Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Test of Different Kinds of Bandages on Healing of Wounds (NCT NCT01770860)
NCT ID: NCT01770860
Last Updated: 2014-08-04
Results Overview
Wound epithelialization will be recorded daily for each wound (until healed) by the doctor on a scale of 0-5, where 0= No presence of epithelialization (no sign of healing), a bandage is necessary and 5=Wound is 100% epithelialized (healed), no bandage necessary. The median time to healing will be estimated from the survival curves using the Kaplan-Meier method for each test product. Time to healing is defined as the time from wounding to 12:00 pm of the day the wound is 100% epithelialized (receives a score of 5). If the wound is not 100% epithelialized on Day 14 or on the last day of visit, Time to healing will be considered as censored.
COMPLETED
NA
46 participants
within 14 days
2014-08-04
Participant Flow
One additional subject was enrolled but withdrew before randomization.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
4 Commercially-available Bandage and 1 Control
Five dermabrasion wounds will be created on each subject's back by a licensed physician. Four of the wounds will be covered with four different commercially-available bandages (6660, 4314, 8336 and 4840), and one wound will be left open to the air to serve as a no treatment control (0000). Treatments and control will be randomized to application site.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
46
|
|
Overall Study
Randomization
|
45
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
4 Commercially-available Bandage and 1 Control
Five dermabrasion wounds will be created on each subject's back by a licensed physician. Four of the wounds will be covered with four different commercially-available bandages (6660, 4314, 8336 and 4840), and one wound will be left open to the air to serve as a no treatment control (0000). Treatments and control will be randomized to application site.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Administrative decision made by the PI
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Test of Different Kinds of Bandages on Healing of Wounds
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
4 Commercially-available Bandage and 1 Control
n=45 Participants
Five dermabrasion wounds will be created on each subject's back by a licensed physician. Four of the wounds will be covered with four different commercially-available bandages (6660, 4314, 8336 and 4840), and one wound will be left open to the air to serve as a no treatment control (0000). Treatments and control will be randomized to application site.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.47 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
45 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Classification
Fitzpatrick Skin Classification - II
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Classification
Fitzpatrick Skin Classification - III
|
34 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: within 14 daysPopulation: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population is defined as all subjects who received study bandages. Forty six subjects were enrolled but one withdrew before randomization.
Wound epithelialization will be recorded daily for each wound (until healed) by the doctor on a scale of 0-5, where 0= No presence of epithelialization (no sign of healing), a bandage is necessary and 5=Wound is 100% epithelialized (healed), no bandage necessary. The median time to healing will be estimated from the survival curves using the Kaplan-Meier method for each test product. Time to healing is defined as the time from wounding to 12:00 pm of the day the wound is 100% epithelialized (receives a score of 5). If the wound is not 100% epithelialized on Day 14 or on the last day of visit, Time to healing will be considered as censored.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips (With Pad Removed)
n=45 Participants
No treatment
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips
n=45 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Flexible Fabric
n=45 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Tough Strips Waterproof
n=45 Participants
|
Bandage Dora the Explorer™
n=45 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Healing (Days)
|
13.1 days
Interval 12.95 to 13.14
|
NA days
Due to the censoring status of the data, the median time to healing could not be estimated
|
13.1 days
Interval 13.05 to 13.15
|
NA days
Interval 10.9 to
Due to the censoring status of the data, the median time to healing could not be estimated
|
NA days
Due to the censoring status of the data, the median time to healing could not be estimated
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 14 daysPopulation: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population is defined as all subjects who received study bandages. One randomized subject withdrew from the study.
The wound evaluator will rank the overall appearance of all five wounds in relation to each other on a daily basis until all five are healed on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1= Worst and 5=Best. The forced Rank was evaluated at each visit. The mean score derived as total score divided by visit number 13 was analyzed using a mixed model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips (With Pad Removed)
n=44 Participants
No treatment
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Flexible Fabric
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Tough Strips Waterproof
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage Dora the Explorer™
n=44 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Forced Rank Score
|
1.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
3.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90 • Interval 1.24 to 1.88
|
2.44 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95 • Interval 0.65 to 1.28
|
3.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01 • Interval 1.97 to 2.61
|
3.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95 • Interval 1.5 to 2.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 14 daysPopulation: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population is defined as all subjects who received study bandages. One randomized subject withdrew from the study.
Until healed, erythema (redness) of each wound bed and surrounding skin will be scored daily on a scale of 0-10, where 0=None and 10=Most severe. Erythema was evaluated at each visit. The mean score derived as total score divided by visit number 13 was analyzed here using a mixed model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips (With Pad Removed)
n=44 Participants
No treatment
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Flexible Fabric
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Tough Strips Waterproof
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage Dora the Explorer™
n=44 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Erythema
|
1.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
0.90 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42 • Interval -1.02 to -0.67
|
0.90 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49 • Interval -1.01 to -0.66
|
0.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48 • Interval -0.94 to -0.59
|
0.88 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43 • Interval -1.03 to -0.68
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 14 daysPopulation: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population is defined as all subjects who received study bandages. One randomized subject withdrew from the study.
Until healed, edema (swelling) of each wound bed and surrounding skin will be scored daily on a scale of 0-10, where 0=None and 10=Most severe. Mean Edema was evaluated at each visit. The mean score derived as total score divided by visit number 13 was analyzed using a mixed model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips (With Pad Removed)
n=44 Participants
No treatment
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Flexible Fabric
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Tough Strips Waterproof
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage Dora the Explorer™
n=44 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Edema
|
1.44 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
0.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
0.69 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
0.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
|
0.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 14 daysPopulation: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population is defined as all subjects who received study bandages. One randomized subject withdrew from the study.
Until healed, maceration (a slight whitening of the skin around the wound compared to the surrounding unbandaged area) will be scored as P=Present or A=Absent. Percentage of maceration was derived as the maceration presence times over study period divided by visit number 13.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips (With Pad Removed)
n=44 Participants
No treatment
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Flexible Fabric
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Tough Strips Waterproof
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage Dora the Explorer™
n=44 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maceration
|
4.37 percentage of maceration
Standard Deviation 9.15
|
70.98 percentage of maceration
Standard Deviation 22.12
|
65.21 percentage of maceration
Standard Deviation 23.43
|
39.34 percentage of maceration
Standard Deviation 31.88
|
63.99 percentage of maceration
Standard Deviation 26.64
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 14 daysPopulation: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population is defined as all subjects who received study bandages. One randomized subject withdrew from the study.
Until healed, pain assessments by the participant will be recorded daily for each wound site as either Present (P) or Absent (A). Percentage of pain was derived as the pain presence times over study period divided by visit number 13.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips (With Pad Removed)
n=44 Participants
No treatment
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Flexible Fabric
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Tough Strips Waterproof
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage Dora the Explorer™
n=44 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Assessment of Pain
|
5.24 percentage of pain
Standard Deviation 12.39
|
4.55 percentage of pain
Standard Deviation 10.13
|
2.45 percentage of pain
Standard Deviation 6.38
|
3.85 percentage of pain
Standard Deviation 7.87
|
2.45 percentage of pain
Standard Deviation 5.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 14 daysPopulation: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population is defined as all subjects who received study bandages. One randomized subject withdrew from the study.
Until healed, itch assessments by the participant will be recorded daily for each wound site as either Present (P) or Absent (A). Percentage of itch was derived as the itch presence times over study period divided by visit number 13.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips (With Pad Removed)
n=44 Participants
No treatment
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Flexible Fabric
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Tough Strips Waterproof
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage Dora the Explorer™
n=44 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Assessment of Itch
|
21.33 percentage of itching
Standard Deviation 28.24
|
26.22 percentage of itching
Standard Deviation 29.46
|
16.43 percentage of itching
Standard Deviation 21.73
|
25.87 percentage of itching
Standard Deviation 26.24
|
20.10 percentage of itching
Standard Deviation 22.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 14 daysPopulation: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population is defined as all subjects who received study bandages. One randomized subject withdrew from the study.
Until healed, subjects will be shown photographs of each wound they have not previously classified as healed at each daily visit, and asked to determine if the wound is healed. Yes or No responses will be recorded, along with text entries of the reasons for the response. This outcome measure reports the number of subjects who report that the wound has healed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips (With Pad Removed)
n=44 Participants
No treatment
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Sheer Strips
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Flexible Fabric
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage QuiltVent™ Tough Strips Waterproof
n=44 Participants
|
Bandage Dora the Explorer™
n=44 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Assessment of Wound Healing
|
22 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
Adverse Events
4 Commercially-available Bandage and 1 Control
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
4 Commercially-available Bandage and 1 Control
n=46 participants at risk
Five dermabrasion wounds will be created on each subject's back by a licensed physician. Four of the wounds will be covered with four different commercially-available bandages (6660, 4314, 8336 and 4840), and one wound will be left open to the air to serve as a no treatment control (0000). Treatments and control will be randomized to application site.
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
|
2.2%
1/46 • 30 days and beyond for serious adverse events if assessed as possibly treatment related. Visits 2-15 and beyond if needed for adverse events.
The safety population was 46. One subject withdrew from the study, before randomization or receving treatment, due to a serious adverse event. Adverse events were collected for all five interventions simultaneously without attributing causal relationship to a particular intervention.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
4 Commercially-available Bandage and 1 Control
n=46 participants at risk
Five dermabrasion wounds will be created on each subject's back by a licensed physician. Four of the wounds will be covered with four different commercially-available bandages (6660, 4314, 8336 and 4840), and one wound will be left open to the air to serve as a no treatment control (0000). Treatments and control will be randomized to application site.
|
|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
13.0%
6/46 • 30 days and beyond for serious adverse events if assessed as possibly treatment related. Visits 2-15 and beyond if needed for adverse events.
The safety population was 46. One subject withdrew from the study, before randomization or receving treatment, due to a serious adverse event. Adverse events were collected for all five interventions simultaneously without attributing causal relationship to a particular intervention.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Excoriation
|
2.2%
1/46 • 30 days and beyond for serious adverse events if assessed as possibly treatment related. Visits 2-15 and beyond if needed for adverse events.
The safety population was 46. One subject withdrew from the study, before randomization or receving treatment, due to a serious adverse event. Adverse events were collected for all five interventions simultaneously without attributing causal relationship to a particular intervention.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
2.2%
1/46 • 30 days and beyond for serious adverse events if assessed as possibly treatment related. Visits 2-15 and beyond if needed for adverse events.
The safety population was 46. One subject withdrew from the study, before randomization or receving treatment, due to a serious adverse event. Adverse events were collected for all five interventions simultaneously without attributing causal relationship to a particular intervention.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament Sprain
|
2.2%
1/46 • 30 days and beyond for serious adverse events if assessed as possibly treatment related. Visits 2-15 and beyond if needed for adverse events.
The safety population was 46. One subject withdrew from the study, before randomization or receving treatment, due to a serious adverse event. Adverse events were collected for all five interventions simultaneously without attributing causal relationship to a particular intervention.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
2.2%
1/46 • 30 days and beyond for serious adverse events if assessed as possibly treatment related. Visits 2-15 and beyond if needed for adverse events.
The safety population was 46. One subject withdrew from the study, before randomization or receving treatment, due to a serious adverse event. Adverse events were collected for all five interventions simultaneously without attributing causal relationship to a particular intervention.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory Tract Congestion
|
2.2%
1/46 • 30 days and beyond for serious adverse events if assessed as possibly treatment related. Visits 2-15 and beyond if needed for adverse events.
The safety population was 46. One subject withdrew from the study, before randomization or receving treatment, due to a serious adverse event. Adverse events were collected for all five interventions simultaneously without attributing causal relationship to a particular intervention.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper Respiratory Tract Congestion
|
2.2%
1/46 • 30 days and beyond for serious adverse events if assessed as possibly treatment related. Visits 2-15 and beyond if needed for adverse events.
The safety population was 46. One subject withdrew from the study, before randomization or receving treatment, due to a serious adverse event. Adverse events were collected for all five interventions simultaneously without attributing causal relationship to a particular intervention.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth Abscess
|
2.2%
1/46 • 30 days and beyond for serious adverse events if assessed as possibly treatment related. Visits 2-15 and beyond if needed for adverse events.
The safety population was 46. One subject withdrew from the study, before randomization or receving treatment, due to a serious adverse event. Adverse events were collected for all five interventions simultaneously without attributing causal relationship to a particular intervention.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza Like Illness
|
2.2%
1/46 • 30 days and beyond for serious adverse events if assessed as possibly treatment related. Visits 2-15 and beyond if needed for adverse events.
The safety population was 46. One subject withdrew from the study, before randomization or receving treatment, due to a serious adverse event. Adverse events were collected for all five interventions simultaneously without attributing causal relationship to a particular intervention.
|
Additional Information
Associate Director, Clinical Research
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products Company Division of Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60