Trial Outcomes & Findings for Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Pancreatitis (NCT NCT01774604)
NCT ID: NCT01774604
Last Updated: 2016-11-04
Results Overview
Number of patients who developed pancreatitis following ERCP based on Atlanta Classification
TERMINATED
PHASE3
449 participants
From randomization to 30 days after ERCP
2016-11-04
Participant Flow
All patients who presented to Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for any reason between March 2013 and December 2014
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Indomethacin
Indomethacin 100 mg Per Rectum (PR) x 1 in peri-procedural period
Indomethacin: 100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1
|
Placebo
Placebo suppositories (#2)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
223
|
226
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
223
|
226
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Pancreatitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Indomethacin
n=223 Participants
Indomethacin 100 mg PR x 1 in peri-procedural period
Indomethacin: 100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1
|
Placebo
n=226 Participants
Placebo suppositories (#2)
Placebo
|
Total
n=449 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Previous ERCP
No
|
142 participants
n=5 Participants
|
147 participants
n=7 Participants
|
289 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Difficult Cannulation
Yes
|
46 participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 participants
n=7 Participants
|
88 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.7 • n=5 Participants
|
64.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1 • n=7 Participants
|
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
118 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
118 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
236 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
108 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
213 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Acute Cholangitis
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Choledocholithiasis
|
59 participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 participants
n=7 Participants
|
111 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Malignant Biliary Obstruction
|
53 participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 participants
n=7 Participants
|
103 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Biliary Stent Change
|
25 participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Biliary Leak
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Increased Liver Tests/Jaundice
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Pancreatic Stricture
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Suspected Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction (SOD)
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Pancreatic Leak/Disruption
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Pancreatic Duct Stone
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Ampullectomy
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication
Other
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 participants
n=7 Participants
|
47 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Yes
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of post-ERCP Pancreatitis
No
|
214 participants
n=5 Participants
|
217 participants
n=7 Participants
|
431 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of Previous Sphincterotomy
Yes
|
72 participants
n=5 Participants
|
71 participants
n=7 Participants
|
143 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of Previous Sphincterotomy
No
|
151 participants
n=5 Participants
|
155 participants
n=7 Participants
|
306 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Previous ERCP
Yes
|
81 participants
n=5 Participants
|
79 participants
n=7 Participants
|
160 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Difficult Cannulation
No
|
177 participants
n=5 Participants
|
184 participants
n=7 Participants
|
361 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Precut Biliary Sphincterotomy
Yes
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Precut Biliary Sphincterotomy
No
|
212 participants
n=5 Participants
|
210 participants
n=7 Participants
|
422 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Therapeutic Biliary Sphincterotomy
Yes
|
106 participants
n=5 Participants
|
114 participants
n=7 Participants
|
220 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Therapeutic Biliary Sphincterotomy
No
|
117 participants
n=5 Participants
|
112 participants
n=7 Participants
|
229 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Therapeutic Pancreatic Sphincterotomy
Yes
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Therapeutic Pancreatic Sphincterotomy
No
|
211 participants
n=5 Participants
|
221 participants
n=7 Participants
|
432 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Minor Duct Sphincterotomy
Yes
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Minor Duct Sphincterotomy
No
|
218 participants
n=5 Participants
|
222 participants
n=7 Participants
|
440 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Balloon Dilation of Biliary Sphincter
Yes
|
21 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=7 Participants
|
41 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Balloon Dilation of Biliary Sphincter
No
|
202 participants
n=5 Participants
|
206 participants
n=7 Participants
|
408 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Wire Cannulation of Pancreatic Duct
Yes
|
90 participants
n=5 Participants
|
89 participants
n=7 Participants
|
179 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Wire Cannulation of Pancreatic Duct
No
|
133 participants
n=5 Participants
|
137 participants
n=7 Participants
|
270 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pancreatography
Yes
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
49 participants
n=7 Participants
|
99 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pancreatography
No
|
173 participants
n=5 Participants
|
177 participants
n=7 Participants
|
350 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pancreatic Acinarization
Yes
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pancreatic Acinarization
No
|
218 participants
n=5 Participants
|
222 participants
n=7 Participants
|
440 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Biliary Strent Placement
Yes
|
89 participants
n=5 Participants
|
84 participants
n=7 Participants
|
173 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Biliary Strent Placement
No
|
134 participants
n=5 Participants
|
142 participants
n=7 Participants
|
276 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pancreatic Stent Placement
Yes
|
36 participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 participants
n=7 Participants
|
71 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pancreatic Stent Placement
No
|
187 participants
n=5 Participants
|
191 participants
n=7 Participants
|
378 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Trainee Involvement
Yes
|
152 participants
n=5 Participants
|
168 participants
n=7 Participants
|
320 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Trainee Involvement
No
|
71 participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 participants
n=7 Participants
|
129 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Concomitant Endoscopic Ultrasound with Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS/FNA)
Yes
|
41 participants
n=5 Participants
|
40 participants
n=7 Participants
|
81 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Concomitant Endoscopic Ultrasound with Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS/FNA)
No
|
182 participants
n=5 Participants
|
186 participants
n=7 Participants
|
368 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Periprocedural Fluid Volume
|
705 Milliliters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 335 • n=5 Participants
|
703 Milliliters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 355 • n=7 Participants
|
704 Milliliters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 345 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization to 30 days after ERCPPopulation: Patient who randomized into the study and received either rectal indomethacin or placebo
Number of patients who developed pancreatitis following ERCP based on Atlanta Classification
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Indomethacin
n=223 Participants
Indomethacin 100 mg PR x 1 in peri-procedural period
Indomethacin: 100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1
|
Placebo
n=226 Participants
Placebo suppositories (#2)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Who Developed Acute Pancreatitis
|
16 participants
|
11 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization to 30 days after ERCPPopulation: Assess the number of patients who developed severe acute pancreatitis
Number of patients with severe acute pancreatitis based on the Atlanta Classification
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Indomethacin
n=223 Participants
Indomethacin 100 mg PR x 1 in peri-procedural period
Indomethacin: 100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1
|
Placebo
n=226 Participants
Placebo suppositories (#2)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Who Developed Severe Pancreatitis
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization to 30 days after ERCPNumber of patients with moderately severe pancreatitis based on Atlanta Classification
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Indomethacin
n=223 Participants
Indomethacin 100 mg PR x 1 in peri-procedural period
Indomethacin: 100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1
|
Placebo
n=226 Participants
Placebo suppositories (#2)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Who Developed Moderately Severe Pancreatitis
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization to 30 days after ERCPNumber of patient who developed mild acute pancreatitis based on the Atlanta Classification
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Indomethacin
n=223 Participants
Indomethacin 100 mg PR x 1 in peri-procedural period
Indomethacin: 100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1
|
Placebo
n=226 Participants
Placebo suppositories (#2)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Who Developed Mild Pancreatitis
|
16 participants
|
9 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization to 30 days after ERCPNumber of patients who developed any type of gastrointestinal bleeding from time of ERCP to 30 days post procedure
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Indomethacin
n=223 Participants
Indomethacin 100 mg PR x 1 in peri-procedural period
Indomethacin: 100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1
|
Placebo
n=226 Participants
Placebo suppositories (#2)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Who Developed Gastrointestinal Bleeding
|
4 participants
|
6 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization to 30 days after ERCPNumber of patients who died from any cause from the time of ERCP until 30 days post-procedure
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Indomethacin
n=223 Participants
Indomethacin 100 mg PR x 1 in peri-procedural period
Indomethacin: 100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1
|
Placebo
n=226 Participants
Placebo suppositories (#2)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patient Deaths
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization until 30 days after ERCPNumber of patients admitted to the hospital for any cause following ERCP
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Indomethacin
n=223 Participants
Indomethacin 100 mg PR x 1 in peri-procedural period
Indomethacin: 100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1
|
Placebo
n=226 Participants
Placebo suppositories (#2)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With 30 Days Hospital Re-admission
|
31 participants
|
20 participants
|
Adverse Events
Indomethacin
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Indomethacin
n=223 participants at risk
Indomethacin 100 mg PR x 1 in peri-procedural period
Indomethacin: 100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1
|
Placebo
n=226 participants at risk
Placebo suppositories (#2)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Severe Acute Pancreatitis Leading to Death
|
0.00%
0/223 • From randomization to 30 days after ERCP
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to 30 days after ERCP
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Secondary Bacterial Peritonitis due to Multifocal Hepatocellular Carcinoma Leading to Death
|
0.00%
0/223 • From randomization to 30 days after ERCP
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to 30 days after ERCP
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration Post-Procedure Leading to Death
|
0.00%
0/223 • From randomization to 30 days after ERCP
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to 30 days after ERCP
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Indomethacin
n=223 participants at risk
Indomethacin 100 mg PR x 1 in peri-procedural period
Indomethacin: 100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1
|
Placebo
n=226 participants at risk
Placebo suppositories (#2)
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Bleeding
|
1.8%
4/223 • Number of events 4 • From randomization to 30 days after ERCP
|
2.7%
6/226 • Number of events 6 • From randomization to 30 days after ERCP
|
Additional Information
John M. Levenick
Penn State Hershey Medical Center/Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place