Trial Outcomes & Findings for Dose-Optimization, Adjunctive Treatment Study of Ezogabine/Retigabine Immediate Release in Partial-onset Seizures (NCT NCT01721317)
NCT ID: NCT01721317
Last Updated: 2020-12-30
Results Overview
The efficacy of ezogabine/retigabine IR as an adjunctive treatment was to be evaluated by the percent change in the total partial seizure frequency, which was recorded by participants in the daily seizure calendar. The total 28-day POS rate is defined as the total number of POS reported during the evaluation period divided by the total number of applicable days during the evaluation period with this quotient multiplied by 28 days. The applicable days are the days in which the participant had non-missing seizure data (i.e., either 0 or \> 0 seizures recorded). Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
6 participants
Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase) through Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase)
2020-12-30
Participant Flow
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study comparing ezogabine/retigabine immediate release (IR) with placebo, as adjunctive treatment in adults with partial-onset seizures. The study was prematurely discontinued after randomizing only 6 of the planned 208 participants.
The study consisted of a 2-week (or less) Screening Phase, an 8-week Baseline Phase, a 2-week Titration Phase, an 8-week Dose-Optimization Phase, an 8-week Maintenance Phase, and a 3-week Taper Phase.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received matching ezogabine/retigabine IR placebo orally three times a day (TID) in equally or unequally divided doses.
|
Ezogabine/Retigabine IR
Participants received investigator-selected daily doses of 600 milligrams (mg)/day, 750 mg/day, 900 mg/day, 1050 mg/day or 1200 mg/day of ezogabine/retigabine IR. The study drug was taken orally TID in equally or unequally divided doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
2
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received matching ezogabine/retigabine IR placebo orally three times a day (TID) in equally or unequally divided doses.
|
Ezogabine/Retigabine IR
Participants received investigator-selected daily doses of 600 milligrams (mg)/day, 750 mg/day, 900 mg/day, 1050 mg/day or 1200 mg/day of ezogabine/retigabine IR. The study drug was taken orally TID in equally or unequally divided doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Study Closed / Terminated
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Dose-Optimization, Adjunctive Treatment Study of Ezogabine/Retigabine Immediate Release in Partial-onset Seizures
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=2 Participants
Participants received matching ezogabine/retigabine IR placebo orally TID in equally or unequally divided doses.
|
Ezogabine/Retigabine IR
n=4 Participants
Participants received investigator-selected daily doses of 600 mg/day, 750 mg/day, 900 mg/day, 1050 mg/day or 1200 mg/day of ezogabine/retigabine IR. The study drug was taken orally TID in equally or unequally divided doses.
|
Total
n=6 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
42.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.61 • n=5 Participants
|
42.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.32 • n=7 Participants
|
42.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.50 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase) through Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase)Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants who received \>= 1 dose of study medication and who had \>= 1 post-Baseline seizure diary day with \>= 0 seizures recorded.
The efficacy of ezogabine/retigabine IR as an adjunctive treatment was to be evaluated by the percent change in the total partial seizure frequency, which was recorded by participants in the daily seizure calendar. The total 28-day POS rate is defined as the total number of POS reported during the evaluation period divided by the total number of applicable days during the evaluation period with this quotient multiplied by 28 days. The applicable days are the days in which the participant had non-missing seizure data (i.e., either 0 or \> 0 seizures recorded). Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase) through Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase)Population: ITT Population
The percent change in 28-day total POS frequency within each stratum (sodium channel blocker or non-sodium channel blocker) background antiepileptic drug (AED) was to be summarized as the supportive analysis. The total 28-day POS value is defined as the total number of POS reported during the evaluation period divided by the total number of applicable days during the evaluation period with this quotient multiplied by 28 days. The applicable days are the days in which the participant had non-missing seizure data (i.e., either 0 or \> 0 seizures recorded). Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 3 (start of Dose -Optimization Phase) to Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase)Population: ITT Population
The efficacy of ezogabine/retigabine IR as an adjunctive treatment was to be evaluated by the percent change in total partial seizure frequency during the Dose-Optimization Phase and Maintenance Phase. The total 28-day POS value is defined as the total number of POS reported during the evaluation period divided by the total number of applicable days during the evaluation period with this quotient multiplied by 28 days. The applicable days are the days in which the participant had non-missing seizure data (i.e., either 0 or \> 0 seizures recorded). Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase) through Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase)Population: ITT Population
Participants (par.) experiencing \>= 50% reduction from Baseline to the end of the Double-Blind Phase in 28-day total POS were to be reported. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 3 (start of Dose-Optimization Phase) to Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase)Population: ITT Population
Participants without seizures during the interval of Maintenance Phase and the Dose-Optimization Phase + Maintenance Phase were to be reported. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase) to Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase)Population: ITT Population
The change in number of seizure free days during the Double-Blind period, the Maintenance Phase and the Dose-Optimization Phase + Maintenance Phase were to be reported. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 3 (start of Dose -Optimization Phase) to Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase)Population: ITT Population
The effect of ezogabine/retigabine IR as an adjunctive treatment on health outcomes was to be evaluated on the basis of functional status and productivity. Participants were asked to complete the paper functional status diary to collect information to assess how the participant's functional status is affected by their epilepsy symptoms. Participants were asked to rate their epilepsy-related worry, activity limitations, and productivity (missed work or school). Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase) to Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population: all randomized participants who receive \>= 1 dose of study medication.
The safety and tolerability of ezogabine/retigabine IR was to be evaluated by recording the incidence of new seizure types in participants without a history of these seizure types. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 11 (start of Maintenance Phase) to Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase)Population: Safety Population
The safety and tolerability of ezogabine/retigabine IR was to be evaluated by recording the number of participants at each dose during the Maintenance Phase and the average maintenance dose over all participants. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase) to Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The safety and tolerability of ezogabine/retigabine IR was to be evaluated by recording the incidence of participants with early study discontinuation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=2 Participants
Participants received matching ezogabine/retigabine IR placebo orally TID in equally or unequally divided doses.
|
Ezogabine/Retigabine IR
n=4 Participants
Participants received investigator-selected daily doses of 600 mg/day, 750 mg/day, 900 mg/day, 1050 mg/day or 1200 mg/day of ezogabine/retigabine IR. The study drug was taken orally TID in equally or unequally divided doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Early Study Discontinuation
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 2 (end of Titration Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
Change from Baseline in body weight was to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 2 (end of Titration Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
Change from Baseline in blood pressure was to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 2 (end of Titration Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
Change from Baseline in heart rate was to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 2 (end of Titration Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
Change from Baseline in the QT interval using Bazett's correction (QTcB) and QT interval using Fridericia's correction were to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated hematology tests were to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated hematology tests were to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated hematology tests were to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated hematology test was to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated hematology test was to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated hematology test was to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated chemistry tests were to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated chemistry tests were to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated chemistry tests were to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated chemistry tests were to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated chemistry tests was to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated chemistry test was to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated urinalysis test was to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the indicated urinalysis test was to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize ot evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase), Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase) and Week 21 (end of Taper Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the following urinalysis parameters (urine occult blood, urine glucose, urine ketones and urine protein) were to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 10 (end of Dose-Optimization Phase) and Week 18 (end of Maintenance Phase)Population: Safety Population
The change from Baseline in the PVR bladder ultrasound results was to be assessed. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to summarize or evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (end of Baseline Phase), Week 2 (end of Titration Phase), Week 4, Week 6 and Week 8Population: Safety Population
Prospective assessment of suicidality was conducted using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), a brief questionnaire designed to assess severity and change in suicidality by integrating both behavior and ideation using a semi-structured interview to probe participant responses. C-SSRS data were only collected through Week 8 for the 6 randomized participants. Due to the study being prematurely terminated, there was not sufficient data to evaluate this endpoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=2 Participants
Participants received matching ezogabine/retigabine IR placebo orally TID in equally or unequally divided doses.
|
Ezogabine/Retigabine IR
n=4 Participants
Participants received investigator-selected daily doses of 600 mg/day, 750 mg/day, 900 mg/day, 1050 mg/day or 1200 mg/day of ezogabine/retigabine IR. The study drug was taken orally TID in equally or unequally divided doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Assessment Events of Suicidal Behavior, Suicidal Ideation or Non-suicidal Self Injurious Behavior Via the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Ezogabine/Retigabine IR
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Participants received matching ezogabine/retigabine IR placebo orally TID in equally or unequally divided doses.
|
Ezogabine/Retigabine IR
n=4 participants at risk
Participants received investigator-selected daily doses of 600 mg/day, 750 mg/day, 900 mg/day, 1050 mg/day or 1200 mg/day of ezogabine/retigabine IR. The study drug was taken orally TID in equally or unequally divided doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
50.0%
1/2 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of the investigational product until the Follow-up period (up to Study Day 147).
SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for members of the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of the investigational product until the Follow-up period (up to Study Day 147).
SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for members of the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
50.0%
1/2 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of the investigational product until the Follow-up period (up to Study Day 147).
SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for members of the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of the investigational product until the Follow-up period (up to Study Day 147).
SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for members of the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
50.0%
1/2 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of the investigational product until the Follow-up period (up to Study Day 147).
SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for members of the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of the investigational product until the Follow-up period (up to Study Day 147).
SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for members of the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER