Post-approval Study of NovoTTF-100A in Recurrent GBM Patients

NCT ID: NCT01756729

Last Updated: 2016-03-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-12-31

Study Completion Date

2018-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a non-randomized, concurrent control study, designed to confirm that the efficacy of the NovoTTF-100A System in patients with recurrent GBM treated in a real life settings following approval is comparable to that of BSC chemotherapy patients. The device is a portable, battery operated device that was approved for the treatment of adult patients (22 years of age or older) with histologically-confirmed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), following histologically- or radiologically-confirmed recurrence in the supra-tentorial region of the brain after receiving chemotherapy. The device is intended to be used as a monotherapy, and is intended as an alternative to standard medical therapy for GBM after surgical and radiation options have been exhausted.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PAST CLINICAL EXPERIENCE:

The effect of the electric fields generated by the NovoTTF-100A device (TTFields, TTF) has been tested in a large prospective, randomized trial, in 237 recurrent GBM patients. The outcome of subjects treated with the NovoTTF-100A device was compared to those treated with an effective best standard of care chemotherapy (including bevacizumab). NovoTTF-100A subjects had comparable overall survival to subjects receiving the best available chemotherapy in the US today. Similar results showing comparability of NovoTTF-100A to BSC chemotherapy were seen in all secondary endpoints.

Recurrent GBM patients treated with the NovoTTF-100A device in this trial experienced fewer side effects in general, significantly fewer treatment related side effects, and significantly lower gastrointestinal, hematological and infectious adverse events compared to controls. The only device-related adverse events seen were a mild to moderate skin irritation beneath the device electrodes. Finally, quality of life measures were better in NovoTTF-100A subjects as a group when compared to subjects receiving effective best standard of care chemotherapy.

DESCRIPTION OF THE TRIAL:

Patients with GBM whose disease has first recurred despite standard treatment (Surgery, radiation therapy, Temozolomide treatment) and meet all of the requirements for participation in the study will be recruited to one of two groups based on patient preference alone:

1. Treatment with the NovoTTF-100A device, or
2. Treatment with the best standard of care practiced at each of the participating centers.

If recruited to the best standard of care group, patients will receive a chemotherapeutic agent chosen based on their prior treatments and the standard of care practiced at each treating center.

If recruited to the NovoTTF-100A group, the patients will be treated continuously until tumor progression. NovoTTF-100A treatment will consist of wearing four electrically insulated electrodes on the head. Electrode placement will require shaving of the scalp before treatment. Patients will continue treatment at home where they can maintain their regular daily routine.

During the trial, regardless of whether assigned to the NovoTTF-100A treatment group or the best standard of care group, patients will need to return once every month the hospital outpatient clinics where they will be examined by a physician. These routine visits will continue for as long as the patient's disease is not progressing.

During the visits to the clinic patients will be examined physically and neurologically, as well as fill in neuro-cognitive questionnaires. Adverse events data will be collected from all patients.. After this follow up plan, patients will be contacted once per month by telephone to answer basic questions about their health status.

SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND:

TTFields are alternating electric fields of low intensity. This means that they change their direction repetitively many times a second. Since they change direction very rapidly (200 thousand times a second), they do not cause muscles to twitch, nor do they have any effects on other electrically activated tissues in the body (brain, nerves and heart). Since the intensities of TTFields in the body are very low, they do not cause heating.

The breakthrough finding made by NovoCure was that finely tuned alternating fields of very low intensity, now termed TTFields (Tumor Treating Fields), cause a significant slowing in the growth of cancer cells. Due to the unique geometric shape of cancer cells when they are multiplying, TTFields cause the building blocks of these cells to move and pile up in such a way that the cells physically explode. In addition, cancer cells also contain miniature building blocks which act as tiny motors in moving essential parts of the cells from place to place. TTFields cause these tiny motors to fall apart since they have a special type of electric charge.

As a result of these two effects, cancer tumor growth is slowed and can even reverse after continuous exposure to TTFields.

Other cells in the body (normal healthy tissues) are affected much less than cancer cells since they multiply at a much slower rate if at all. In addition TTFields can be directed to a certain part of the body, leaving sensitive areas out of their reach.

In conclusion, TTField hold the promise of serving as a brand new cancer treatment with very few side effects and promising affectivity in slowing or reversing this disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NovoTTF-100A (monotherapy)

Patients will be treated continuously with the NovoTTF-100A device. NovoTTF-100A treatment will consist of wearing four electrically insulated electrode arrays on the head. The treatment enables the patient to maintain regular daily routine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NovoTTF-100A

Intervention Type DEVICE

Multiple four-week courses of continuous NovoTTF-100A treatment.

Best Standard of Care

Patients recruited to the BSC group will be treated according to the BSC practiced at each center.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

NovoTTF-100A

Intervention Type DEVICE

Multiple four-week courses of continuous NovoTTF-100A treatment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NovoTTF-100A

Multiple four-week courses of continuous NovoTTF-100A treatment.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 22 years of age or older
2. Histological diagnosis of GBM (WHO grade IV)
3. Tumor located in the supra-tentorial region of the brain
4. Received maximal, safe, surgical resection
5. Received maximal radiation therapy
6. Received concomitant Temozolomide
7. Received maintenance Temozolomide
8. First recurrence (based on radiological or histological evidence of recurrence)
9. Karnofsky performance score 70 or above
10. MMSE score 25 or above
11. Adequate amount and quality of tumor tissue from first surgical resection available for genetic profiling
12. Women of childbearing age must be on effective contraception
13. Signed informed consent
14. Stable steroid dose in past 4 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

1. Implanted electronic medical device in the brain:

1. Deep brain stimulator
2. Vagus nerve stimulator
3. Programmable shunt
2. Skull defect without replacement
3. Unable to comply with treatment with the NovoTTF-100A device
4. Pregnant
5. Prior antiangiogenic therapy (e.g., Bevacizumab/Avastin)
6. Second or subsequent recurrence
7. Any prior cytotoxic chemotherapy except Temozolomide
8. Actively participating in another therapeutic clinical trial
9. Radiological suspicion of pseudoprogression or radionecrosis
10. Radiation therapy or surgery in the past 4 weeks
11. Unable to comply with the study follow-up schedule
12. Any serious co-morbidity which is expected to affect survival more adversely than GBM
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NovoCure Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Herbert Engelhard, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Illinois at Chicago

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Barrow Neurology Clinics

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Keck Medical Center of USC

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Kentucky, Markey Cancer Center

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Oncology

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

The Long Island Brain Tumor Center

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

Geisinger Health System

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Baylor Research Institute

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R, Dekel E, Itzhaki A, Wasserman Y, Schatzberger R, Palti Y. Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. Cancer Res. 2004 May 1;64(9):3288-95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0083.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15126372 (View on PubMed)

Kirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F, Vymazal J, Soustiel JF, Itzhaki A, Mordechovich D, Steinberg-Shapira S, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R, Wasserman Y, Salzberg M, Ryffel B, Goldsher D, Dekel E, Palti Y. Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):10152-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702916104. Epub 2007 Jun 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17551011 (View on PubMed)

Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA, Steinberg D, Engelhard H, Heidecke V, Kirson ED, Taillibert S, Liebermann F, Dbaly V, Ram Z, Villano JL, Rainov N, Weinberg U, Schiff D, Kunschner L, Raizer J, Honnorat J, Sloan A, Malkin M, Landolfi JC, Payer F, Mehdorn M, Weil RJ, Pannullo SC, Westphal M, Smrcka M, Chin L, Kostron H, Hofer S, Bruce J, Cosgrove R, Paleologous N, Palti Y, Gutin PH. NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Sep;48(14):2192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 May 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22608262 (View on PubMed)

Zhu JJ, Goldlust SA, Kleinberg LR, Honnorat J, Oberheim Bush NA, Ram Z. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy vs physicians' choice standard-of-care treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a post-approval registry study (EF-19). Discov Oncol. 2022 Oct 14;13(1):105. doi: 10.1007/s12672-022-00555-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36239858 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EF-19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.