The ProCaRis Study: Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in General Practice

NCT ID: NCT01739062

Last Updated: 2023-12-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-02-28

Study Completion Date

2031-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The preferred method for early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in older men with family history is the Prostate Specific Antigen test (PSA test), although the method is imprecise. It produces a high number of false-positive results and increases the risk of over-diagnosis and over-treatment. Yet, an increasing number of men get the PSA test as part of unsystematic screening. Genetic risk assessment may be a better way to identify men with low risk of PCa. The main study hypothesis is that genetic information about low risk of PCa can reduce the number of patients who get a PSA test as part of unsystematic screening.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

PSA test Prostate cancer Genetic screening

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Genetic risk assessment

At least 40 SNP (single nucleotide polymorphisms)increase the risk of PCa. The individual risk of PCa accumulates with the increasing number of these genetic variants. The risk is doubled if patient has familial disposition as well. In retrospective studies, non-genetic risk-prediction models were compared to risk-prediction models containing both non-genetic factors and SNPs analyses. The genetic models had a significantly higher specificity than the non-genetic models. It has been argued that genetic PCa risk assessment could reduce the inexpedient use of PSA tests, saving it for patients at high risk of PCa.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Genetic risk assessment

Intervention Type GENETIC

Familial disposition risk assessment

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Genetic risk assessment

Intervention Type GENETIC

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Single nucleotide polymorphism

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients who receive a PSA test

Exclusion Criteria

* age over 80 years
* elevated PSA-level (\> 4,0 ng/ml) concurrently or within previous 2 years
* prostate or bladder disease
* prostate cancer
* non-Caucasians
* do not speak and understand Danish
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Velux Fonden

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Aarhus University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karina D Sørensen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Flemming Bro, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Denmark

Peter Vedsted, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Danish Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Aarhus University, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Molecular Medicine

Aarhus N, Aarhus, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fredsoe J, Kirkegaard P, Edwards A, Vedsted P, Sorensen KD, Bro F. A genetic risk assessment for prostate cancer influences patients' risk perception and use of repeat PSA testing: a cross-sectional study in Danish general practice. BJGP Open. 2020 Jun 23;4(2):bjgpopen20X101039. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101039. Print 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32457098 (View on PubMed)

Fredsoe J, Koetsenruyter J, Vedsted P, Kirkegaard P, Vaeth M, Edwards A, Orntoft TF, Sorensen KD, Bro F. The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 7;17(2):e1003033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003033. eCollection 2020 Feb.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32032355 (View on PubMed)

Kirkegaard P, Edwards A, Nielsen TLO, Orntoft TF, Sorensen KD, Borre M, Bro F. Perceptions about screening for prostate cancer using genetic lifetime risk assessment: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0717-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29454309 (View on PubMed)

Kirkegaard P, Vedsted P, Edwards A, Fenger-Gron M, Bro F. A cluster-randomised, parallel group, controlled intervention study of genetic prostate cancer risk assessment and use of PSA tests in general practice--the ProCaRis study: study protocol. BMJ Open. 2013 Mar 1;3(3):e002452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002452.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23457331 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-41-6904

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id