The ProCaRis Study: Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in General Practice
NCT ID: NCT01739062
Last Updated: 2023-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
5000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-02-28
2031-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Genetic risk assessment
At least 40 SNP (single nucleotide polymorphisms)increase the risk of PCa. The individual risk of PCa accumulates with the increasing number of these genetic variants. The risk is doubled if patient has familial disposition as well. In retrospective studies, non-genetic risk-prediction models were compared to risk-prediction models containing both non-genetic factors and SNPs analyses. The genetic models had a significantly higher specificity than the non-genetic models. It has been argued that genetic PCa risk assessment could reduce the inexpedient use of PSA tests, saving it for patients at high risk of PCa.
Genetic risk assessment
Familial disposition risk assessment
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Genetic risk assessment
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* elevated PSA-level (\> 4,0 ng/ml) concurrently or within previous 2 years
* prostate or bladder disease
* prostate cancer
* non-Caucasians
* do not speak and understand Danish
18 Years
80 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Velux Fonden
OTHER
Aarhus University Hospital
OTHER
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karina D Sørensen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
Flemming Bro, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
The Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Denmark
Peter Vedsted, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Danish Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Aarhus University, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Molecular Medicine
Aarhus N, Aarhus, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fredsoe J, Kirkegaard P, Edwards A, Vedsted P, Sorensen KD, Bro F. A genetic risk assessment for prostate cancer influences patients' risk perception and use of repeat PSA testing: a cross-sectional study in Danish general practice. BJGP Open. 2020 Jun 23;4(2):bjgpopen20X101039. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101039. Print 2020.
Fredsoe J, Koetsenruyter J, Vedsted P, Kirkegaard P, Vaeth M, Edwards A, Orntoft TF, Sorensen KD, Bro F. The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 7;17(2):e1003033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003033. eCollection 2020 Feb.
Kirkegaard P, Edwards A, Nielsen TLO, Orntoft TF, Sorensen KD, Borre M, Bro F. Perceptions about screening for prostate cancer using genetic lifetime risk assessment: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0717-6.
Kirkegaard P, Vedsted P, Edwards A, Fenger-Gron M, Bro F. A cluster-randomised, parallel group, controlled intervention study of genetic prostate cancer risk assessment and use of PSA tests in general practice--the ProCaRis study: study protocol. BMJ Open. 2013 Mar 1;3(3):e002452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002452.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-41-6904
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id