A Study of Participant Preference With Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous MabThera/Rituxan in Participants With CD20+ Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma or CD20+ Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Grades 1, 2 or 3a

NCT ID: NCT01724021

Last Updated: 2018-01-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

743 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-12-31

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This multi-center, open-label, randomized study will evaluate the participant preference with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of MabThera/Rituxan (rituximab) in participants with CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or CD20+ follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In Arm A, participants will receive MabThera/Rituxan 375 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and MabThera/Rituxan 1400 mg subcutaneously (SC) on Day 1 of Cycles 2-4, followed by MabThera/Rituxan IV in Cycles 5-8. Participants in Arm B will receive MabThera/Rituxan IV in Cycles 1-4 and SC in Cycles 5-8. All participants will receive 6-8 cycles of standard chemotherapy (according to local country practice) with 8 cycles of MabThera/Rituxan. Anticipated time on study treatment is up to 24 weeks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A

Participants in Arm A received one cycle of rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV), then three cycles of rituximab 1400mg subcutaneously (SC), followed by four cycles of rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV in combination with a standard chemotherapy of cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, Oncovin, prednisone/prednisolone (CHOP), cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone/prednisolone (CVP), or bendamustine. Rituximab was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle followed by administration of the preselected chemotherapy. Cycles were repeated every 14, 21, or 28 days, depending on the combination chemotherapy regimen selected by the investigator.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin, Oncovin, Prednisone/Prednisolone (CHOP)

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard chemotherapy

Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone/Prednisolone (CVP)

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard chemotherapy

Bendamustine

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard chemotherapy

Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

1400 mg subcutaneously (SC), Day 1 Cycles 2-4

Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

375 mg/m2 intravenously (IV), Day 1 Cycles 1 and 4-8

Arm B

Participants in Arm B received four cycles of rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV followed by four cycles of rituximab 1400mg SC in combination with a standard chemotherapy of CHOP, CVP, or bendamustine. Rituximab was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle followed by administration of the preselected chemotherapy. Cycles were repeated every 14, 21, or 28 days, depending on the combination chemotherapy regimen selected by the investigator.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin, Oncovin, Prednisone/Prednisolone (CHOP)

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard chemotherapy

Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone/Prednisolone (CVP)

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard chemotherapy

Bendamustine

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard chemotherapy

Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

375 mg/m2 IV, Day 1 Cycles 1-4

Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

1400 mg SC, Day 1 Cycles 5-8

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin, Oncovin, Prednisone/Prednisolone (CHOP)

Standard chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone/Prednisolone (CVP)

Standard chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Bendamustine

Standard chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Rituximab

1400 mg subcutaneously (SC), Day 1 Cycles 2-4

Intervention Type DRUG

Rituximab

375 mg/m2 IV, Day 1 Cycles 1-4

Intervention Type DRUG

Rituximab

375 mg/m2 intravenously (IV), Day 1 Cycles 1 and 4-8

Intervention Type DRUG

Rituximab

1400 mg SC, Day 1 Cycles 5-8

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Treanda Rituxan MabThera Rituxan MabThera Rituxan MabThera Rituxan MabThera

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult participants , \>/= 18 and \</= 80 years of age
* Histologically confirmed, previously untreated CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or CD20+ follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) Grade 1, 2, or 3a, according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification
* An International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of 1-4 or IPI score of 0 with bulky disease, defined as one lesion \>/= 7.5 cm, or Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI; low, intermediate or high risk)
* At least one bi-dimensionally measurable lesion defined as \>/=1.5 cm in its largest dimension on CT scan
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status \</= 3

Exclusion Criteria

* Transformed lymphoma or follicular lymphoma IIIB
* Primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, histologic evidence of transformation to Burkitt lymphoma, primary mediastinal DLBCL, primary effusion lymphoma, primary cutaneous DLBCL, or primary DLBCL of the testis
* History of other malignancy that could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of the results; this includes a malignancy that has been treated but not with curative intent, unless the malignancy has been in remission for \>/= 5 years prior to enrolment; participants with a history of curatively treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma or melanoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix are eligible
* Prior therapy for DLBCL or NHL, with the exception of nodal biopsy or local irradiation
* Prior treatment with cytotoxic drugs (with the exclusion of intrathecal methotrexate for CNS prophylaxis in DLBCL) or rituximab for another condition, or prior use of an anti-CD20 drug
* Prior use of monoclonal antibody within 3 months prior to randomization
* Chemotherapy or other investigational therapy within 28 days prior to randomization
* Ongoing corticosteroid use \> 30 mg/day prednisolone or equivalent
* Inadequate renal. hematologic or hepatic function
* Active and/or severe infection or any major episode of infection within 4 weeks prior to randomization
* Active hepatitis B virus or active hepatitis C virus infection
* History of human immunodeficiency (HIV) seropositive status
* A positive pregnancy test in women of childbearing potential
* Life expectancy of less than 6 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Corrientes, , Argentina

Site Status

Santa Fé, , Argentina

Site Status

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Site Status

Geelong, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Malvern, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Wodonga, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Krems, , Austria

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Steyr, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Varginha, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Londrina, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Site Status

Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Novo Hamburgo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Viña del Mar, , Chile

Site Status

Montería, , Colombia

Site Status

Osijek, , Croatia

Site Status

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Holstebro, , Denmark

Site Status

Santiago de los Caballeros, , Dominican Republic

Site Status

Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

San Salvador, , El Salvador

Site Status

Aschaffenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Augsburg, , Germany

Site Status

Bamberg, , Germany

Site Status

Bayreuth, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Bottrop, , Germany

Site Status

Brandenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Bremen, , Germany

Site Status

Bremerhaven, , Germany

Site Status

Coesfeld, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Darmstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Darmstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Eisenach, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt (Oder), , Germany

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Fürth, , Germany

Site Status

Georgsmarienhütte, , Germany

Site Status

Giessen, , Germany

Site Status

Giessen, , Germany

Site Status

Goslar, , Germany

Site Status

Gütersloh, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hamm, , Germany

Site Status

Hamm, , Germany

Site Status

Hanau, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Herford, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Kaiserslautern, , Germany

Site Status

Kassel, , Germany

Site Status

Leer, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Limburg, , Germany

Site Status

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mayen, , Germany

Site Status

Moers, , Germany

Site Status

Mönchengladbach, , Germany

Site Status

Mutlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Mülheim, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Neunkirchen/Saar, , Germany

Site Status

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Oldenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Osnabrück, , Germany

Site Status

Paderborn, , Germany

Site Status

Pforzheim, , Germany

Site Status

Pinneberg, , Germany

Site Status

Pirna, , Germany

Site Status

Porta Westfalica, , Germany

Site Status

Pößneck, , Germany

Site Status

Ravensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Recklinghausen, , Germany

Site Status

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Rötha, , Germany

Site Status

Schwäbisch Hall, , Germany

Site Status

Schweinfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Siegburg, , Germany

Site Status

Stade, , Germany

Site Status

Stendal, , Germany

Site Status

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Traunstein, , Germany

Site Status

Trier, , Germany

Site Status

Velbert, , Germany

Site Status

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Weilheim, , Germany

Site Status

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Wilhelmshaven, , Germany

Site Status

Witten, , Germany

Site Status

Würselen, , Germany

Site Status

Zittau, , Germany

Site Status

Zwickau, , Germany

Site Status

Guatemala City, , Guatemala

Site Status

Guatemala City, , Guatemala

Site Status

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Bandung, , Indonesia

Site Status

Jakarta, , Indonesia

Site Status

Surabaya, , Indonesia

Site Status

Yogyakarta, , Indonesia

Site Status

Brindisi, Apulia, Italy

Site Status

Lecce, Apulia, Italy

Site Status

Catanzaro, Calabria, Italy

Site Status

Ferrara, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Parma, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Piacenza, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Rome, Lazio, Italy

Site Status

Candiolo, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Cuneo, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Palermo, Sicily, Italy

Site Status

Lido di Camaiore, Tuscany, Italy

Site Status

Livorno, Tuscany, Italy

Site Status

Ampang, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuching, , Malaysia

Site Status

Sabak Bernam, , Malaysia

Site Status

Amstelveen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Apeldoorn, , Netherlands

Site Status

Beverwijk, , Netherlands

Site Status

Capelle aan den IJssel, , Netherlands

Site Status

Delftzijl, , Netherlands

Site Status

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Goes, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leidschendam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status

Tilburg, , Netherlands

Site Status

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Panama City, , Panama

Site Status

Panama City, , Panama

Site Status

Panama City, , Panama

Site Status

Arequipa, , Peru

Site Status

Cusco, , Peru

Site Status

La Victoria, Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Cebu City, , Philippines

Site Status

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Quezon City, , Philippines

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Matosinhos Municipality, , Portugal

Site Status

Ponta Delgada, , Portugal

Site Status

Setúbal, , Portugal

Site Status

Viseu, , Portugal

Site Status

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Sibiu, , Romania

Site Status

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Falun, , Sweden

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Jönköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Karlstad, , Sweden

Site Status

Sundsvall, , Sweden

Site Status

Västerås, , Sweden

Site Status

Kaohsung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Khon Kaen, , Thailand

Site Status

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Denizli, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Erzurum, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Malatya, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Hà Nội, , Vietnam

Site Status

Hochiminh City, , Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina Australia Austria Brazil Canada Chile Colombia Croatia Denmark Dominican Republic Egypt El Salvador Germany Guatemala Hong Kong Hungary Indonesia Italy Malaysia Netherlands New Zealand Panama Peru Philippines Portugal Romania South Korea Sweden Taiwan Thailand Turkey (Türkiye) Vietnam

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rummel M, Kim TM, Aversa F, Brugger W, Capochiani E, Plenteda C, Re F, Trask P, Osborne S, Smith R, Grigg A. Preference for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of rituximab among patients with untreated CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or follicular lymphoma: results from a prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover study (PrefMab). Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):836-842. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw685.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28031173 (View on PubMed)

Theodore-Oklota C, Humphrey L, Wiesner C, Schnetzler G, Hudgens S, Campbell A. Validation of a treatment satisfaction questionnaire in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: assessing the change from intravenous to subcutaneous administration of rituximab. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Sep 13;10:1767-1776. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S108489. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27695295 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-003230-17

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MO28457

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Primary Rituximab and Maintenance
NCT00140582 COMPLETED PHASE3