Efficacy and Safety of Heparin-grafted Membrane for CRRT

NCT ID: NCT01779635

Last Updated: 2017-05-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators hypothesize that the use of heparin-grafted membrane versus conventional membrane in critically-ill patients with bleeding-risk undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy, will effectively prolong the circuit lifespan, without worsening of the systemic APTT or underlying bleeding risk.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aims and objectives:

We aim to compare the performance and safety of heparin-grafted AN69 membrane (oXiris, Gambro) with the conventional AN69 membrane (M150, Gambro) without systemic anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), who has moderate bleeding risk and in whom systemic anticoagulation is contraindicated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Kidney Injury Hemorrhage Coagulopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Randomized initiation with oXiris versus M150 (conventional filter), with cross-over for subsequent circuits.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

oXiris as first filter

Start off the first CRRT circuit with oXiris, then cross-over to M150, then oXiris, then back to M150

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

oXiris as first filter

Intervention Type DEVICE

2 arms - each start off CRRT with either oXiris or M150 as first hemofilter, and then do cross-over to either hemofilters in a sequential manner when the former clots

M150 as first filter

Patients in M150 arm will start off with M150 as first filter for CRRT, then cross-over to oXiris after the former clots, then back to M150, then to oXiris.

Group Type OTHER

M150 as first filter

Intervention Type DEVICE

start off with M150 as first hemofilter, then cross-over to oXiris when former clots, and then to M150, and then lastly to oXiris

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

oXiris as first filter

2 arms - each start off CRRT with either oXiris or M150 as first hemofilter, and then do cross-over to either hemofilters in a sequential manner when the former clots

Intervention Type DEVICE

M150 as first filter

start off with M150 as first hemofilter, then cross-over to oXiris when former clots, and then to M150, and then lastly to oXiris

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Adult patients (age 21 and above) who are admitted to ICUs or CCU and requiring CRRT for acute kidney injury or ESRD Patients who has moderate bleeding risk (see below definitions) Patients with NO systemic or regional circuit anticoagulation Informed consent taken from the patient, or proxy if the former is unable to sign due to medical reasons Anticipated need for prolonged CRRT \> 3 days

(Moderate bleeding risk criteria:)

Moderate bleeding risk is defined by any of the following:

1. Platelet count \< 100 x 109 mm3 (but \> 50)
2. INR \> 1.5 (but \< 2.5)
3. APTT \> 50 seconds (but \< 75)
4. Post-surgery for \< 48 hours
5. Post-invasive procedures (eg. Pericardiocentasis) \< 24 hrs
6. Post major artery puncture or catheter removal from major arteries (carotids, subclavian, or femoral) \< 24 hours
7. Recent internal or gastrointestinal bleeding within 48 hours (should be secured bleeding with no relapse noted)
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National University Hospital, Singapore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Horng-Ruey Chua, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National University Health System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National University Hospital

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schetz M, Van Cromphaut S, Dubois J, Van den Berghe G. Does the surface-treated AN69 membrane prolong filter survival in CRRT without anticoagulation? Intensive Care Med. 2012 Nov;38(11):1818-25. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2633-x. Epub 2012 Jul 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22773036 (View on PubMed)

Uchino S, Fealy N, Baldwin I, Morimatsu H, Bellomo R. Continuous is not continuous: the incidence and impact of circuit "down-time" on uraemic control during continuous veno-venous haemofiltration. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Apr;29(4):575-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1672-8. Epub 2003 Feb 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12577144 (View on PubMed)

Evenepoel P, Dejagere T, Verhamme P, Claes K, Kuypers D, Bammens B, Vanrenterghem Y. Heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane versus regional citrate anticoagulation: a prospective randomized study of 2 anticoagulation strategies in patients at risk of bleeding. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 May;49(5):642-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.02.001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17472846 (View on PubMed)

Tan HK, Baldwin I, Bellomo R. Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration without anticoagulation in high-risk patients. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Nov;26(11):1652-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340000691.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11193272 (View on PubMed)

Chua HR, Baldwin I, Bailey M, Subramaniam A, Bellomo R. Circuit lifespan during continuous renal replacement therapy for combined liver and kidney failure. J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):744.e7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.08.016. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23102533 (View on PubMed)

Tsujimoto Y, Miki S, Shimada H, Tsujimoto H, Yasuda H, Kataoka Y, Fujii T. Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD013330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013330.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34519356 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NKFRC/2012/01/11

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DSRB 2012/02222

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fibrinogen Early In Severe Trauma StudY II
NCT05449834 RECRUITING PHASE3
Factor Replacement in Surgery
NCT04114643 UNKNOWN PHASE2