US10006

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Site US10024

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site US10008

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Site US10021

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Site US10030

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Site US10004

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Site US10003

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Site US10013

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Site US10007

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Site US10041

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Site US10010

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Site US10018

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Site US10037

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Site US10015

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Site US10045

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Site US10014

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Site US10017

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Site US10025

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Site US10022

Livingston, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Site US10031

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Site US10034

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Site US10023

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Site US10019

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Site US10036

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site US10042

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site US10016

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site US10026

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site US10009

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Site US10040

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Site US10032

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Site US10027

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Site US10038

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Site US10012

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site US10028

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site US10035

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site US10001

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site US10002

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site US10029

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site US10044

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site US10033

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Site US10020

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Site US10005

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Harland RC, Klintmalm G, Jensik S, Yang H, Bromberg J, Holman J, Kumar MSA, Santos V, Larson TJ, Wang X. Efficacy and safety of bleselumab in kidney transplant recipients: A phase 2, randomized, open-label, noninferiority study. Am J Transplant. 2020 Jan;20(1):159-171. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15591. Epub 2019 Oct 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31509331 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/study/7163-CL-0108/

Link to results and other applicable study documents on the Astellas Clinical Trials website

https://www.trialsummaries.com/Study/StudyDetails?id=25564&tenant=MT_AST_9011

Link to plain language summary of the study on the Trial Results Summaries website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

7163-CL-0108

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.