Safety/Effectiveness Study of Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release Capsules (RP103) in Cysteamine Treatment Naive Patients With Cystinosis
NCT ID: NCT01744782
Last Updated: 2024-12-27
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
17 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-12-20
2016-12-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In cystinosis, the body builds up cystine. When taken regularly, the active ingredient of an older, already approved drug called Cystagon® (cysteamine bitartrate) reduces cystine in the body. RP103 has the same active ingredient as Cystagon® and is designed to reduce cystine in a similar way that Cystagon® does. RP103 is also different from Cystagon®: Instead of the cysteamine bitartrate being absorbed from the stomach, RP103 is designed to be absorbed from the small intestine. This may make the effects of the drug last longer, so that it can be taken twice a day instead of four times a day like Cystagon®.
To decide if RP103 is effective, the study used two types of blood tests. One test is pharmacodynamics (PD), which measures the amount of white blood cell (WBC) cystine after taking study drug. WBC cystine is a laboratory test used to find out if cysteamine bitartrate is reducing cystine levels in the body. The second test is pharmacokinetics (PK), which measures the amount of cysteamine in the blood after taking the drug.
Study with completed results acquired from Horizon in 2024.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RP103
From Day 1 and throughout the duration of participation, RP103 (Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release Capsules) was administered every 12 hours (Q12H), supplied as 75 mg and 25 mg capsules.
RP103
Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release Capsules (RP103) were administered twice daily, orally or via gastrostomy tube (G-tube), after a 2-hour fast. The starting dose was one-quarter of the RP103 targeted maintenance dose based on age, weight, and body surface area. The recommended targeted maintenance dose for children up to 6 years old was 1 gram/m²/day, in 2 divided doses given Q12H. The dose was gradually escalated, in 10% steps, based on monitoring of WBC cystine levels 30 minutes after the morning RP103 dose collected every 2 weeks, until the participant's WBC cystine level was \<1 nmol ½ cystine/mg protein.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
RP103
Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release Capsules (RP103) were administered twice daily, orally or via gastrostomy tube (G-tube), after a 2-hour fast. The starting dose was one-quarter of the RP103 targeted maintenance dose based on age, weight, and body surface area. The recommended targeted maintenance dose for children up to 6 years old was 1 gram/m²/day, in 2 divided doses given Q12H. The dose was gradually escalated, in 10% steps, based on monitoring of WBC cystine levels 30 minutes after the morning RP103 dose collected every 2 weeks, until the participant's WBC cystine level was \<1 nmol ½ cystine/mg protein.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No clinically significant change in liver function tests, i.e. 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and/or 1.5 times ULN for total bilirubin, within 6 months prior to Screening
* No clinically significant change in renal function, i.e. estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) within 6 months prior to Screening
* Must have an estimated GFR \> 20 mL/minute/1.73m² (using the equation from Schwartz 2009 J Am Soc Nephrol 20:629-647)
* Female participants who are sexually active and of childbearing potential, i.e. not surgically sterile (tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy) or at least 2 years naturally postmenopausal must agree to use an acceptable form of contraception from Screening through completion of the study. Acceptable forms of contraception for this study include hormonal contraceptives (oral, implant, transdermal patch, or injection) at a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to Screening, barrier (spermicidal condom or diaphragm with spermicide), IUD, or a partner who has been vasectomized for at least 6 months. Childbearing potential was defined as a female who had reached menarche.
* Participant or their parent or guardian must provide written informed consent and assent (where applicable) prior to participation in the study
* Had not taken any form of cysteamine bitartrate in the past
Exclusion Criteria
* Inflammatory bowel disease if currently active, or prior resection of the small intestine
* Heart disease (e.g., myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable arrhythmias, or poorly controlled hypertension) within 90 days prior to Screening
* Active bleeding disorder within 90 days prior to Screening
* History of malignant disease within 2 years prior to Screening
* Hemoglobin level of \< 10 g/dL at Screening or, in the opinion of the investigator, a hemoglobin level that would make it unsafe for study participation
* Known hypersensitivity to penicillamine
* Female subjects who were nursing, planning a pregnancy, or were known or suspected to be pregnant
* Participants who, in the opinion of the investigator, were not able or willing to comply with study requirements
* Had received a kidney transplant or was currently on dialysis
* Was 6 years of age or older at the time of the Screening visit
6 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Amgen
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Amgen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schwartz GJ, Munoz A, Schneider MF, Mak RH, Kaskel F, Warady BA, Furth SL. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Mar;20(3):629-37. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008030287. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RP103-08
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id