Trial Outcomes & Findings for The HAART 300 Annuloplasty Ring Trial Extended Safety and Performance (NCT NCT01732835)

NCT ID: NCT01732835

Last Updated: 2017-03-10

Results Overview

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

68 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 months

Results posted on

2017-03-10

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
6-month Primary Endpoint
STARTED
68
6-month Primary Endpoint
COMPLETED
44
6-month Primary Endpoint
NOT COMPLETED
24
2-year Extended Follow-up
STARTED
44
2-year Extended Follow-up
COMPLETED
39
2-year Extended Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
5

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
6-month Primary Endpoint
Did not receive device
19
6-month Primary Endpoint
Withdrawal by Subject
2
6-month Primary Endpoint
Adverse Event
3
2-year Extended Follow-up
Withdrawal by Subject
1
2-year Extended Follow-up
Adverse Event
3
2-year Extended Follow-up
Death
1

Baseline Characteristics

Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity
I
11 participants
n=49 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity
II
25 participants
n=49 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity
III
13 participants
n=49 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity
IV
0 participants
n=49 Participants
Peak gradient
11.1 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 • n=43 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
Mean gradient
5.5 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=43 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
Left ventricular (LV) mass
244.1 g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 85.2 • n=39 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
Left ventricular internal dimension (LVID) diastole
5.50 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.86 • n=40 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
LVID systole
4.02 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.83 • n=35 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
LV diastolic volume
155.3 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 63.3 • n=27 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
LV systolic volume
76.5 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.7 • n=28 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
54.2 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=27 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
Cardiac output
6.20 l/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.17 • n=32 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
Cardiac index
3.16 l/min/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.11 • n=32 Participants • Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=49 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
24 Participants
n=49 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
25 Participants
n=49 Participants
Age, Continuous
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
n=49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants
n=49 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
5 participants
n=49 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
44 participants
n=49 Participants
Aortic Insufficiency
0
0 participants
n=49 Participants
Aortic Insufficiency
1+
3 participants
n=49 Participants
Aortic Insufficiency
2+
10 participants
n=49 Participants
Aortic Insufficiency
3+
18 participants
n=49 Participants
Aortic Insufficiency
4+
12 participants
n=49 Participants
Aortic Insufficiency
Not evaluable
6 participants
n=49 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 6 Months Postprocedure
100 percentage of participants
Interval 92.8 to 100.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.

Assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=41 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months
0
11 participants
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months
1+
21 participants
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months
2+
7 participants
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months
3+
2 participants
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months
4+
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: discharge or 14 days postprocedure, whichever comes first

Success is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge or 14 days after the procedure: - Aortic annular dissection, rupture, or leaflet damage - Mitral valve impingement due to implant - implant dehiscence/migration into aorta - implant dehiscence/migration into left ventricle - Hemodynamics requiring intervention - Other adverse event resulting in reoperation, explantation, or permanent disability.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Implant Procedure Success
95.9 percentage of implant procedures
Interval 86.0 to 99.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events at 6 months postprocedure: - Device-related mortality - Complete heart block - Structural device failure - Endocarditis - Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence - Thromboembolism - Bleeding Event - Native Valve Deterioration - Valve Thrombosis - Hemolysis - Reoperation and explant at 6 months

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events
89.6 percentage of participants
Interval 80.9 to 98.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 2 Years Postprocedure
97.6 percentage of participants
Interval 83.9 to 99.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.

Assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=37 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years
0
2 participants
Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years
1+
25 participants
Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years
2+
10 participants
Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years
3+
0 participants
Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years
4+
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: Participants with an evaluation of this measure.

Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=43 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 6 Months
I
30 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 6 Months
II
13 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 6 Months
III
0 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 6 Months
IV
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: Participants with an evaluation of this measure.

Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=38 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 2 Years
I
28 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 2 Years
II
9 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 2 Years
III
1 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 2 Years
IV
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=36 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline
5.3 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 6.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=34 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline
5.9 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 10.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=36 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline
2.6 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 3.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=34 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline
3.1 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 5.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=29 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
LV Mass - Change From Baseline
-26.5 g
Standard Deviation 60.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=24 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
LV Mass - Change From Baseline
-27.4 g
Standard Deviation 60.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=30 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
LVID Diastole - Change From Baseline
-0.48 cm
Standard Deviation 0.71

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=24 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
LVID Diastole - Change From Baseline
-0.22 cm
Standard Deviation 0.65

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=25 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
LVID Systole - Change From Baseline
-0.48 cm
Standard Deviation 0.71

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=17 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
LVID Systole - Change From Baseline
-0.22 cm
Standard Deviation 0.84

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=16 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline
-21.8 ml
Standard Deviation 49.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=18 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline
-19.9 ml
Standard Deviation 53.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=17 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline
-17.5 ml
Standard Deviation 30.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=19 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline
-11.1 ml
Standard Deviation 29.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=16 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
LVEF - Change From Baseline
2.49 percentage of blood volume
Standard Error 7.65

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=18 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
LVEF - Change From Baseline
0.37 percentage of blood volume
Standard Deviation 7.19

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=22 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline
-1.15 l/min
Standard Deviation 1.66

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=20 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline
-0.50 l/min
Standard Deviation 2.20

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=22 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline
-0.60 l/min/m^2
Standard Deviation 0.85

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=20 Participants
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline
-0.26 l/min/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.07

Adverse Events

HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device

Serious events: 23 serious events
Other events: 38 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 participants at risk
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Cardiac disorders
angina pectoris
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Cardiac disorders
aortic insufficiency
10.2%
5/49 • Number of events 5 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Cardiac disorders
arrhythmia
8.2%
4/49 • Number of events 5 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Cardiac disorders
cardiac decompensation
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Cardiac disorders
pericardial effusion
8.2%
4/49 • Number of events 4 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Cardiac disorders
syncope
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Gastrointestinal disorders
GI bleeding
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Gastrointestinal disorders
reflux esophagitis
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Infections and infestations
endocarditis
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Infections and infestations
systemic inflammatory response syndrome
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Infections and infestations
worsening of wound healing disorder
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Infections and infestations
wound infection
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
bleeding
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
loosening of wire cerclages
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
presternal abscess
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
lumbago
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Renal and urinary disorders
renal failure
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
bronchopulmonary infection
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pleural effusion
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pleuropneumonia
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pneumonia
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pneumothorax
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pulmonary spasticity
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
n=49 participants at risk
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
anemia
10.2%
5/49 • Number of events 5 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Cardiac disorders
aortic insufficiency
14.3%
7/49 • Number of events 7 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Cardiac disorders
arrhythmia
40.8%
20/49 • Number of events 23 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Cardiac disorders
edema
10.2%
5/49 • Number of events 5 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Cardiac disorders
pericardial effusion
14.3%
7/49 • Number of events 7 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Cardiac disorders
syncope
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 3 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Endocrine disorders
abnormal LDH value
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Endocrine disorders
hyperthyreosis
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Infections and infestations
increased C-reactive protein
12.2%
6/49 • Number of events 6 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
bleeding event
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
sternal pain
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
thoracic pain
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
atelectasis
8.2%
4/49 • Number of events 4 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pleural effusion
28.6%
14/49 • Number of events 14 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pneumothorax
12.2%
6/49 • Number of events 6 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
respiratory infection
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Through 2 years for the 49 participants receiving the implant

Additional Information

John Wheeler

Biostable Science and Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 512-386-1996

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Publication by the investigator was not allowed until completion of the trial. All proposed publications must be cleared by unanimous vote of a publication committee consisting of the sponsor and representatives of the study investigators. Publication materials must be submitted for review at least 60 day in advance of publication. The Sponsor may embargo publication for 60 additional days to allow for patent filing or may prevent publication if filling of such application would be premature.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER