Comparison of Aliskiren vs Negative Controls on Aortic Stiffness in Patients With MFS
NCT ID: NCT01715207
Last Updated: 2017-06-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-06-30
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Transforming growth factor beta(TGF-beta) mediates disease pathogenesis in MFS and contributes to aortic stiffness. Cross-talk between TGF-beta system and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been demonstrated. The angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), losartan, inhibits TGF-beta activity and reverses aortic wall pathology in a Marfan mouse model. In a small cohort study, the use of ARB therapy (losartan or irbesartan) significantly slowed the rate of progressive aortic dilatation in patients with MFS, after BB therapy had failed to prevent aortic root dilatation. In another study, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, perindopril, reduced both aortic stiffness and aortic root diameter in patients with MFS taking standard BB therapy. Renin inhibitor, aliskiren, has not been studied to reduce aortic stiffness and attenuate aortic dilatation in patients with MFS.
This trial is a randomized, open-label trial of 32 patients with Marfan syndrome, treated with 6 months of aliskiren vs. negative controls in patients with MFS under atenolol treatment. MRI for aortic pulsed wave velocity (PWV) and distensibility, measurements of central BP (CBP) and augmentation index (AIx) will be performed at the beginning and end of treatment. A blood drawn for serum markers of TGF-beta, extracellular matrix turnover and inflammation will also be performed at 0 and 6 months. We plan to determine whether aliskiren decreases aortic stiffness significantly more than negative controls in patients with MFS under atenolol treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Losartan Versus Atenolol on Aortic and Cardiac Muscle Stiffness in Adults With Marfan Syndrome
NCT00723801
Atenolol Versus Losartan in the Prevention of Progressive Dilation of the Aorta in Marfan Syndrome
NCT01145612
Losartan Versus Atenolol for the Treatment of Marfan Syndrome
NCT00593710
Comparison of Medical Therapies in Marfan Syndrome.
NCT01295047
A Randomized, Open-label, LOSARTAN Therapy on the Progression of Aortic Root Dilation in Patients With Marfan Syndrome
NCT00651235
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
MFS patients were recruited at Samsung Medical Center from November 2009 to October 2014. All patients were receiving atenolol as standard β-blocker therapy. All patients gave written informed consent to participate in the study, which was approved by the Samsung Medical Center Ethics Committee. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov. (Identifier: NCT01715207) Inclusion criteria were age 14 to 55 years, a diagnosis of MFS by Ghent criteria, β-blocker treatment for at least 3 months, and no chronic RAS inhibitor therapy (i.e., angiotensin II receptor blockers or ACE inhibitors) for 90 days prior to screening. Exclusion criteria were previous medical history of aortic surgery and/or dissection, significant valve disease requiring surgery, aortic root dimension \> 5.0 cm, renal dysfunction (creatinine \> upper normal limit), pregnancy or planned pregnancy within 12 months of study entry or current breast feeding, known renal artery stenosis, hypersensitivity to aliskiren or any of the excipients, elevation of serum creatinine during follow-up (\> 30% of baseline), diarrhea resulting in severe dehydration, development of gout or ureter stone, symptomatic hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg with symptoms), hyperkalemia, and concomitant treatment with cyclosporin A.
Follow-up and outcomes All included patients were clinically followed to monitor adverse effects of angioedema, gastrointestinal symptoms, rash, gout, hypotension, and renal stone at initial examination, 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 24 weeks. The following laboratory data were collected during the same period: potassium, electrocardiogram, creatinine, uric acid, and urine analysis. Echocardiographic evaluation, peripheral tonometric measurements of peripheral PWV, central aortic blood pressure and augmentation index, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cardiac MRI), and biomarkers were analyzed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment.
Safety information was collected, including all adverse events and all serious adverse events. Completion of a serious adverse event form was required for all serious adverse events that occurred during the study period. All serious adverse events were assessed by investigators and reported to the Novartis safety desk within 24 hours.
The primary end point was central aortic distensibility by cardiac MRI at 24 weeks, reported as the change over the 24-week period after randomization. The secondary end points were central aortic PWV by cardiac MRI, change in central aortic blood pressure (hereafter, aortic BP), augmentation index, peripheral PWV by tonometry, aortic root diameter by echocardiography, severity of aortic regurgitation by echocardiography, and dissection/rupture/operation of aneurysm.
Cardiovascular imaging - echocardiography and cardiac MRI Cardiac MRI Cardiac MRI was performed using a 1.5-Tesla scanner (Magnetom Avanto, Syngo MR; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Aortic diameters were measured at four landmark levels: level 1, the ascending aorta at the level of bifurcation of the pulmonary artery; level 2, the upper descending thoracic aorta at the level of bifurcation of the pulmonary artery; level 3, the lower descending thoracic aorta at the level of the diaphragm; level 4, the abdominal aorta just above the iliac bifurcation. Cine imaging was also performed at the same levels to measure aortic stiffness.
Cardiac MRI analysis - central aortic distensibility and central aortic PWV Analyses of the MRIs were performed using commercial software (Argus version 4.02, Siemens Medical Systems, Germany) by experienced observers who were blinded to patient information. To measure central aortic distensibility, the systolic and diastolic cross-sectional areas were measured by manual contouring of the aorta through the cardiac cycle on the cine image. Distensibility at the four regions was calculated as the mean of values obtained from the following equation: Distensibility = (Amax - Amin)/\[Amin × (Pmax - Pmin)\](10-3mm/Hg), where Amax is the maximal (systolic) aortic area, Amin is the minimal (diastolic) aortic area, Pmax is the systolic blood pressure (SBP), and Pmin is the diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Central aortic blood pressure measured non-invasively by SphygmoCor was used for systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
Aortic PWV was measured according to the well-validated method using MRI 19. From the velocity-encoded MRIs, aortic contours were automatically detected and manually adjusted in each slice area throughout the cardiac cycle. The transit time between the flow curves of each region of the aorta was determined from the midpoint of the systolic up-slope on the flow versus time curve 26-28. The up-slopes were identified by drawing a line between the points of 40% and 60% maximum velocity on the waveform. The distance between each aortic level was measured on black blood images using a curved line along the center of the aorta. Based on these data, the regional PWV was calculated as the ratio of the distance between levels and the time differences between the arrival of the pulse wave at each level. The PWV was measured at two regions: the proximal aorta (proximal PWV between level 1 and level 2) and the entire aorta (PWV-total between level 1 and level 4).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Atenolol & Aliskiren
Atenolol tablet and Aliskiren 150mg or 300mg tablet by mouth per day for 6month
Aliskiren
Atenolol
Atenolol
Atenolol tablet(Negative controls, Open-label)
Atenolol
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Aliskiren
Atenolol
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age between 14 and 55 years
3. Beta-blocker treatment at least 3 months
4. subjects must not have been receiving chronic RAS inhibitor therapy (i.e. ARBs, or ACE inhibitors)\>= 90days prior to screening
5. Written informed consent from the patients or authorized representatives must be obtained
Exclusion Criteria
2. significant valve disease requiring surgery
3. aortic root dimension \> 5.5 cm
4. renal dysfunction (creatinine \> upper normal limit)
5. pregnancy or planned pregnancy within 12 months of study entry or breast feeding women
6. Known renal artery stenosis
7. Hypersensitivity to the aliskiren or to any of the excipients
8. Elevation of serum creatinine during follow-up (\> 30% than baseline)
9. Diarrhea, resulting severe dehydration
10. Development of gout or ureter stone
11. Symptomatic hypotension (SBP\<90 with symptom)
12. Hyperkalemia
13. Concomitant use with ciclosporin A
14 Years
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samsung Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Duk-Kyung Kim
PhD, MD, Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Duk-Kyung Kim, PhD MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Samsung Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-10-025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.