CTOP/ITE/MTX Compared With CHOP as the First-line Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Young Patients With T Cell Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT01746992

Last Updated: 2017-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-30

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

T cell lymphoma is a heterogenic malignancy with poor outcome. Five-year PFS and OS of the patients recieved classic CHOP regimen(cyclophosphamide,vincristin,doxorubicin and predisone)is less than 30%.High dose intensive chemotherapy doesn't demonstrate better response. At present, there is no standardized treatment protocol for this kind of lymphoma.

Between 1994 and 1998,the Scotland and Newcastle Lymphoma Group prospectively collected data on newly diagnosed patients with enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL)in the Northern Region of England and Scotland,which is a rare and aggressive type of peripheral T-cell lymphoma.The novel regimen IVE/MTX (ifosfamide, vincristine, etoposide/methotrexate)-ASCT was piloted for patients eligible for intensive treatment,followed by auto-stem cell transplantation.Five-years PFS and OS were 52% and 60% respectively, significantly improved compared with the historical group treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The encouraged results were extended to the peripherial T cell lymphoma-non specified(PTCL-nos).

Past studies suggested pirarubicin was more active to the T cell lymphoma than doxorubicin in vitro based on its high concentration in tumor cells. Clinical data also presented equivalent even superior efficacy of pirarubicin with lower toxicity than doxorubicin. The aim of our study is to compare the response and survival rate of CTOP/ITE/MTX (cyclophosphamide, vincristin,pirarubicin and predisone/ ifosfamide, pirarubicin, etoposide/methotrexate) with those of CHOP regimen,looking forward to its superiority in efficacy and safety for the de novo young patients with T cell lymphoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

ALK-negative Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Peripherial T Cell Lymphoma,Not Otherwise Specified Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma Enteropathy Associated T Cell Lymphoma Hepatosplenic T Cell Lymphoma Subcutaneous Panniculitis Like T Cell Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

pirarubicin

3 cycles of CTOP(cyclophosphamide,vincristin,pirarubicin and prednisone),3 cycles of ITE(ifosfamide, pirarubicin, etoposide)and 2 cycles of methotrexate

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

day 1 in both arms

Vincristine 1.4mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

day 1

prednisone 60mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

day1-day5

ifosfamide 2000mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

day 22-day 24

pirarubicin 50mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

day 1

pirarubicin 25mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

day 22

Etoposide phosphate 100mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

day 22-day 24

methotrexate 1500mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

day 43

doxorubicin

8 cycles of CHOP regimen(cyclophosphamide,vincristin,doxorubicin and prednisone)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

day 1 in both arms

Vincristine 1.4mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

day 1

Doxorubicin 50mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

day 1

prednisone 60mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

day1-day5

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2

day 1 in both arms

Intervention Type DRUG

Vincristine 1.4mg/m2

day 1

Intervention Type DRUG

Doxorubicin 50mg/m2

day 1

Intervention Type DRUG

prednisone 60mg/m2

day1-day5

Intervention Type DRUG

ifosfamide 2000mg/m2

day 22-day 24

Intervention Type DRUG

pirarubicin 50mg/m2

day 1

Intervention Type DRUG

pirarubicin 25mg/m2

day 22

Intervention Type DRUG

Etoposide phosphate 100mg/m2

day 22-day 24

Intervention Type DRUG

methotrexate 1500mg/m2

day 43

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CTX VCR ADM PRED IFO THP THP VP-16 MTX

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* pathologic verified mature T cell lymphoma,including ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma,peripherial T cell lymphoma-non specific type,angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma,enteropathy associated T cell lymphoma and hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma
* SGOT/SGPT no more than 2 times of UNL
* serum creatinine no more than 1.5 times of UNL
* signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* woman in pregnancy or lactation
* allergic to any intervention drug
* insuitable to the study due to severe complication
* enrolled to other study during the past 6 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruijin Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zhao Weili

vice director of Department of Hematology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ruijin hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CTOP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id