Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2008 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-12-31
2020-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The ABSORB III includes additional two trials i.e. ABSORB III PK (pharmacokinetics) sub-study and ABSORB IV RCT trial which are maintained under one protocol because both trial designs are related, ABSORB IV is the continuation of ABSORB III and the data from ABSORB III and ABSORB IV will be pooled to support the ABSORB IV primary endpoint. Both the trials will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Absorb BVS.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Absorb IV Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02173379
Pharmacokinetics of Everolimus in Absorb BVS in Patients With Coronary Artery Lesions
NCT02229864
ABSORB II Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT01425281
A Clinical Evaluation of Absorb™ Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (Absorb™ BVS) System in Chinese Population ~ ABSORB CHINA Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
NCT01923740
ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort A (ABSORB A) Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System Clinical Investigation
NCT00300131
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A. Primary Objective: The pivotal trial to support the US pre-market approval (PMA) of Absorb BVS. ABSORB III will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Absorb BVS System compared to the XIENCE in the treatment of subjects, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease caused by up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in separate epicardial vessels.
B. Powered Secondary Objectives:
1. Lead-In Phase Objective: To evaluate the applicability and transferability of the didactic Absorb BVS physician training plan to US clinical practice.
The lead-in phase is a non-randomized, single-arm, open label group of up to 50 subjects treated with Absorb BVS at up to 35 US sites. The Lead-In phase will enroll/register subjects prior to the randomization phase of ABSORB III.
The Lead-In Phase allows the treatment of up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in different epicardial vessels with reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 2.75 mm to ≤ 3.25 mm and lesion lengths ≥ 8 to ≤ 14 mm.
2. Imaging Cohort Objective: To evaluate long-term vascular function and patency of the Absorb BVS treated segments compared to XIENCE treated segments in the treatment of subjects with ischemic heart disease caused by up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in separate epicardial vessels.
The imaging cohort-phase is a prospective, randomized (2:1 Absorb BVS to XIENCE), single-blind, multi-center trial, registering approximately 200 subjects. This includes 150 subjects for the angiographic/intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) endpoints analysis and approximately 50 subjects for optical coherence tomography (OCT) endpoints analysis. The 200 subjects are separate from the 2000 subjects included in the primary analysis. Data from two powered secondary endpoints from this cohort will support label claims of superiority of Absorb BVS as compared to XIENCE specific to vasomotion and late lumen enlargement.
All other subjects in ABSORB III unless specified will receive treatment of up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in different epicardial vessels with RVD ≥ 2.5 mm to ≤ 3.75 mm and lesion lengths ≤ 24 mm.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Absorb BVS
Subjects receiving Absorb BVS
Absorb BVS
* Scaffold diameters: 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 mm
* Scaffold lengths: 8, 12, 18, and 28 mm The 3.0 x 18 mm Absorb BVS will be used for the Lead-In. Both the 8 mm and 12 mm lengths will be available for the 2.5/3.0 mm diameter Absorb BVS. Only the 12 mm length will be available for the 3.5 mm diameter.
* The commercially approved CE marked device will be used in geographies where it is commercially available. The commercially approved CE marked 23mm Absorb BVS device will not be used in this study.
Bioabsorbable drug eluting stent implantation for improving coronary luminal diameter in patients, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease due to de novo native coronary artery lesions (length ≤ 24 mm) with a reference vessel diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.75 mm.
XIENCE
Subjects receiving XIENCE V, XIENCE PRIME, or XIENCE Xpedition
XIENCE
Commercially approved XIENCE Family Stent System, inclusive of XIENCE V, XIENCE PRIME, XIENCE Xpedition, XIENCE Alpine, XIENCE Pro (OUS only), and XIENCE ProX (OUS only).
* Stent diameters: 2.5, 2.75, 3.0, 3.25, 3.5 and 4.0 mm
* Stent lengths: 8, 12, 15, 18, 23, and 28 mm. The 3.25 mm is only available for XIENCE Xpedition
* For geographies where these devices are commercially available, the investigational sties may use only their locally approved devices
To improve coronary luminal diameter in patients, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease due to de novo native coronary artery lesions (length ≤ 24 mm) with a reference vessel diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.75 mm.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Absorb BVS
* Scaffold diameters: 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 mm
* Scaffold lengths: 8, 12, 18, and 28 mm The 3.0 x 18 mm Absorb BVS will be used for the Lead-In. Both the 8 mm and 12 mm lengths will be available for the 2.5/3.0 mm diameter Absorb BVS. Only the 12 mm length will be available for the 3.5 mm diameter.
* The commercially approved CE marked device will be used in geographies where it is commercially available. The commercially approved CE marked 23mm Absorb BVS device will not be used in this study.
Bioabsorbable drug eluting stent implantation for improving coronary luminal diameter in patients, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease due to de novo native coronary artery lesions (length ≤ 24 mm) with a reference vessel diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.75 mm.
XIENCE
Commercially approved XIENCE Family Stent System, inclusive of XIENCE V, XIENCE PRIME, XIENCE Xpedition, XIENCE Alpine, XIENCE Pro (OUS only), and XIENCE ProX (OUS only).
* Stent diameters: 2.5, 2.75, 3.0, 3.25, 3.5 and 4.0 mm
* Stent lengths: 8, 12, 15, 18, 23, and 28 mm. The 3.25 mm is only available for XIENCE Xpedition
* For geographies where these devices are commercially available, the investigational sties may use only their locally approved devices
To improve coronary luminal diameter in patients, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease due to de novo native coronary artery lesions (length ≤ 24 mm) with a reference vessel diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.75 mm.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject or a legally authorized representative must provide written Informed Consent prior to any study related procedure, per site requirements.
3. Subject must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable, unstable angina, post-infarct angina or silent ischemia) suitable for elective PCI. Subjects with stable angina or silent ischemia and \< 70% diameter stenosis must have objectives sign of ischemia as determined by one of the following, echocardiogram, nuclear scan, ambulatory ECG or stress ECG). In the absence of noninvasive ischemia, fractional flow reserve (FFR) must be done and indicative of ischemia.
4. Subject must be an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
5. Female subject of childbearing potential who does not plan pregnancy for up to 1 year following the index procedure. For a female subject of childbearing potential a pregnancy test must be performed with negative results known within 7 days prior to the index procedure per site standard.
6. Female subject is not breast-feeding at the time of the screening visit and will not be breast-feeding for up to 1 year following the index procedure.
7. Subject agrees to not participate in any other investigational or invasive clinical study for a period of 1 year following the index procedure.
1. One or two de novo target lesions:
1. If there is one target lesion, a second non-target lesion may be treated but the non-target lesion must be present in a different epicardial vessel, and must be treated first with a successful, uncomplicated result prior to randomization of the target lesion.
2. If two target lesions are present, they must be present in different epicardial vessels and both must satisfy the angiographic eligibility criteria.
3. The definition of epicardial vessels means the LAD, LCX and RCA and their branches. Thus, the patient must not have lesions requiring treatment in e.g. both the LAD and a diagonal branch.
2. Target lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with a visually estimated or quantitatively assessed %DS of ≥ 50% and \< 100% with a TIMI flow of ≥ 1 and one of the following: stenosis ≥ 70%, an abnormal functional test (e.g., fractional flow reserve, stress test), unstable angina or post-infarct angina.
1. Lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with RVD by visual estimation of ≥ 2.50 mm and ≤ 3.75 mm.
2. Lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with length by visual estimation of ≤ 24 mm.
3. For Lead-In subjects with 3.0x18 mm Absorb BVS: lesions (s) must be located in a native coronary artery with RVD by visual estimation of ≥ 2.75 mm and ≤ 3.25 mm. The lesion length by visual estimation is ≥ 8 mm and ≤ 14 mm.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subject has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to device material and its degradants (everolimus, poly (L-lactide), poly (DL-lactide), lactide, lactic acid) and cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic and fluoro polymers that cannot be adequately pre-medicated. Subject has a known contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
3. Subject has known allergic reaction, hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin; or to clopidogrel and prasugrel and ticagrelor; or to heparin and bivalirudin, and therefore cannot be adequately treated with study medications.
4. Subject had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI; STEMI or NSTEMI) within 72 hours of the index procedure and both CK and CK-MB have not returned to within normal limits at the time of index procedure; or subject with stable angina or silent ischemia has CK-MB that is greater than normal limits at the time of the index procedure.
5. Subject is currently experiencing clinical symptoms consistent with new onset AMI (STEMI or NSTEMI), such as nitrate-unresponsive prolonged chest pain with ischemic ECG changes.
6. Subject has a cardiac arrhythmia as identified at the time of screening for which at least one of the following criteria is met:
1. Subject requires coumadin or any other agent for chronic oral anticoagulation.
2. Subject is likely to become hemodynamically unstable due to their arrhythmia.
3. Subject has poor survival prognosis due to their arrhythmia.
7. Subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 30% assessed by any quantitative method, including but not limited to echocardiography, MRI, Multiple-Gated Acquisition (MUGA) scan, contrast left ventriculography, PET scan, etc. LVEF may be obtained within 6 months prior to the procedure for subjects with stable CAD. For subjects presenting with ACS, LVEF must be assessed during the index hospitalization (which may include during the index procedure by contrast left ventriculography) but prior to randomization in order to confirm the subject's eligibility.
8. Subject has undergone prior PCI within the target vessel during the last 12 months. Prior PCI within the non-target vessel or any peripheral intervention is acceptable if performed anytime \>30 days before the index procedure, or between 24 hours and 30 days before the index procedure if successful and uncomplicated.
9. Subject requires future staged PCI either in target or non-target vessels or subject requires future peripheral interventions \< 30 days after the index procedure
10. Subject has received any solid organ transplants or is on a waiting list for any solid organ transplants.
11. At the time of screening, the subject has a malignancy that is not in remission.
12. Subject is receiving immunosuppressant therapy or has known immunosuppressive or severe autoimmune disease that requires chronic immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.). Note: corticosteroids are not included as immunosuppressant therapy.
13. Subject has previously received or is scheduled to receive radiotherapy to a coronary artery (vascular brachytherapy), or the chest/mediastinum.
14. Subject is receiving or will require chronic anticoagulation therapy (e.g., coumadin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban or any other agent for any reason).
15. Subject has a platelet count \< 100,000 cells/mm3 or \> 700,000 cells/mm3.
16. Subject has a documented or suspected hepatic disorder as defined as cirrhosis or Child-Pugh ≥ Class B.
17. Subject has renal insufficiency as defined as an estimated GFR \< 30 ml/min/1.73m2 or dialysis at the time of screening.
18. Subject is high risk of bleeding for any reason; has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy; has had a significant gastro-intestinal or significant urinary bleed within the past six months.
19. Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic neurological attack (TIA) within the past six months, or any prior intracranial bleed, or any permanent neurologic defect, or any known intracranial pathology (e.g. aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, etc.).
20. Subject has extensive peripheral vascular disease that precludes safe 6 French sheath insertion. Note: femoral arterial disease does not exclude the patient if radial access may be used.
21. Subject has life expectancy \< 5 years for any non-cardiac cause or cardiac cause.
22. Subject is in the opinion of the Investigator or designee, unable to comply with the requirements of the study protocol or is unsuitable for the study for any reason. This includes completion of Patient Reported Outcome instruments.
23. Subject is currently participating in another clinical trial that has not yet completed its primary endpoint.
24. Subject is part of a vulnerable population who, in the judgment of the investigator, is unable to give Informed Consent for reasons of incapacity, immaturity, adverse personal circumstances or lack of autonomy. This may include: Individuals with mental disability, persons in nursing homes, children, impoverished persons, persons in emergency situations, homeless persons, nomads, refugees, and those incapable of giving informed consent. Vulnerable populations also may include members of a group with a hierarchical structure such as university students, subordinate hospital and laboratory personnel, employees of the Sponsor, members of the armed forces, and persons kept in detention.
1. Lesion which prevents successful balloon pre-dilatation, defined as full balloon expansion with the following outcomes:
1. Residual %DS is a maximum \< 40% (per visual estimation), ≤ 20% is strongly recommended.
2. TIMI Grade-3 flow (per visual estimation).
3. No angiographic complications (e.g. distal embolization, side branch closure).
4. No dissections NHLBI grade D-F.
5. No chest pain lasting \> 5 minutes.
6. No ST depression or elevation lasting \> 5 minutes.
2. Lesion is located in left main.
3. Aorto-ostial RCA lesion (within 3 mm of the ostium).
4. Lesion located within 3 mm of the origin of the LAD or LCX.
5. Lesion involving a bifurcation with a:
1. side branch ≥ 2 mm in diameter, or
2. side branch with either an ostial or non-ostial lesion with diameter stenosis \> 50%, or
3. side branch requiring dilatation
6. Anatomy proximal to or within the lesion that may impair delivery of the Absorb BVS or XIENCE stent:
1. Extreme angulation (≥ 90°) proximal to or within the target lesion.
2. Excessive tortuosity (≥ two 45° angles) proximal to or within the target lesion.
3. Moderate or heavy calcification proximal to or within the target lesion. If IVUS used, subject must be excluded if calcium arc in the vessel prior to the lesion or within the lesion is ≥ 180°.
7. Vessel contains thrombus as indicated in the angiographic images or by IVUS or OCT.
8. Lesion or vessel involves a myocardial bridge.
9. Vessel has been previously treated with a stent at any time prior to the index procedure such that the Absorb BVS or XIENCE would need to cross the stent to reach the target lesion.
10. Vessel has been previously treated and the target lesion is within 5 mm proximal or distal to a previously treated lesion.
11. Target lesion located within an arterial or saphenous vein graft or distal to any arterial or saphenous vein graft.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Abbott Medical Devices
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen G Ellis, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH
Dean J Kereiakes, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
Gregg W Stone, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
Jennifer McMeans Jones
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Abbott Medical Devices
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Baptist Medical Center Princeton
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Alabama Hospital
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Thomas Hospital
Fairhope, Alabama, United States
Baptist Medical Center South
Montgomery, Alabama, United States
Chandler Regional Medical Center
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Banner Heart Hospital
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Scottsdale Healthcare
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Arkansas Heart Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
John Muir Medical Center - Concord Campus
Concord, California, United States
Washington Hospital
Fremont, California, United States
Scripps Green Hospital
La Jolla, California, United States
Scripps Memorial Hospital
La Jolla, California, United States
Good Samaritan Hospital
Los Angeles, California, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Sutter Central Valley Hospitals dba Memorial Medical Center
Modesto, California, United States
Mercy General Hospital
Sacramento, California, United States
UC Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Sutter Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Sharp Memorial Hospital
San Diego, California, United States
Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital
Santa Barbara, California, United States
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
Stanford, California, United States
Little Company Of Mary Hospital
Torrance, California, United States
Torrance Memorial Medical Center
Torrance, California, United States
UCH-Memorial Health Systems
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Medical Center of the Rockies
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
Yale-New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
St. Vincent's Medical Center
Stamford, Connecticut, United States
Christiana Care Health Services
Newark, Delaware, United States
Brandon Regional Hospital
Brandon, Florida, United States
Morton Plant Hospital
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Holy Cross Hospital
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Memorial Regional Hospital
Hollywood, Florida, United States
St. Vincent's Medical Center
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Baptist Medical Center - Downtown
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
University of Florida UF Health
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
University of Miami Hospital
Miami, Florida, United States
Baptist Hospital of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
MediQuest Research Group Inc at Munroe Regional Medical Center
Ocala, Florida, United States
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, United States
Palm Beach Gardens Medical Center
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, United States
Bay County Health Systems
Panama City, Florida, United States
Baptist Hospital
Pensacola, Florida, United States
Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
Florida Hospital Pepin Heart Institute
Tampa, Florida, United States
Piedmont Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Saint Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University Hospital
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Northeast Georgia Medical Center
Gainesville, Georgia, United States
Wellstar Kennestone Hospital
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Advocate Christ Medical Center
Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States
Saint Francis Medical Center
Peoria, Illinois, United States
St. John's Hospital
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Elkhart General Healthcare
Elkhart, Indiana, United States
Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Franciscan St. Francis Health
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Genesis Medical Center
Davenport, Iowa, United States
Mercy Medical
West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
The University of Kansas Hospital and Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
University of Kentucky Medical Center
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Jewish Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Eastern Maine Medical Center
Bangor, Maine, United States
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, United States
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Hyattsville, Maryland, United States
Union Memorial Hospital
Hyattsville, Maryland, United States
Peninsula Regional Medical Center
Salisbury, Maryland, United States
Washington Adventist Hospital
Takoma Park, Maryland, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Boston University Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center of Boston
Brighton, Massachusetts, United States
UMass Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Bay Regional Medical Center
Bay City, Michigan, United States
Oakwood Hospital and Medical Center
Dearborn, Michigan, United States
Harper University Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States
St. John Hospital & Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Borgess Medical Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
Sparrow Hospital
Lansing, Michigan, United States
Northern Michigan Hospital
Petoskey, Michigan, United States
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Munson Medical Center
Traverse City, Michigan, United States
St. Joseph Mercy Hospital
Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States
Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
North Memorial Medical Center
Robbinsdale, Minnesota, United States
North Mississippi Medical Center Cardiology Associates Research, LLC
Tupelo, Mississippi, United States
Boone Hospital Center
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Mercy Hospital Springfield
Springfield, Missouri, United States
Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
St. Anthony's Medical Center
St Louis, Missouri, United States
St. Patrick Hospital
Missoula, Montana, United States
Nebraska Heart Hospital
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
Englewood, New Jersey, United States
Cooper University Hospital
Haddon Heights, New Jersey, United States
Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center
Haddon Heights, New Jersey, United States
Morristown Medical Center
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
Jersey Shore University Medical Center
Neptune City, New Jersey, United States
St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center
Paterson, New Jersey, United States
The Valley Hospital
Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States
Presbyterian Hospital
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center
Liverpool, New York, United States
Long Island Jewish Medical Center
Manhasset, New York, United States
Winthrop University Hospital
Mineola, New York, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
New York Presbyterian Hospital-Cornell University
New York, New York, United States
Lennox Hill Hospital,
New York, New York, United States
Rochester General Hospital
Rochester, New York, United States
Strong Memorial Hospital
Rochester, New York, United States
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Stony Brook, New York, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Presbyterian Hospital
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Rex Hospital
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
WakeMed
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Aultman Hospital
Canton, Ohio, United States
University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
The Christ Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Tri-Health Good Samaritan Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Bethesda North Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, United States
EMH Healthcare
Elyria, Ohio, United States
Cleveland Cln Fairview Hospital
Fairview Park, Ohio, United States
Kettering Medical Center
Kettering, Ohio, United States
The Toledo Hospital
Toledo, Ohio, United States
Mercy St. Vincent's Medical Center
Toledo, Ohio, United States
Genesis-Good Samaritan Hospital
Zanesville, Ohio, United States
Integris Baptist Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Oklahoma Heart Hospital
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Hillcrest Medical Center
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Providence St. Vincent Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, United States
PeaceHealth Sacred Heart Medical Center
Springfield, Oregon, United States
Abington Memorial Hospital
Abington, Pennsylvania, United States
Holy Spirit Hospital
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, United States
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Doylestown Hospital
Doylestown, Pennsylvania, United States
UPMC Hamot
Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
St. Mary Medical Center
Langhorne, Pennsylvania, United States
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Pennsylvania Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
UPMC Presbyterian
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
UPMC Shadyside Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Pinnacle Health at Harrisburg Hospital
Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, United States
St. Joseph Medical Center
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States
York Hospital
York, Pennsylvania, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
The Miriam Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
AnMed Health
Anderson, South Carolina, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Sisters of Charity Providence Hospital
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Greenville Memorial Hospital of the Greenville Health System
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
St. Francis Health System
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Sanford USD Medical Center
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
Memorial Hospital
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Turkey Creek Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Northwest Texas Healthcare System
Amarillo, Texas, United States
Seton Medical Center Austin
Austin, Texas, United States
Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital
Dallas, Texas, United States
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Houston, Texas, United States
The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano
Plano, Texas, United States
Methodist Texsan Hospital
San Antonio, Texas, United States
East Texas Medical Center
Tyler, Texas, United States
Trinity Mother Frances Hospital Regional Healthcare Center
Tyler, Texas, United States
InterMountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, United States
Fletcher Allen Health Care
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Inova Fairfax Hospital
Falls Church, Virginia, United States
Mary Washington Hospital
Fredericksburg, Virginia, United States
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Winchester Medical Center
Winchester, Virginia, United States
St. Joseph Hospital
Bellingham, Washington, United States
Providence Regional Medical Center Everett
Everett, Washington, United States
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
St. Mary's Medical Center
Huntington, West Virginia, United States
Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Herston, Queensland, Australia
St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nishi T, Okada K, Kitahara H, Kameda R, Ikutomi M, Imura S, Hollak MB, Yock PG, Popma JJ, Kusano H, Cheong WF, Sudhir K, Fitzgerald PJ, Ellis SG, Kereiakes DJ, Stone GW, Honda Y, Kimura T; ABSORB III and ABSORB Japan Investigators. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of long-term outcomes following ABSORB bioresorbable scaffold implantation: A pooled analysis of the ABSORB III and ABSORB Japan trials. J Cardiol. 2021 Sep;78(3):224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
Stone GW, Kimura T, Gao R, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Onuma Y, Chevalier B, Simonton C, Dressler O, Crowley A, Ali ZA, Serruys PW. Time-Varying Outcomes With the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold During 5-Year Follow-up: A Systematic Meta-analysis and Individual Patient Data Pooled Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Dec 1;4(12):1261-1269. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4101.
Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Rizik DG, Teirstein PS, Litt MR, Kini A, Kabour A, Marx SO, Popma JJ, Tan SH, Ediebah DE, Simonton C, Stone GW; ABSORB III Investigators. Clinical Outcomes Before and After Complete Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Resorption: Five-Year Follow-Up From the ABSORB III Trial. Circulation. 2019 Dec 3;140(23):1895-1903. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042584. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Metzger C, Caputo RP, Rizik DG, Teirstein PS, Litt MR, Kini A, Kabour A, Marx SO, Popma JJ, McGreevy R, Zhang Z, Simonton C, Stone GW; ABSORB III Investigators. 3-Year Clinical Outcomes With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: The ABSORB III Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2852-2862. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
Ali ZA, Gao R, Kimura T, Onuma Y, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Chevalier B, Vu MT, Zhang Z, Simonton CA, Serruys PW, Stone GW. Three-Year Outcomes With the Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold: Individual-Patient-Data Meta-Analysis From the ABSORB Randomized Trials. Circulation. 2018 Jan 30;137(5):464-479. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031843. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
Baron SJ, Lei Y, Chinnakondepalli K, Vilain K, Magnuson EA, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Stone GW, Cohen DJ; ABSORB III Investigators. Economic Outcomes of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 1-Year Results From the ABSORB III Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr 24;10(8):774-782. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.01.022.
Stone GW, Gao R, Kimura T, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Onuma Y, Cheong WF, Jones-McMeans J, Su X, Zhang Z, Serruys PW. 1-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: a patient-level, pooled meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016 Mar 26;387(10025):1277-89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01039-9. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
Ellis SG, Kereiakes DJ, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Rizik DG, Teirstein PS, Litt MR, Kini A, Kabour A, Marx SO, Popma JJ, McGreevy R, Zhang Z, Simonton C, Stone GW; ABSORB III Investigators. Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1905-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509038. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Samady H, Jones-McMeans J, Zhang Z, Cheong WF, Su X, Ben-Yehuda O, Stone GW. Evaluation of a fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: design of and rationale for the ABSORB III randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2015 Oct;170(4):641-651.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10-392
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.