The Role of Xerostomia in Burning Mouth Syndrome: Case - Control Study

NCT ID: NCT01754740

Last Updated: 2012-12-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objectives: to evaluate xerostomia and salivary flow in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) treated with amitriptyline before and after the use of antixerostomic topical medication.

Methods: In this case-control double-blinded study, we enrolled 38 patients with BMS diagnosed according to the (IASP). The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Study Group: 19 patients whom received topical medication of urea 10% and Control Group: 19 patients whom received placebo to apply at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months. The patients were evaluated before and after the above treatment. Finally, data were statistically analyzed.

It is know that BMS is eventually associated to reduced salivary flow (Cho et al.,2010; Kho et al., 2010; Marino et al., 2010) and to abnormal salivary composition (increasing concentrations of K+, Na+, Cl-, Ca+2, IgA, amylase) (Patton et al., 2007). Even in the absence of hyposalivation, patients may complain of xerostomia and dry mouth (Cho et al.,2010; Kho et al., 2010; Marino et al., 2010; Thomson, 2005). These patients also have several sensory losses even in taste and smell function, recently described (Siqueira et al., 2006a; Siqueira et al., 2006b; Siviero et al., 2011).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Materials and Methods In this case-control double-blinded study, we enrolled 38 patients with BMS diagnosed according to the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) (17), that had been followed at the Craniofacial Pain Clinic of Hospital das Clinicas, School of Medicine of the University of Sao Paulo. All subjects were informed about the purposes of the study, and all signed the informed consent. The protocol had been approved by the local Ethics Committee. No patient had hyposalivation at the moment of diagnosis by the quantitative evaluation. All patients had been treated with 25mg-50mg of amitriptyline within the last three months. They underwent laboratory tests and careful exam to exclude other causes of burning mouth (10).

The exclusion criteria were other facial pain syndromes, other causes for abnormal salivation, other neuropathies or primary diseases associated to burning mouth, inability to answer the questions and / or tests

The subjects were randomly divided into two groups:

1. Study Group: 19 patients received topical medication of urea 10% to be applied at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months.
2. Control Group: 19 patients received placebo (5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.15% methyl paraben and 10% glycerol in distilled water qsp 100g) to be applied at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months.

The patients were evaluated before and after the above treatment with the following instruments:

1. EDOF-HC protocol (Orofacial Pain Clinic - Hospital das Clinicas): a standardized orofacial pain questionnaire to detail: 1) chief complaint, 2) general pain characteristics (location, quality, duration, pain relief, pain triggering), 3) headache and/or body pain complaints, and 4) patient's medical history and co-morbidities (18,19);
2. Xerostomia questionnaire (20);
3. Quantitative sensory testing. All subjects underwent a standardized protocol of quantitative sensory testing (QST) (21) which consists of twelve tests grouped as follows:

* salivary flow; gustative and olfactory thresholds;
* thermal detection thresholds for cold and warm sensations;
* mechanical detection thresholds for touch, vibration and electrical perception;
* mechanical pain sensitivity including superficial and deep pain thresholds;
* electric pain threshold at the teeth.
* corneal reflex.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Burning Mouth Syndrome

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Xerostomia, Salivary flow, Burning Mouth Syndrome.

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study Group

19 patients whom received topical medication of urea 10%

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Uréia

Intervention Type DRUG

The subjects were randomly divided into two groups:

1\. Study Group: 19 patients received topical medication of urea 10% to be applied at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months.

Control Group

19 patients whom received placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Control Group: 19 patients received placebo (5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.15% methyl paraben and 10% glycerol in distilled water qsp 100g) to be applied at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Uréia

The subjects were randomly divided into two groups:

1\. Study Group: 19 patients received topical medication of urea 10% to be applied at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Control Group: 19 patients received placebo (5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.15% methyl paraben and 10% glycerol in distilled water qsp 100g) to be applied at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ureia 10%

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients had been treated with 25mg-50mg of amitriptyline within the last three months. They underwent laboratory tests and careful exam to exclude other causes of burning mouth

Exclusion Criteria

* other facial pain syndromes, other causes for abnormal salivation, other neuropathies or primary diseases associated to burning mouth, inability to answer the questions and / or tests
Minimum Eligible Age

37 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

88 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Silvia RDT Siqueira, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Sao Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital das Clinicas, Medical Scholl, University of Sao Paulo

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12345

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id