A 26-week Treatment Randomized, Double-blind, Double Dummy Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of QVA149
NCT ID: NCT01709903
Last Updated: 2015-03-17
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
744 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-11-30
2014-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
QVA149 Versus Fluticasone/Salmeterol in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
NCT01315249
Assessment of Switching From Salmeterol/Fluticasone to Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium in a symtomaticCOPD Patient Cohort
NCT02516592
Efficacy and Safety Study of QVA149 in COPD Patients
NCT02487446
Efficacy and Safety Study of Indacaterol Maleate/Glycopyrronium Bromide in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients.
NCT02487498
A Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Once-daily (q.d.) QVA149 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
NCT01202188
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study population will consist of approximate 736 male and female adults (age 40 years and greater) with a clinical diagnosis of stable COPD \[GOLD (2010)\] and a smoking history of at least 10 pack years. It is anticipated that approximately 981 patients will need to be screened in order to randomize 736 patients into 2 treatment arms of the study with an equal randomization ratio, meaning QVA149 (368 patients), fluticasone/salmeterol (368 patients). Treatment randomization will be stratified by current/ex-smoker status and prior ICS use. It is intended that 552 patients will complete the study at Week 26 without major protocol deviations. Dropouts will not be replaced.
This will be a multi-national study, including China, and at least two other countries.
Standardization FEV1 AUC0-12h will be performed in a subgroup of around 100 patients (50 patients per treatment arm) in pre-selected centers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
QVA149
QVA149 110/50 µg o.d., delivered via a single-dose dry powder inhaler (SDDPI), consisting of a fixed dose combination of indacaterol 110µg and NVA237 50µg
QVA149
QVA149 110/50 µg capsules q.d. for inhalation, delivered via Novartis single dose dry powder inhaler (SDDPI).
Placebo to fluticasone/salmeterol
Placebo to fluticasone/salmeterol with Accuhaler
fluticasone/salmeterol
Fluticasone/salmeterol 500/50 µg b.i.d., delivered via a dry powder inhaler Accuhaler® device
Fluticasone/salmeterol
Active fluticasone/salmeterol (500/50µg) b.i.d via a dry power inhaler Accuhaler® device.
Placebo to QVA149
Placebo to QVA149 with SDDPI
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
QVA149
QVA149 110/50 µg capsules q.d. for inhalation, delivered via Novartis single dose dry powder inhaler (SDDPI).
Fluticasone/salmeterol
Active fluticasone/salmeterol (500/50µg) b.i.d via a dry power inhaler Accuhaler® device.
Placebo to QVA149
Placebo to QVA149 with SDDPI
Placebo to fluticasone/salmeterol
Placebo to fluticasone/salmeterol with Accuhaler
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Current or ex-smokers who have a smoking history of at least 10 pack years. Patients with a post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) ≥ 30% and \< 80% of the predicted normal, and post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC \< 0.7.
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade of at least 2 at Visit 2.
Exclusion Criteria
Patents with narrow-angle glaucoma, symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), bladder-neck obstruction, moderate to severe renal impairment or urinary retention. BPH patients who are stable on treatment can be considered.
Patients with a history of long QT syndrome or whose QTc measured at run-in (Visit 2) (Fridericia method) is prolonged (\>450 ms for males and females) as confirmed by the central Electrocardiogram (ECG) assessor.
Patients with Type I or uncontrolled Type II diabetes. Patients who have not achieved spirometry result at Visit 2 in accordance with American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) criteria for acceptability and repeatability.
Patients with, a) any history of asthma or, b) onset of respiratory symptoms prior to age 40 years.
Patients with concomitant pulmonary disease (e.g. lung fibrosis, primary bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disorder, pulmonary hypertension).
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Rojas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Novartis Investigative Site
Viña del Mar, Vina Del Mar, Chile
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanning, Guangxi, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Changsha, Hunan, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Changsha, Hunan, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Shengyang, Liaoning, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Qingdao, Shandong, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Xi’an, Shanxi, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Xi’an, Shanxi, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Chongqing, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Chongqing, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Chongqing, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Jiangyin, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanjing, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Niaosong Township, Taiwan, Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Taichung, Taiwan, Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei County, Taiwan, Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Lin-Ko, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zhong N, Wang C, Zhou X, Zhang N, Humphries M, Wang L, Patalano F, Banerji D. Efficacy and Safety of Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) Versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Chinese Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Chinese Cohort from the LANTERN Study. COPD. 2016 Dec;13(6):686-692. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2016.1182970. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
Zhong N, Wang C, Zhou X, Zhang N, Humphries M, Wang L, Thach C, Patalano F, Banerji D; LANTERN Investigators. LANTERN: a randomized study of QVA149 versus salmeterol/fluticasone combination in patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Jun 5;10:1015-26. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S84436. eCollection 2015.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CQVA149A2331
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.