Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of Intra-articular Injection of Autologous Protein Solution ("APS(TM)") for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis (OA) (NCT NCT01773226)
NCT ID: NCT01773226
Last Updated: 2018-02-05
Results Overview
Safety and tolerability will be assessed from AEs and injection-site reactions, physical examinations, knee examinations, vital signs, ECGs, and clinical laboratory tests (hematology, coagulation, blood chemistry, and urinalysis) evaluated at baseline (pre-injection) and post-injection up to 6 months.
COMPLETED
NA
11 participants
Up to 6 months post-injection
2018-02-05
Participant Flow
Single-centre study in the Netherlands. FPI April 2013.
All patients treated with APS who had at least 1 post-injection assessment of clinical outcomes were to be included in the clinical outcomes population, which was used for the clinical outcomes summaries and listings
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)"
Patients who have been treated with a single, intra-articular injection.
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)": A therapy prepared at the point-of-care from a small sample of the patient's own blood containing high concentrations of anti-inflammatory and anabolic proteins
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)"
Patients who have been treated with a single, intra-articular injection.
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)": A therapy prepared at the point-of-care from a small sample of the patient's own blood containing high concentrations of anti-inflammatory and anabolic proteins
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluation of Intra-articular Injection of Autologous Protein Solution ("APS(TM)") for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis (OA)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)"
n=11 Participants
Patients who have been treated with a single, intra-articular injection.
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)": A therapy prepared at the point-of-care from a small sample of the patient's own blood containing high concentrations of anti-inflammatory and anabolic proteins
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 6 months post-injectionPopulation: In cases where a patient reported multiple occurrences of an AE, the first occurrence of the worst reported case of the event was to be used for the purpose of analysis.
Safety and tolerability will be assessed from AEs and injection-site reactions, physical examinations, knee examinations, vital signs, ECGs, and clinical laboratory tests (hematology, coagulation, blood chemistry, and urinalysis) evaluated at baseline (pre-injection) and post-injection up to 6 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)"
n=11 Participants
Patients who have been treated with a single, intra-articular injection.
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)": A therapy prepared at the point-of-care from a small sample of the patient's own blood containing high concentrations of anti-inflammatory and anabolic proteins
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Adverse Events
|
22 Adverse Events (AEs)
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 6 months post-injectionPopulation: The incidence of patients using rescue medication for OA pain.
Explore the potential for an analgesic effect of a single dose of APS in patients with OA of the knee.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)"
n=11 Participants
Patients who have been treated with a single, intra-articular injection.
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)": A therapy prepared at the point-of-care from a small sample of the patient's own blood containing high concentrations of anti-inflammatory and anabolic proteins
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Using Rescue Medication
Injection visit
|
2 Frequency of Patients using Rescue medic
|
|
Number of Patients Using Rescue Medication
Month 6
|
2 Frequency of Patients using Rescue medic
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, and at Months 1, 3, and 6.Population: Results of the WOMAC LK 3.1 questionnaire (pain, stiffness, and functionality subscores) were summarized by timepoint.
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire using the Likert scale (WOMAC LK), Version 3.1 questionnaire has 24 items that the patient addresses about the knee: 5 items on the pain subscale, 2 on the stiffness subscale, and 17 on the physical function subscale. Each item was to be answered on a 5-point Likert scale, with grading from 0 (none or never) to 4 (extreme or always). The scores are summed for items in each subscale, with possible ranges as follows: pain=0-20, stiffness=0-8, physical function=0-68. A higher score indicates worse pain, stiffness, or functional limitation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)"
n=11 Participants
Patients who have been treated with a single, intra-articular injection.
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)": A therapy prepared at the point-of-care from a small sample of the patient's own blood containing high concentrations of anti-inflammatory and anabolic proteins
|
|---|---|
|
Pain Score
Baseline
|
12 Scores on a WOMAC pain scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
|
Pain Score
Week 1
|
8.2 Scores on a WOMAC pain scale
Standard Deviation 5.1
|
|
Pain Score
Week 2
|
6.5 Scores on a WOMAC pain scale
Standard Deviation 4.7
|
|
Pain Score
Month 1
|
4.5 Scores on a WOMAC pain scale
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
|
Pain Score
Month 3
|
3.0 Scores on a WOMAC pain scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
|
Pain Score
Month 6
|
3.1 Scores on a WOMAC pain scale
Standard Deviation 4.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, and at Months 1, 3, and 6.Population: Results of the WOMAC LK 3.1 questionnaire (pain, stiffness, and functionality subscores) were summarized by timepoint.
Changed Outcome Measure Description to: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire using the Likert scale (WOMAC LK), Version 3.1 questionnaire has 24 items that the patient addresses about the knee: 5 items on the pain subscale, 2 on the stiffness subscale, and 17 on the physical function subscale. Each item was to be answered on a 5-point Likert scale, with grading from 0 (none or never) to 4 (extreme or always). The scores are summed for items in each subscale, with possible ranges as follows: pain=0-20, stiffness=0-8, physical function=0-68. A higher score indicates worse pain, stiffness, or functional limitation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)"
n=11 Participants
Patients who have been treated with a single, intra-articular injection.
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)": A therapy prepared at the point-of-care from a small sample of the patient's own blood containing high concentrations of anti-inflammatory and anabolic proteins
|
|---|---|
|
Stiffness Score
Baseline
|
4.9 Scores on a WOMAC stiffness scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
|
Stiffness Score
Week 1
|
3.8 Scores on a WOMAC stiffness scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
|
Stiffness Score
Week 2
|
3.1 Scores on a WOMAC stiffness scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Stiffness Score
Month 1
|
2.5 Scores on a WOMAC stiffness scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
|
Stiffness Score
Month 3
|
1.7 Scores on a WOMAC stiffness scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
|
Stiffness Score
Month 6
|
2.3 Scores on a WOMAC stiffness scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, and at Months 1, 3, and 6.Population: Results of the WOMAC LK 3.1 questionnaire (pain, stiffness, and functionality subscores) were summarized by timepoint.
Changed Outcome Measure Description to: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire using the Likert scale (WOMAC LK), Version 3.1 questionnaire has 24 items that the patient addresses about the knee: 5 items on the pain subscale, 2 on the stiffness subscale, and 17 on the physical function subscale. Each item was to be answered on a 5-point Likert scale, with grading from 0 (none or never) to 4 (extreme or always). The scores are summed for items in each subscale, with possible ranges as follows: pain=0-20, stiffness=0-8, physical function=0-68. A higher score indicates worse pain, stiffness, or functional limitation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)"
n=11 Participants
Patients who have been treated with a single, intra-articular injection.
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)": A therapy prepared at the point-of-care from a small sample of the patient's own blood containing high concentrations of anti-inflammatory and anabolic proteins
|
|---|---|
|
Physical Function Score
Baseline
|
38.1 Scores on a WOMAC functionality scale
Standard Deviation 7.5
|
|
Physical Function Score
Week 1
|
27.8 Scores on a WOMAC functionality scale
Standard Deviation 16.2
|
|
Physical Function Score
Week 2
|
21.9 Scores on a WOMAC functionality scale
Standard Deviation 13.4
|
|
Physical Function Score
Month 1
|
17.5 Scores on a WOMAC functionality scale
Standard Deviation 15.1
|
|
Physical Function Score
Month 3
|
10 Scores on a WOMAC functionality scale
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
|
Physical Function Score
Month 6
|
12.3 Scores on a WOMAC functionality scale
Standard Deviation 14.7
|
Adverse Events
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)"
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)"
n=11 participants at risk
Patients who have been treated with a single, intra-articular injection.
Autologous Protein Solution "APS(TM)": A therapy prepared at the point-of-care from a small sample of the patient's own blood containing high concentrations of anti-inflammatory and anabolic proteins
|
|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint effusion
|
54.5%
6/11 • Number of events 7 • AEs were recorded at each visit (Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6)
In cases where a patient reported multiple occurrences of an AE, the first occurrence of the worst reported case of the event was to be used for the purpose of analysis.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
27.3%
3/11 • Number of events 4 • AEs were recorded at each visit (Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6)
In cases where a patient reported multiple occurrences of an AE, the first occurrence of the worst reported case of the event was to be used for the purpose of analysis.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint stiffness
|
27.3%
3/11 • Number of events 3 • AEs were recorded at each visit (Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6)
In cases where a patient reported multiple occurrences of an AE, the first occurrence of the worst reported case of the event was to be used for the purpose of analysis.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint instability
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2 • AEs were recorded at each visit (Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6)
In cases where a patient reported multiple occurrences of an AE, the first occurrence of the worst reported case of the event was to be used for the purpose of analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • AEs were recorded at each visit (Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6)
In cases where a patient reported multiple occurrences of an AE, the first occurrence of the worst reported case of the event was to be used for the purpose of analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Site Discomfort
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • AEs were recorded at each visit (Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6)
In cases where a patient reported multiple occurrences of an AE, the first occurrence of the worst reported case of the event was to be used for the purpose of analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site joint pain
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • AEs were recorded at each visit (Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6)
In cases where a patient reported multiple occurrences of an AE, the first occurrence of the worst reported case of the event was to be used for the purpose of analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • AEs were recorded at each visit (Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6)
In cases where a patient reported multiple occurrences of an AE, the first occurrence of the worst reported case of the event was to be used for the purpose of analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tootache
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • AEs were recorded at each visit (Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6)
In cases where a patient reported multiple occurrences of an AE, the first occurrence of the worst reported case of the event was to be used for the purpose of analysis.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural Nausea
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • AEs were recorded at each visit (Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6)
In cases where a patient reported multiple occurrences of an AE, the first occurrence of the worst reported case of the event was to be used for the purpose of analysis.
|
Additional Information
Linda Korthout, Scientific Affairs Specialist
Zimmer Biomet
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60