Trial Outcomes & Findings for The HAART 300 Annuloplasty Ring Trial Extended Safety and Performance (NCT NCT01732835)
NCT ID: NCT01732835
Last Updated: 2017-03-10
Results Overview
COMPLETED
NA
68 participants
6 months
2017-03-10
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
6-month Primary Endpoint
STARTED
|
68
|
|
6-month Primary Endpoint
COMPLETED
|
44
|
|
6-month Primary Endpoint
NOT COMPLETED
|
24
|
|
2-year Extended Follow-up
STARTED
|
44
|
|
2-year Extended Follow-up
COMPLETED
|
39
|
|
2-year Extended Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
6-month Primary Endpoint
Did not receive device
|
19
|
|
6-month Primary Endpoint
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
|
6-month Primary Endpoint
Adverse Event
|
3
|
|
2-year Extended Follow-up
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
|
2-year Extended Follow-up
Adverse Event
|
3
|
|
2-year Extended Follow-up
Death
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity
I
|
11 participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity
II
|
25 participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity
III
|
13 participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity
IV
|
0 participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Peak gradient
|
11.1 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 • n=43 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
|
|
Mean gradient
|
5.5 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=43 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
|
|
Left ventricular (LV) mass
|
244.1 g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 85.2 • n=39 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
|
|
Left ventricular internal dimension (LVID) diastole
|
5.50 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.86 • n=40 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
|
|
LVID systole
|
4.02 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.83 • n=35 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
|
|
LV diastolic volume
|
155.3 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 63.3 • n=27 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
|
|
LV systolic volume
|
76.5 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.7 • n=28 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
|
|
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
|
54.2 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=27 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
|
|
Cardiac output
|
6.20 l/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.17 • n=32 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
|
|
Cardiac index
|
3.16 l/min/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.11 • n=32 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
24 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
25 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=49 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
17 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
32 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
|
5 participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
44 participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Aortic Insufficiency
0
|
0 participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Aortic Insufficiency
1+
|
3 participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Aortic Insufficiency
2+
|
10 participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Aortic Insufficiency
3+
|
18 participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Aortic Insufficiency
4+
|
12 participants
n=49 Participants
|
|
Aortic Insufficiency
Not evaluable
|
6 participants
n=49 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsOutcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 6 Months Postprocedure
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 92.8 to 100.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
Assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=41 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months
0
|
11 participants
|
|
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months
1+
|
21 participants
|
|
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months
2+
|
7 participants
|
|
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months
3+
|
2 participants
|
|
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months
4+
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: discharge or 14 days postprocedure, whichever comes firstSuccess is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge or 14 days after the procedure: - Aortic annular dissection, rupture, or leaflet damage - Mitral valve impingement due to implant - implant dehiscence/migration into aorta - implant dehiscence/migration into left ventricle - Hemodynamics requiring intervention - Other adverse event resulting in reoperation, explantation, or permanent disability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Implant Procedure Success
|
95.9 percentage of implant procedures
Interval 86.0 to 99.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsFreedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events at 6 months postprocedure: - Device-related mortality - Complete heart block - Structural device failure - Endocarditis - Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence - Thromboembolism - Bleeding Event - Native Valve Deterioration - Valve Thrombosis - Hemolysis - Reoperation and explant at 6 months
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events
|
89.6 percentage of participants
Interval 80.9 to 98.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsOutcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 2 Years Postprocedure
|
97.6 percentage of participants
Interval 83.9 to 99.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
Assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=37 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years
0
|
2 participants
|
|
Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years
1+
|
25 participants
|
|
Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years
2+
|
10 participants
|
|
Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years
3+
|
0 participants
|
|
Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years
4+
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with an evaluation of this measure.
Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=43 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 6 Months
I
|
30 participants
|
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 6 Months
II
|
13 participants
|
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 6 Months
III
|
0 participants
|
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 6 Months
IV
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: Participants with an evaluation of this measure.
Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=38 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 2 Years
I
|
28 participants
|
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 2 Years
II
|
9 participants
|
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 2 Years
III
|
1 participants
|
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 2 Years
IV
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.
Transthoracic echocardiography parameter
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=36 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline
|
5.3 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 6.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.
Transthoracic echocardiography parameter
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=34 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline
|
5.9 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 10.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.
Transthoracic echocardiography parameter
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=36 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline
|
2.6 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 3.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.
Transthoracic echocardiography parameter
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=34 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline
|
3.1 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 5.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.
Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=29 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
LV Mass - Change From Baseline
|
-26.5 g
Standard Deviation 60.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.
Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=24 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
LV Mass - Change From Baseline
|
-27.4 g
Standard Deviation 60.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.
Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=30 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
LVID Diastole - Change From Baseline
|
-0.48 cm
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.
Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=24 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
LVID Diastole - Change From Baseline
|
-0.22 cm
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.
Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=25 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
LVID Systole - Change From Baseline
|
-0.48 cm
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.
Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=17 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
LVID Systole - Change From Baseline
|
-0.22 cm
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.
Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=16 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline
|
-21.8 ml
Standard Deviation 49.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.
Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=18 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline
|
-19.9 ml
Standard Deviation 53.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.
Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=17 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline
|
-17.5 ml
Standard Deviation 30.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.
Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=19 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline
|
-11.1 ml
Standard Deviation 29.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.
Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=16 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
LVEF - Change From Baseline
|
2.49 percentage of blood volume
Standard Error 7.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.
Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=18 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
LVEF - Change From Baseline
|
0.37 percentage of blood volume
Standard Deviation 7.19
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.
Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=22 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline
|
-1.15 l/min
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.
Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=20 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline
|
-0.50 l/min
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.
Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=22 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline
|
-0.60 l/min/m^2
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.
Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=20 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline
|
-0.26 l/min/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
Adverse Events
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 participants at risk
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
angina pectoris
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Cardiac disorders
aortic insufficiency
|
10.2%
5/49 • Number of events 5 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Cardiac disorders
arrhythmia
|
8.2%
4/49 • Number of events 5 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Cardiac disorders
cardiac decompensation
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Cardiac disorders
pericardial effusion
|
8.2%
4/49 • Number of events 4 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Cardiac disorders
syncope
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
GI bleeding
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
reflux esophagitis
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Infections and infestations
endocarditis
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Infections and infestations
systemic inflammatory response syndrome
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Infections and infestations
worsening of wound healing disorder
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Infections and infestations
wound infection
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
bleeding
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
loosening of wire cerclages
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
presternal abscess
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
lumbago
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
renal failure
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
bronchopulmonary infection
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pleural effusion
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pleuropneumonia
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pneumonia
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pneumothorax
|
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pulmonary spasticity
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 participants at risk
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
anemia
|
10.2%
5/49 • Number of events 5 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Cardiac disorders
aortic insufficiency
|
14.3%
7/49 • Number of events 7 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Cardiac disorders
arrhythmia
|
40.8%
20/49 • Number of events 23 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Cardiac disorders
edema
|
10.2%
5/49 • Number of events 5 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Cardiac disorders
pericardial effusion
|
14.3%
7/49 • Number of events 7 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Cardiac disorders
syncope
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 3 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Endocrine disorders
abnormal LDH value
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Endocrine disorders
hyperthyreosis
|
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Infections and infestations
increased C-reactive protein
|
12.2%
6/49 • Number of events 6 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
bleeding event
|
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
sternal pain
|
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
thoracic pain
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
atelectasis
|
8.2%
4/49 • Number of events 4 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pleural effusion
|
28.6%
14/49 • Number of events 14 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pneumothorax
|
12.2%
6/49 • Number of events 6 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
respiratory infection
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Publication by the investigator was not allowed until completion of the trial. All proposed publications must be cleared by unanimous vote of a publication committee consisting of the sponsor and representatives of the study investigators. Publication materials must be submitted for review at least 60 day in advance of publication. The Sponsor may embargo publication for 60 additional days to allow for patent filing or may prevent publication if filling of such application would be premature.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER