Trial of Rituximab and Mycophenolate Mofetil Without Oral Steroids for Lupus Nephritis
NCT ID: NCT01773616
Last Updated: 2018-02-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Although randomized placebo controlled trials of Rituximab in non-renal lupus and lupus nephritis did not meet their primary end-points, there is accumulating data that suggests that B cell depletion with Rituximab may be efficacious in lupus disease refractory to conventional therapy. Furthermore, our pilot data suggests that the addition of Rituximab to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) without oral steroids is at least as effective at inducing a renal response as the standard of care therapy comprising MMF and high dose oral corticosteroids.
RITUXILUP is a proof of concept, open labeled, randomized, controlled, multicentre trial that aims to demonstrate whether the addition of Rituximab to MMF therapy is useful in treating a new flare of lupus nephritis and whether it has a long lasting steroid-sparing, beneficial effect with equal efficacy and greater safety than a conventional regimen of MMF and oral prednisolone. If successful, this trial has the potential to dramatically change the management of lupus nephritis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Induction Therapy for Lupus Nephritis With no Added Oral Steroids: A Trial Comparing Oral Corticosteroids Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Versus Obinutuzumab and MMF
NCT04702256
Open Label Pilot Trial of Rituximab in Lupus Membranous Nephritis
NCT00908986
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Subjects With International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) 2003 Class III or IV Lupus Nephritis
NCT00282347
Effectiveness of Mycophenolate Mofetil Combined With Tacrolimus for Steroid Tapering in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
NCT05916781
TNF Blockade With Remicade in Active Lupus Nephritis WHO Class V (TRIAL )
NCT00368264
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
TITLE RITUXILUP - An open label randomised multicentre controlled trial of RITUXImab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) without oral steroids for the treatment of LUPus nephritis
OBJECTIVES
1. Is the combination of Rituximab, Methyl prednisolone and MMF as effective in treating lupus nephritis as Methyl prednisolone, oral steroids and MMF?
2. Does the omission of oral steroids increase the safety of the treatment regimen?
DESIGN This is a 1:1 randomised, international open label, controlled phase III multicentre trial
SAMPLE SIZE A total of 252 patients: 126 patients in each arm (As of April 2017 decided 25 patients will be maximum recruited following decision to close the study early)
ELIGIBILITY Children (12 years and above) and adults with lupus nephritis ISN/RPS Class III A or A/C, Class IV-G A or A/C, Class IV-S A or A/C, and/or Class V with a urine protein/creatinine ratio (PCR) ≥ 100mg/mmol.
TREATMENT
1. Experimental group - Rituximab, IV methyl prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil
2. Control group - oral prednisolone, IV methyl prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil.
PRIMARY OUTCOME The primary outcome is to demonstrate non-inferiority of the Rituximab arm in comparison to the control arm in the proportion of patients achieving complete renal response (CR) at week 52 without the need for steroid prescription.
SECONDARY OUTCOMES
Safety outcomes:
* Serious Infectious Episodes
* Serious Adverse Events
* Evidence of metabolic abnormalities particularly new onset diabetes
Disease control over time:
* Proportion of patients achieving Partial Response (PR)
* Time to stable CR
* Time to PR
* Proportion of patients in PR who achieve histological remission in those who have a repeat biopsy as part of local standard of care
* Proportion of patients with renal or extra flare
* Cumulative steroid exposure
* Deviation from the steroid taper in the steroid arm and/or introduction of steroids in the steroid-free arm
* Proportion of patients achieving a response as defined by the SLE Responder Index (SRI) at week 52 and annually thereafter as defined by:
* a \>4 point reduction in SELENA-SLEDAI score;
* no new BILAG A organ domain score;
* no more than I new BILAG B score;
* no worsening in physician's global assessment (PGA) by \>10%;
* must not have received non-protocol treatment.
* Proportion of patients achieving a response as defined by the BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) at week 52 and annually thereafter as defined by: BILAG-2004 improvement (BILAG A to B/C/D, BILAG B to C/D and no BILAG worsening, no deterioration in SLEDAI total score, no worsening in physician's global assessment (PGA) by \>10% and must not have received non-protocol treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rituximab
Rituximab, methyl prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil
Rituximab
Mycophenolate mofetil
Methyl prednisolone
Oral prednisolone
Oral prednisolone, methyl prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil
Oral prednisolone
Mycophenolate mofetil
Methyl prednisolone
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Oral prednisolone
Rituximab
Mycophenolate mofetil
Methyl prednisolone
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Severe "critical" SLE flare defined as:
1. BILAG 2004 A flare in CNS system
2. or any SLE manifestation requiring more immunosuppression than allowed within the protocol in the physician's opinion
3. Pregnant or lactating. Woman who have child bearing potential must have two negative pregnancy test results with a sensitivity of ≥ 25 mIU/mL: one from a serum pregnancy test at day -8 to day -10 of screening and another from a urine pregnancy test at day 1 prior to randomisation. If the timeline is shortened because of clinical urgency, then there must be a negative serum pregnancy test with a sensitivity of ≥ 25 mIU/mL within 1-2 days before study start
4. Patients not willing for their GP to be informed of their participation in this study
5. Patients should not be on or require maintenance steroids and should not have had more than 12 weeks of steroids in the period immediately preceding recruitment irrespective of dose
6. Patients that had received more than 2.0g of IV methyl prednisolone in the previous 4 weeks
7. Prior use within 12 months of screening visit of therapeutic monoclonal antibody, or B or T cell modulating 'biologic' use
8. Prior use within 6 months of the screening visit of Intravenous immunoglobulin / plasma exchange OR Cyclophosphamide
9. Active infections, including but not limited to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and hepatitis B (including prior infection as judged by positive Hepatitis B core antibody) or Hepatitis C or tuberculosis
10. Receipt of a live-attenuated vaccine within 3 months of study enrolment
11. In the investigator's opinion, patients that are at high risk for infection (including but not limited to indwelling catheter, dysphagia with aspiration, decubitus ulcer, history of prior aspiration pneumonia or recurrent severe urinary tract infection)
12. Prior history of invasive fungal infections
13. History of any cancer
14. In female patients, known history of cervical dysplasia CIN Grade III cervical high risk human papillomavirus or abnormal cervical cytology other than abnormal squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) within the past 3 years. The patient will be eligible after the condition has resolved (e.g., follow-up HPV test is negative or cervical abnormality has been effectively treated \>1 year ago)
15. Any concomitant medical condition or abnormal blood results that in the investigator's opinion, or after discussion with the CI, places the participant at risk by participating in this study.
16. Comorbidities requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy.
17. Current substance abuse.
12 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Ohio State University
OTHER
Dutch Working Party on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
UNKNOWN
EULAR Lupus Nephritis Trial Network Study Group
UNKNOWN
Imperial College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Liz Lightstone, Dr
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Imperial College London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
Chapel Allerton Hospital, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Leeds, , United Kingdom
Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Leicester, , United Kingdom
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
King's College Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Oxford, , United Kingdom
Royal Stoke Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
Stoke-on-Trent, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
If Rituximab together with MMF is shown to be as good as standard treatment with MMF and oral steroids, it would be the first time in 60 years that patients with lupus nephritis could be spared the burden of long term steroids.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRO2035
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.