Study Comparing Ticagrelor With Aspirin for Prevention of Vascular Events in Patients Undergoing CABG

NCT ID: NCT01755520

Last Updated: 2018-08-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1893 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-24

Study Completion Date

2018-05-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study ist to test the hypothesis that ticagrelor is superior to Aspirin (ASA) fort he prevention of major cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients undergoing artery bypass operation.

The primary efficiacy MACCE-endpoint is the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, recurent revascularisation, and stroke at twelve month after coronary artery bypass operation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For stable patients who underwent coronary bypass operation, Aspirin alone currently represents the gold standard of antiplatelet treatment.

The CABG substudy of the PLATO-trial (http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0904327) comprising more than 1200 patients has convincingly shown a high significant reduction of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality for patients recieving Aspirin and Ticagrelor as compared to those subjects randomized to Aspirin plus Clopidogrel. Moreover the results of the PLATO CABG substudy showed that benefits of Ticagrelor increase with decreasing Aspirin doses. Therefore Ticagrelor monotherapy (2x 90mg/day) appears to offer the best balance of safety with anticipated improved efficacy over Aspirin (1x 100mg/day) alone, but until now there are no further data available to support this hypothesis.

Hence this study (TiCAB) is assigned as a pivotal efficacy and safety study of Ticagrelor in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass operation and to test the hypothesis that ticagrelor is superior to Aspirin for the prevention of major cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in this patient population.

The TiCAB trial is designed as a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, phase III, multicenter study, comparing the efficacy and safety of Ticagrelor 90mg administered twice daily with Aspirin 100mg once daily, for the prevention of MACCE within the first year after CABG operation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease Stable Angina Acute Coronary Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ticagrelor

Intervention: Drug: Ticagrelor verum + Aspirin placebo

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ticagrelor

Intervention Type DRUG

90mg twice daily dose

Placebo - Aspirin

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Aspirin

Intervention: Drug: Aspirin verum + Ticagrelor placebo

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Aspirin

Intervention Type DRUG

Aspirin 100mg once daily

Placebo - Ticagrelor

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ticagrelor

90mg twice daily dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Aspirin

Aspirin 100mg once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo - Ticagrelor

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo - Aspirin

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Brilique ASS Placebo Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients 18 years of age or older
2. Informed, written consent by the patient
3. Indication for CABG surgery:

* coronary three vessel disease, or
* left main stenosis, or
* two vessel disease with impaired left ventricular function (\<50%)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Cardiogenic shock, haemodynamic instability
2. Indication for oral anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy that can not be stopped after CABG
3. Need for concomitant non-coronary surgery (e.g. valve replacement)
4. Intolerance of or Allergy to Ticagrelor or ASA or any of their ingredients
5. History of bleeding diathesis within three months prior presentation
6. History of significant gastrointestinal bleeding within six months prior presentation
7. History of intracranial hemorrhage
8. History of moderate to severe liver impairment (Child Pugh B or C)
9. Chronic renal insufficiency requiring dialysis
10. Patient with an increased risk of bradycardic events (e.g. patients without a pacemaker who have sick sinus syndrome, 2nd or 3rd degree AV block or bradycardic-related syncope)
11. Known, clinically important thrombocytopenia (i.e. \<100.000/µl)
12. Known, clinically important anaemia (i.e. \<10mg/dl)
13. Participation in another investigational drug or device study in the last 30 days
14. Pregnancy or lactation (for premenopausal women 2 methods of reliable contraception, one of which must be barrier method, are required); in women with childbearing potential a pregnancy test is mandatory
15. Concomitant oral or intravenous therapy (see examples below) with strong CYP3A inhibitors, CYP3A substrates with narrow therapeutic indices, or strong CYP3A inducers which cannot be stopped for the course of the study

* Strong inhibitors: ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, telithromycin, clarithromycin, nefazadone, ritonavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, atazanavir, over 1 litre daily of grapefruit juice.
* Substrates with narrow therapeutic index: cyclosporine, quinidine.
* Strong inducers: rifampin/rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine.
16. Life expectancy less than 12 months that may result in protocol non-compliance or a risk for being lost to follow-up, active cancer
17. Indication for major surgery (e.g. cancer treatment, carotid surgery, cerebral surgery, major vascular surgery)
18. Previous enrollment or randomization of treatment in the present study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Heribert Schunkert, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich Germany

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medizinische Universität Wien

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen

Wels, , Austria

Site Status

Deutsches Herzzentrum München

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Herzzentrum Brandenburg in Bernau

Bernau bei Berlin, Brandenburg, Germany

Site Status

Herz- und Kreislaufzentrum Rothenburg an der Fulda

Rotenburg an der Fulda, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Jena

Jena, Thuringia, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Aachen

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Herz- und Gefäßzentrum

Bad Bevensen, , Germany

Site Status

Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH

Bad Nauheim, , Germany

Site Status

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Gesundheit Nord gGmbH, Klinikum Links der Weser gGmbH

Bremen, , Germany

Site Status

Sana Herzzentrum Cottbus GmbH

Cottbus, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

St. Antonius Hospital

Eschweiler, , Germany

Site Status

Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg / Bad Krozingen

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Gießen

Giessen, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsmedizin Göttingen

Göttingen, , Germany

Site Status

Asklepios Klinik St.Georg

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Universitäres Herzzentrum Hamburg GmbH

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Ludwigshafen

Ludwigshafen, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH

Mönchengladbach, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Nürnberg Süd

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier

Trier, , Germany

Site Status

Schweizer Herz- und Gefässchirurgie

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Germany Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sandner SE, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Wiedemann D, Misfeld M, Boning A, Tebbe U, Nowak B, Stritzke J, Laufer G, von Scheidt M; TiCAB Investigators. Ticagrelor monotherapy versus aspirin in patients undergoing multiple arterial or single arterial coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the TiCAB trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Apr 1;57(4):732-739. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz313.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31750899 (View on PubMed)

Schunkert H, Boening A, von Scheidt M, Lanig C, Gusmini F, de Waha A, Kuna C, Fach A, Grothusen C, Oberhoffer M, Knosalla C, Walther T, Danner BC, Misfeld M, Zeymer U, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Siepe M, Grubitzsch H, Joost A, Schaefer A, Conradi L, Cremer J, Hamm C, Lange R, Radke PW, Schulz R, Laufer G, Grieshaber P, Pader P, Attmann T, Schmoeckel M, Meyer A, Ziegelhoffer T, Hambrecht R, Kastrati A, Sandner SE. Randomized trial of ticagrelor vs. aspirin in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting: the TiCAB trial. Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 1;40(29):2432-2440. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz185.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31145798 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-003630-16

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

GE IDE No. D00112

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Triple vs. Dual Therapy
NCT02080858 COMPLETED PHASE1
Antithrombotic Triple Therapy in Humans
NCT01812200 COMPLETED PHASE4
Ticagrelor and Peripheral Arterial Disease
NCT02407314 TERMINATED PHASE4
Canadian Ticagrelor Survey
NCT01757483 COMPLETED