Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Mirabegron + Solifenacin in Overactive Bladder Patients (NCT NCT01745094)
NCT ID: NCT01745094
Last Updated: 2018-02-28
Results Overview
TEAEs were defined as AEs observed after the first administration of the study drugs for the treatment period. The investigator assessed the severity of AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values, Electrocardiogram (ECG), vital signs, as follows: Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities; Moderate: Affected normal daily activities; Severe: Inability to perform daily activities. A drug-related TEAE was a TEAE with at least a possible relationship to the study drug as assessed by the investigator.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
223 participants
From first dose of study drug up to weeks 16
2018-02-28
Participant Flow
Participants with overactive bladder (OAB) were enrolled in 29 sites in Japan.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
35
|
37
|
58
|
93
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
30
|
37
|
46
|
90
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
0
|
12
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Not Meeting the Eligibility Criteria
|
1
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Need Further Examinations Due to Biopsy
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Show no Stable Solifenacin Intake
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Untenable Due to Recurrent Cystitis
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period, and who provided evaluable patient diary data for at least 1 efficacy variable, before and after the start of the treatment period. Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=35 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=58 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Total
n=223 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
65.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.71 • n=35 Participants
|
62.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.27 • n=37 Participants
|
66.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.47 • n=58 Participants
|
63.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.34 • n=93 Participants
|
64.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.92 • n=223 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
186 Participants
n=223 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=223 Participants
|
|
Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS)
|
7.1 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.31 • n=33 Participants • Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period, and who provided evaluable patient diary data for at least 1 efficacy variable, before and after the start of the treatment period. Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
8.5 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.36 • n=37 Participants • Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period, and who provided evaluable patient diary data for at least 1 efficacy variable, before and after the start of the treatment period. Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
7.5 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.67 • n=55 Participants • Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period, and who provided evaluable patient diary data for at least 1 efficacy variable, before and after the start of the treatment period. Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
8.1 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.45 • n=93 Participants • Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period, and who provided evaluable patient diary data for at least 1 efficacy variable, before and after the start of the treatment period. Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
7.8 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.49 • n=218 Participants • Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period, and who provided evaluable patient diary data for at least 1 efficacy variable, before and after the start of the treatment period. Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Overactive Bladder questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) Score: Symptom Severity
|
33.94 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.386 • n=33 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
39.37 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.470 • n=37 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
32.12 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.701 • n=55 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
31.29 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.205 • n=93 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
33.27 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.328 • n=218 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
OAB-q SF Score: Total Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)
|
73.71 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.662 • n=33 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
70.31 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.873 • n=37 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
75.10 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.708 • n=55 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
76.06 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.341 • n=93 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
74.49 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.743 • n=218 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Number of Micturitions per 24 Hours
|
10.38 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.128 • n=33 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
11.12 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.722 • n=37 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
9.81 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.918 • n=55 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
10.15 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.331 • n=93 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
10.26 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.302 • n=218 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Number of Urgency Episodes per 24 Hours
|
2.86 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.433 • n=30 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
4.12 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.586 • n=36 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
2.86 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.997 • n=49 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
3.63 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.846 • n=90 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
3.42 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.586 • n=205 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Number of Incontinence Episodes per 24 Hours
|
1.45 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.454 • n=14 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.54 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.248 • n=28 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
2.09 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.121 • n=29 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.51 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.520 • n=60 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.64 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.616 • n=131 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes per 24 Hours
|
1.42 urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.506 • n=11 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.42 urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.243 • n=28 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.69 urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.366 • n=26 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.30 urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.138 • n=52 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.43 urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.245 • n=117 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Volume Voided per Micturition
|
158.627 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.0511 • n=33 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
158.633 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.6678 • n=37 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
182.362 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 56.3405 • n=55 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
173.658 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.5973 • n=93 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
171.029 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 49.7826 • n=218 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Number of Nocturia Episodes per Night
|
1.79 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.075 • n=28 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.55 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.783 • n=29 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.85 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.006 • n=50 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.72 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.084 • n=81 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.74 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.018 • n=188 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
|
14.95 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.214 • n=35 Participants
|
10.51 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.066 • n=37 Participants
|
13.93 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.188 • n=58 Participants
|
12.11 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.199 • n=93 Participants
|
12.76 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.273 • n=223 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to weeks 16Population: SAF
TEAEs were defined as AEs observed after the first administration of the study drugs for the treatment period. The investigator assessed the severity of AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values, Electrocardiogram (ECG), vital signs, as follows: Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities; Moderate: Affected normal daily activities; Severe: Inability to perform daily activities. A drug-related TEAE was a TEAE with at least a possible relationship to the study drug as assessed by the investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=35 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=58 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Drug-related TEAEs
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Deaths
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Serious TEAEs
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Drug-related Serious TEAEs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation (PD)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Drug-related TEAEs leading to PD
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Any TEAEs
|
23 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
69 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Mild
|
22 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
67 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Moderate
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 8, 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
The OABSS questionnaire was a questionnaire completed by participants with 4 questions regarding their OAB symptoms. For each participant, the OABSS total score was calculated from the sum total of the score of each question. The total score ranges from 0 to 15 with higher score indicating more symptoms. The OABSS data obtained at week 0 were used as baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in OABSS Total Score
Week 8
|
-3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.32
|
-2.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.22
|
-3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
-2.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in OABSS Total Score
Week 16
|
-3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.60
|
-3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.70
|
-3.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.90
|
-4.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in OABSS Total Score
Week 16 (LOCF)
|
-3.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.95
|
-3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.70
|
-3.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.86
|
-4.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8 and 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
Normalization for OABSS Total Score was defined as OABSS total score ≤ 2 or OABSS Question 3 score ≤ 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Normalization for OABSS Total Score
Week 8
|
19 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Normalization for OABSS Total Score
Week 16
|
18 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Normalization for OABSS Total Score
Week 16 (LOCF)
|
19 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 8, 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
The OAB-q SF questionnaire was a questionnaire completed by participants composed of 2 sections: Severity Symptom and the Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL). The Severity Symptom section included 6 questions. For each participant, the symptom severity score was derived as a sum of scores for Questions 1 to 6. The total score ranges from 6 to 36 with higher symptom severity score indicating greater symptom bother. OAB-q SF data obtained at week 0 visit were used as baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) Severity Score
Week 8
|
-19.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.735
|
-12.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.926
|
-15.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.348
|
-10.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.222
|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) Severity Score
Week 16
|
-21.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.557
|
-22.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.877
|
-17.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.930
|
-16.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.171
|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) Severity Score
Week 16 (LOCF)
|
-21.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.631
|
-22.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.877
|
-17.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.253
|
-16.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.034
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 8, 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
The OAB-q SF questionnaire was a questionnaire completed by participants composed of 2 sections: Severity Symptom and the HRQL. The HRQL section included 13 questions. For each participant, the total HRQL score was derived as a sum of scores for Questions 7 to 19. The total score ranges from 13 to 78 with higher total HRQL score indicating greater HRQL. OAB-q SF data obtained at week 0 visit were used as baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in OAB-q SF Total HRQL Score
Week 8
|
15.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.786
|
9.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.559
|
12.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.449
|
6.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.797
|
|
Change From Baseline in OAB-q SF Total HRQL Score
Week 16
|
17.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.349
|
16.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.439
|
14.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.428
|
12.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.170
|
|
Change From Baseline in OAB-q SF Total HRQL Score
Week 16 (LOCF)
|
17.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.005
|
16.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.439
|
13.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.080
|
12.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.022
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated by taking the sum of all marked episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urinated" was indicated, divided by the number of days on which episodes were recorded.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 12
|
-1.98 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.667
|
-2.40 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.997
|
-1.50 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.850
|
-1.75 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.136
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 4
|
-0.34 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.576
|
-0.98 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.977
|
-1.33 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.604
|
-1.02 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.666
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 8
|
-1.69 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.690
|
-1.31 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.862
|
-1.74 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.586
|
-1.32 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.656
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 16
|
-2.06 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.677
|
-2.36 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.106
|
-1.90 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.920
|
-2.13 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.118
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 16 (LOCF)
|
-1.89 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.789
|
-2.36 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.106
|
-1.94 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.792
|
-2.12 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.094
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
Normalization for the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was defined as \< 8 micturitions per 24 hours.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number for Participants Who Achieved Normalization of the Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
|
10 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. An urgency episode was defined as a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer. The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated by taking the sum of all marked episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urgency" was indicated, divided by the number of days on which episodes were recorded. Only participants who had an urgency episode at baseline was included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=36 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=49 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 4
|
-1.15 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.843
|
-1.26 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.927
|
-1.45 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.790
|
-1.43 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.057
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 8
|
-1.77 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 0.969
|
-1.49 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.897
|
-1.76 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.490
|
-1.37 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.189
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 12
|
-1.95 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.279
|
-2.55 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.162
|
-1.89 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.674
|
-1.88 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.576
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 16
|
-1.77 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.253
|
-2.59 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.201
|
-1.93 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.759
|
-2.06 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.419
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 16 (LOCF)
|
-1.57 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.382
|
-2.59 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.201
|
-1.93 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.877
|
-2.02 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.392
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
Normalization for the mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was defined as no urgency episode per 24 hours.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number for Participants Who Achieved Normalization of the Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
|
16 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated by taking the sum of all marked episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urinary incontinence'" was indicated, divided by the number of days on which episodes were recorded. Only participants who had an incontinence episode at baseline was included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=60 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 8
|
-1.06 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.983
|
-0.73 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.842
|
-1.26 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.453
|
-0.76 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.273
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 12
|
-1.31 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.236
|
-1.04 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.177
|
-1.03 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.238
|
-0.93 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.248
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 4
|
-0.85 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.675
|
-0.55 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.787
|
-1.12 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.141
|
-0.64 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.032
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 16
|
-1.22 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.076
|
-1.08 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.168
|
-1.32 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.517
|
-1.08 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.068
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 16 (LOCF)
|
-1.07 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.064
|
-1.08 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.168
|
-1.32 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.505
|
-1.06 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.055
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
Normalization for the mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was defined as no incontinence episode per 24 hours.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number for Participants Who Achieved Normalization of the Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
|
10 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
46 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. An urge incontinence episode was defined as any episode when both urgency and incontinence occurred concurrently. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated by taking the sum of all marked episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urgency" and "urinary incontinence'" were indicated, divided by the number of days on which episodes were recorded. Only participants who had an urge incontinence episode at baseline was included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=52 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 12
|
-1.30 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.252
|
-0.94 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.115
|
-0.84 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.996
|
-0.91 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.160
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 4
|
-0.87 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.689
|
-0.50 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.756
|
-0.77 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.220
|
-0.82 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.055
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 8
|
-1.17 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.045
|
-0.65 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.793
|
-1.07 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.068
|
-0.72 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.208
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 16
|
-1.07 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.940
|
-1.00 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.089
|
-1.11 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.089
|
-0.96 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.040
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 16 (LOCF)
|
-0.97 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.948
|
-1.00 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.089
|
-1.04 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.412
|
-0.94 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.027
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 8, 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. The mean volume per micturition was calculated by taking the sum of the urinary volumes where the volume voided was \> 0 and where "urinary incontinence" was not indicated in the patient diary, divided by the number of micturitions where the volume voided was \> 0 and where "urinary incontinence" was not indicated. Only participants who had volume voided was \> 0 at baseline was included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 8
|
22.120 mL
Standard Deviation 26.2220
|
19.380 mL
Standard Deviation 31.5492
|
33.781 mL
Standard Deviation 32.6029
|
24.821 mL
Standard Deviation 35.8941
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week16
|
28.532 mL
Standard Deviation 32.2243
|
33.031 mL
Standard Deviation 38.2492
|
35.780 mL
Standard Deviation 33.8236
|
36.921 mL
Standard Deviation 43.8896
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 16 (LOCF)
|
29.865 mL
Standard Deviation 32.5400
|
33.031 mL
Standard Deviation 38.2492
|
34.118 mL
Standard Deviation 32.6790
|
36.957 mL
Standard Deviation 43.6344
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of study) was performed to ensure all patients with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of study analysis.
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void. Night time was defined as the period between bedtime and the wake-up time the following day (micturitions at the same time as the wake-up time were excluded). The mean number of nocturia episodes per night was calculated by taking the sum of nocturia episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urinated" was indicated during the night time, divided by the number of nights. Only participants who had a nocturia episode at baseline was included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=50 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=81 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Week 4
|
0.17 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 1,122
|
-0.07 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.787
|
-0.45 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.709
|
-0.27 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.738
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Week 8
|
-0.38 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.681
|
-0.21 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.688
|
-0.37 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.682
|
-0.44 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.825
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Week 12
|
-0.35 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.704
|
-0.48 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.796
|
-0.29 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.829
|
-0.58 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.916
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Week 16
|
-0.38 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.881
|
-0.31 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.674
|
-0.44 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.813
|
-0.61 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.992
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Week 16 (LOCF)
|
-0.43 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.847
|
-0.31 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.674
|
-0.44 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.812
|
-0.60 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.982
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16Population: SAF
Measurement of PVR volume was made using either ultrasonography or urethral catheterization, provided that the same method was used for the same participant throughout the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=35 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=58 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 4
|
-4.95 mL
Standard Deviation 18.078
|
5.88 mL
Standard Deviation 17.709
|
13.78 mL
Standard Deviation 35.702
|
4.36 mL
Standard Deviation 20.797
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 8
|
-2.83 mL
Standard Deviation 19.442
|
5.07 mL
Standard Deviation 19.512
|
11.05 mL
Standard Deviation 32.310
|
1.87 mL
Standard Deviation 13.428
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 12
|
-2.53 mL
Standard Deviation 21.047
|
5.29 mL
Standard Deviation 22.163
|
6.51 mL
Standard Deviation 22.067
|
1.17 mL
Standard Deviation 17.997
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 16
|
0.63 mL
Standard Deviation 24.102
|
3.96 mL
Standard Deviation 14.897
|
7.31 mL
Standard Deviation 22.754
|
3.60 mL
Standard Deviation 24.223
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 16 (LOCF)
|
-0.42 mL
Standard Deviation 23.576
|
3.96 mL
Standard Deviation 14.897
|
8.00 mL
Standard Deviation 28.833
|
3.17 mL
Standard Deviation 24.144
|
Adverse Events
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=35 participants at risk
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 participants at risk
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=58 participants at risk
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 participants at risk
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.1%
1/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Patella fracture
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.2%
2/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Blood urea increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
ECG ST segment depression
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Polymyalgia rheumatica
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.1%
1/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
2.9%
1/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=35 participants at risk
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 2.5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=37 participants at risk
Participants received solifenacin 2.5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 2.5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg
n=58 participants at risk
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks.
|
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
n=93 participants at risk
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 8 weeks, participants continued to receive solifenacin 5 mg, but received an increased dose of mirabegron 50 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.2%
2/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
2.9%
1/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.2%
2/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
5.7%
2/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.7%
2/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
5.4%
2/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
8.6%
5/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
7.5%
7/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
4.3%
4/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.2%
2/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
General disorders
Thirst
|
2.9%
1/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.2%
3/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
8.6%
3/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
4.3%
4/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
2.9%
1/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.1%
1/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.9%
1/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal burn
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.1%
1/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
5.2%
3/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.2%
2/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
5.2%
3/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.2%
3/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
2.9%
1/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.2%
3/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.4%
2/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
5.7%
2/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
5.4%
2/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.2%
3/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
11.4%
4/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
13.5%
5/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
10.3%
6/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
14.0%
13/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
2.9%
1/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.2%
3/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.2%
2/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.4%
2/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Blood urea increased
|
8.6%
3/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
8.1%
3/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
13.8%
8/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
16.1%
15/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Blood uric acid decreased
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
8.6%
3/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
8.1%
3/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
5.2%
3/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
8.6%
8/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Glucose urine present
|
5.7%
2/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
5.2%
3/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.2%
3/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count increased
|
2.9%
1/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Protein urine present
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
5.4%
2/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Urinary sediment abnormal
|
14.3%
5/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
5.2%
3/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
7.5%
7/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
5.7%
2/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
8.1%
3/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
6.5%
6/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
|
2.9%
1/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cells urine positive
|
5.7%
2/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.1%
1/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.2%
2/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
2.9%
1/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.4%
2/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.1%
1/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.7%
1/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.1%
1/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract inflammation
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.1%
1/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
2.9%
1/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry Mouth
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.7%
1/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
11.4%
4/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
8.1%
3/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
8.6%
5/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
6.5%
6/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/35 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/58 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.2%
2/93 • From first dose of study drug up to week 16
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Institute and/or Principal Investigator may publish trial data generated at their specific study site after Sponsor publication of the multi center data. Sponsor must receive a site's manuscript prior to publication for review and comment.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER