Image Content Analysis of Dural-axis Rotational Versus Standard Coronary Angiography

NCT ID: NCT01776866

Last Updated: 2015-06-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators hypothesized that dual-axis rotational coronary angiography was non-inferior to standard coronary angiography with respect to diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The prior studies have demonstrated that dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) is associated with lower contrast usage and radiation exposure compared with standard coronary angiography (SA). Single-axis rotational coronary angiography (RA) has been proved by previous studies without any reduction in diagnostic accuracy compared to SA. However, the rotational protocol is obvious different between DARCA and single-axis RA. A recent study has assessed the diagnostic accuracy of DARCA, but this study was not designed for image content analysis and the number of patients included did not provide sufficient statistical power to allow a valid comparison of DARCA with SA. The diagnostic accuracy of DARCA aroused our attention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Coronary Angiography Rotational Coronary Angiography Contrast Media Radiation Quantitative Coronary Angiography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Coronary Angiography

Patient first undergo standard coronary angiography(SA) of either left or right coronary system followed by dual-axis rotational coronary angiography(DARCA). The SA protocol consist of six different projections (right anterior oblique (RAO)-caudal, RAO-cranial (CRA), left anterior oblique (LAO)-CRA, LAO-caudal (CAU), antero-posterior (AP)-CRA and AP-CAU) for left coronary artery (LCA) and two projections (LAO and AP-cranial) for right coronary artery (RCA).

The DARCA protocol consist of two coronary acquisitions specified by the protocol: one for LCA (Swing LCA CRA 35 5.8s), another for RCA (Swing RCA AP 4.0s).

Group Type OTHER

Coronary Angiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Coronary angiography include standard coronary angiography (SA) and dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA). Patient first undergo SA of either left or right coronary system followed by DARCA.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Coronary Angiography

Coronary angiography include standard coronary angiography (SA) and dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA). Patient first undergo SA of either left or right coronary system followed by DARCA.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age\>18 years old, \<80 years old
* a clinical indication for diagnostic coronary angiography to evaluate possible coronary artery disease

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Known allergy to iodinated contrast
* Patients who had received iodinated contrast material within the last week or were unable to give consent
* Renal insufficiency (\>1.5mg/dL)
* Acute myocardial infarction within one week
* Cardiogenic shock
* heart function worse than New York Heart Association functional class III
* Left main coronary artery disease
* Prior coronary artery bypass graft treatment
* Prior percutaneous coronary intervention treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

General Hospital of Chinese Armed Police Forces

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Liu Huiliang, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces

Jin Zhigeng, M.M.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces

Yang Shengli, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces

Luo Jianping, M.M.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces

Ma Dongxing, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces

Liu Ying, M.M.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces

Han Wei, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces

Jing Limin, B.S.M.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Garcia JA, Agostoni P, Green NE, Maddux JT, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Groves BM, Van Den Heuvel P, Verheye S, Van Langenhove G, Vermeersch P, Van den Branden F, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD, Carroll JD. Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May 1;73(6):753-61. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21918.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19180661 (View on PubMed)

Klein AJ, Garcia JA, Hudson PA, Kim MS, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Wink O, Hattler B, Tsai TT, Chen SY, Hansgen A, Carroll JD. Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May 1;77(6):820-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22804. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20853352 (View on PubMed)

Liu HL, Jin ZG, Yang SL, Luo JP, Ma DX, Liu Y, Han W. Randomized study on the safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography in. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Mar;125(6):1016-22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22613524 (View on PubMed)

Jin ZG, Bai R, Li Y, Yang Y, Han W, Zhao Q, Zhang L, Liu HL. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Feb;36(2):187-195. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01711-9. Epub 2019 Oct 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31628576 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20130101

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

20130101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id