Evaluation of the Efficacy of Rasagiline in Apathy in Drug-naïve Patients With Parkinson's Disease by a Multi-center Study
NCT ID: NCT01765257
Last Updated: 2013-01-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-06-30
2015-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Rasagiline increases the bioavailability of striatal endogenous dopamine by blocking the MAO-B. Some recent data suggest rasagiline could be effective to improve apathy in Parkinson's disease.
The primary outcome is to demonstrate a significant reduction of apathy using the Lille apathy rating scale (LARS) in drug naive patients with early diagnosed Parkinson's disease, using a treatment by rasagiline.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rasagiline and Apathy in Parkinson's Disease
NCT00755027
Emotion, Mood and Executive Function in Parkinson's Disease (PD)
NCT01385735
Azilect® (Rasagiline) in Levodopa-treated Parkinson's Patients With Motor Fluctuations in China
NCT01479530
The Effects of Rasagiline on Cognitive Deficits Associated With Parkinson's Disease
NCT00696215
Study of Azilect® (Rasagiline) in Levodopa-treated Parkinson's Disease Patients With Motor Fluctuations in Korea
NCT01268891
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Randomized, double-blind, rasagiline (1 mg) vs placebo study. Parallel group (randomization 1/1). Duration 3 months 16 recruiting centers in France
Population :
50 drug-naïve patients with Parkinson's disease, with apathy. 2 groups : 25 patients with placebo and 25 patients with rasagiline.
3 visits
* Visit 1 : inclusion / randomisation/ first study medication dispensation
* Visit 2 (1.5 month after V1) : first evaluation and second study medication dispensation.
* Visit 3 (3 months after V1, final visit) : second evaluation
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
rasagiline
Randomized, double-blind, rasagiline (1 mg) vs placebo study. Parallel group (randomization 1/1). Duration 3 months 16 recruiting centers in France
AZILECT®
placebo
Randomized, double-blind, rasagiline (1 mg) vs placebo study. Parallel group (randomization 1/1). Duration 3 months 16 recruiting centers in France
Placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AZILECT®
Placebo
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No dementia (Mattis dementia rating scale \> 130; Mini Mental Sate Examination ≥26)
* No depression (MADRS \< 15)
* Criteria of apathy from Robert et al (2009)
* At least mild apathy (≥-21 to Lille Apathy Rating Scale)
* Age : 35-70 y
* Affiliation to social security
* Agreement of patients
Exclusion Criteria
* Ongoing severe psychiatric or somatic diseases
* Others treatments :
* antipsychotics
* antidepressants and anxiolytics (exclusion if the treatment is not stable the month before inclusion)
* psychostimulants (methylphenidate, adrafinil, modafinil, deanol, vitamin C, sulbutiamine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid)
* any contra-indication according to SmPC
* patients under guardianship
* Women without efficient contraception
* Person who participate to an other study
30 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
H. Lundbeck A/S
INDUSTRY
CHU Purpan (Toulouse)
UNKNOWN
Hôpital Haut-Lévêque
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier de la côte Basque
OTHER
Poitiers University Hospital
OTHER
CHU de Rennes (Rennes)
UNKNOWN
University Hospital, Lille
OTHER
Hôpital Dupuytren
OTHER
University Hospital, Caen
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix
OTHER
Hôpital de la Timone (MARSEILLE)
UNKNOWN
University Hospital, Rouen
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
OTHER
Fondation Rothschild Paris
OTHER
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Denis PEZET
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2007-002800-16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CHU-0138
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.