Comparison of Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Lidocaine Spray for Hysteroscopy
NCT ID: NCT01718314
Last Updated: 2012-10-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
138 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-03-31
2010-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study, we aim to compare the effectiveness of sublingual misoprostol versus lidocaine pump spray for pain relief during office hysteroscopy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sublingual Misoprostol & Lidocaine placebo
Misoprostol 200 µg sublingually single dose and Lidocaine spray placebo
Sublingual Misoprostol
Placebo (for Lidocaine)
The pharmacy-produced sterile saline containing pump spray external characteristics identical to lidocaine pump spray
Lidocaine Pump Spray & Misoprostol placebo
Lidocaine Pump spray, 6 sprays to cervix (60 mg totally) and sublingual misoprotol placebo
Lidocaine pump spray
Placebo (for Misoprostol)
Lactose filler, the pharmacy-produced pills identical to original misoprostol pill
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sublingual Misoprostol
Lidocaine pump spray
Placebo (for Misoprostol)
Lactose filler, the pharmacy-produced pills identical to original misoprostol pill
Placebo (for Lidocaine)
The pharmacy-produced sterile saline containing pump spray external characteristics identical to lidocaine pump spray
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* known sensitivity to lidocaine (amide group local anesthetics) or prostaglandins
* epilepsy
* significantly impaired respiratory or cardiac conduction functions
* hypertension
* glaucoma
* renal failure
* acute liver disease
* uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
* pregnancy or suspicion of pregnancy
* pelvic inflammatory disease
* cervical operation history
* vaginismus.
18 Years
51 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr. Sami Ulus Children's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sertac ESIN
Obstetrician and Gynecologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tuncay Kucukozkan, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Sami Ulus Maternity and Childrens Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dr Sami Ulus Maternity and Children Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
van Dongen H, de Kroon CD, Jacobi CE, Trimbos JB, Jansen FW. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2007 Jun;114(6):664-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01326.x.
De Iaco P, Marabini A, Stefanetti M, Del Vecchio C, Bovicelli L. Acceptability and pain of outpatient hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000 Feb;7(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(00)80012-2.
Mulayim B, Celik NY, Onalan G, Bagis T, Zeyneloglu HB. Sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening before diagnostic hysteroscopy in premenopausal women: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2010 May 1;93(7):2400-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.073. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HEK 11/33-21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id