Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study Of CP-690,550 In Stable Kidney Transplant Patients (NCT NCT01710033)
NCT ID: NCT01710033
Last Updated: 2012-12-26
Results Overview
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast).
COMPLETED
PHASE1
28 participants
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1
2012-12-26
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo, Stage 1
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (mycophenolate mofetil \[MMF\] with or without calcineurin inhibitor \[cyclosporine {CsA} or tacrolimus {TAC}\]) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Stage 1
STARTED
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
0
|
|
Stage 1
COMPLETED
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
0
|
|
Stage 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Stage 2
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
|
Stage 2
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
|
Stage 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo, Stage 1
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (mycophenolate mofetil \[MMF\] with or without calcineurin inhibitor \[cyclosporine {CsA} or tacrolimus {TAC}\]) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Stage 2
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study Of CP-690,550 In Stable Kidney Transplant Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) with or without calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=10 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
Total
n=28 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
54.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.0 • n=5 Participants
|
53.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5 • n=7 Participants
|
46.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8 • n=5 Participants
|
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=4 Participants
|
52.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.0 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=8 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) For CP-690,550
|
183 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 75.3
|
754 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 182
|
1200 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 266
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 29Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast) at steady state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=9 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) at Steady State For CP-690,550
|
319 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 175
|
1300 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 241
|
1560 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 311
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose on Day 29Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to 12 hour concentration \[AUC(0-12)\] at steady state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=5 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=9 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hour Concentration [AUC(0-12)] at Steady State For CP-690,550
|
273 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 132
|
1090 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 150
|
1420 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 253
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=8 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) For CP-690,550
|
41.0 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 14.9
|
140 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 34.5
|
325 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 113
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 29Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=5 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=9 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State For CP-690,550
|
52.2 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 15.2
|
220 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 39.4
|
351 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 46.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=8 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) For CP-690,550
|
0.75 hours
Interval 0.5 to 2.0
|
1.50 hours
Interval 0.5 to 2.0
|
0.50 hours
Interval 0.5 to 2.0
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 29Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=5 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=9 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) at Steady State For CP-690,550
|
0.75 hours
Interval 0.5 to 2.0
|
0.50 hours
Interval 0.5 to 1.0
|
0.50 hours
Interval 0.5 to 1.0
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 29Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Rac obtained from AUC(0-12) (Day 29) divided by AUC(0-12) (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=5 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=7 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accumulation Ratio (Rac) For CP-690,550
|
1.48 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.467
|
1.39 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.245
|
1.22 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.182
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=4 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=2 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=8 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) For CP-690,550
|
3.36 hours
Standard Deviation 0.869
|
NA hours
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed because there were not enough participants to perform a meaningful analysis.
|
2.94 hours
Standard Deviation 0.620
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 29Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half at steady state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=4 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=8 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) at Steady State For CP-690,550
|
5.18 hours
Standard Deviation 2.00
|
5.15 hours
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
3.71 hours
Standard Deviation 0.201
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 1Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Pro-drug MMF was metabolically converted to active form MPA in the liver. The baseline for MPA trough concentrations was defined as the average of the values obtained at Screening and on Day 1 (pre-dose). MPA levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in MPA trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=10 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) Plasma Trough Concentration at Baseline
|
2.73 Milligram per Liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
2.18 Milligram per Liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
1.84 Milligram per Liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
2.43 Milligram per Liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 8Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Pro-drug MMF was metabolically converted to active form MPA in the liver. MPA levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in MPA trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=10 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) Plasma Trough Concentration at Day 8
|
3.25 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.77
|
2.11 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.01
|
1.29 mg/L
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
2.56 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 15Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Pro-drug MMF was metabolically converted to active form MPA in the liver. MPA levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in MPA trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=10 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) Plasma Trough Concentration at Day 15
|
3.15 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.75
|
2.36 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.21
|
1.48 mg/L
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
2.74 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 29Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Pro-drug MMF was metabolically converted to active form MPA in the liver. MPA levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in MPA trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=10 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) Plasma Trough Concentration at Day 29
|
2.61 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
2.68 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.00
|
4.30 mg/L
Standard Deviation 3.88
|
3.24 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 57Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Pro-drug MMF was metabolically converted to active form MPA in the liver. MPA levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in MPA trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=5 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=6 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=10 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) Plasma Trough Concentration at Day 57
|
2.60 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
2.89 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.75
|
1.75 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
2.67 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.87
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 1Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
The baseline for CsA trough concentrations was defined as the average of the values obtained at Screening and on Day 1 (pre-dose). CsA levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in CsA trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=1 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=5 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=3 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cyclosporine (CsA) Plasma Trough Concentration at Baseline
|
249.50 ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable since only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
81.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 41.99
|
173.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 51.11
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 8Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
CsA levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in CsA trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=1 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=4 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=3 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cyclosporine (CsA) Plasma Trough Concentration at Day 8
|
137.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable since only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
77.25 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 47.28
|
134.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 17.78
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 15Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
CsA levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in CsA trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=1 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=5 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=3 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cyclosporine (CsA) Plasma Trough Concentration at Day 15
|
207.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable since only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
86.60 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 43.71
|
160.33 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 24.58
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 29Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
CsA levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in CsA trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=1 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=5 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=3 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cyclosporine (CsA) Plasma Trough Concentration at Day 29
|
226.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable since only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
96.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 53.43
|
125.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 22.34
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 57Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
CsA levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in CsA trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=1 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=5 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=3 Participants
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cyclosporine (CsA) Plasma Trough Concentration at Day 57
|
292.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable since only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
91.20 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 72.71
|
152.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 43.28
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 1Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
The baseline for TAC trough concentrations was defined as the average of the values obtained at Screening and on Day 1 (pre-dose). TAC levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in TAC trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=2 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=3 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tacrolimus (TAC) Plasma Trough Concentration at Baseline
|
6.75 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2.47
|
7.17 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.76
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 8Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
TAC levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in TAC trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=2 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=3 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tacrolimus (TAC) Plasma Trough Concentration at Day 8
|
7.50 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
8.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 15Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
TAC levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in TAC trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=2 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=3 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tacrolimus (TAC) Plasma Trough Concentration at Day 15
|
8.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2.83
|
6.67 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 29Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
TAC levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in TAC trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=2 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=3 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tacrolimus (TAC) Plasma Trough Concentration at Day 29
|
7.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2.83
|
12.67 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 4.51
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 57Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
TAC levels were assessed at different visits to assess change in TAC trough levels due to CP-690,550 exposure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=2 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=3 Participants
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tacrolimus (TAC) Plasma Trough Concentration at Day 57
|
5.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
6.33 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Placebo, Stage 1
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo, Stage 1
n=6 participants at risk
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) with or without calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 participants at risk
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=6 participants at risk
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=10 participants at risk
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
33.3%
2/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo, Stage 1
n=6 participants at risk
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) with or without calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 5 mg, Stage 1
n=6 participants at risk
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg, Stage 1
n=6 participants at risk
CP-690,550 15 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF), calcineurin inhibitor (CsA or TAC) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg, Stage 1 And 2
n=10 participants at risk
CP-690,550 30 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Day 28 followed by single oral dose on Day 29 in stable renal transplant recipients, receiving maintenance immunosuppression therapy (MMF) as per local clinical practice in Stage 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
33.3%
2/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
20.0%
2/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
33.3%
2/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
20.0%
2/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Eructation
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival hyperplasia
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site haemorrhage
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
33.3%
2/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cytomegalovirus viraemia
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
20.0%
2/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Laryngitis
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Onychomycosis
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea versicolour
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test abnormal
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Reticulocyte count decreased
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Increased appetite
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Chest wall pain
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
50.0%
3/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Abnormal dreams
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep disorder
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngolaryngeal pain
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER