Trial Outcomes & Findings for Radial Reload Laparoscopic LAR Case Series (NCT NCT01706822)
NCT ID: NCT01706822
Last Updated: 2015-03-18
Results Overview
The surgeon's ability to achieve a staple line at the desired level of the rectum.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
8 participants
Operative
2015-03-18
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler With Tri-Staple Technology
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology in laparoscopic low anterior resection or proctosigmoidectomy.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Radial Reload Laparoscopic LAR Case Series
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler With Tri-Staple Technology
n=8 Participants
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology in laparoscopic low anterior resection or proctosigmoidectomy
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
66.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Height
|
165.0 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
73.9 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
27.0 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: OperativeThe surgeon's ability to achieve a staple line at the desired level of the rectum.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler With Tri-Staple Technology
n=8 Participants
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology in laparoscopic low anterior resection or proctosigmoidectomy.
|
|---|---|
|
The Surgeon's Ability to Achieve a Staple Line at the Desired Level of the Rectum. The Reported Value Represents the Number of Participants in Whom the Criteria Was Met
|
6 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: OperativeThe ability to achieve adequate distal margins (defined as \>2cm \[or \>1cm with clear histologic evaluation\]) in the low rectum.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler With Tri-Staple Technology
n=8 Participants
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology in laparoscopic low anterior resection or proctosigmoidectomy.
|
|---|---|
|
The Ability to Achieve Adequate Distal Margins (Defined as >2cm [or >1cm With Clear Histologic Evaluation]) in the Low Rectum. The Reported Value Represents the Number of Participants in Whom the Criteria Was Met
|
7 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Operatively1\. Access measured by surgeon usability questionnaire.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler With Tri-Staple Technology
n=8 Participants
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology in laparoscopic low anterior resection or proctosigmoidectomy.
|
|---|---|
|
Access Measured by Surgeon Usability Questionnaire. The Reported Values Represent Percentage of Cases Surgeon Agree/Strongly Agree
Was the rectum contained in device after clamping
|
50 % of cases surgeon agree/strongly agree
|
|
Access Measured by Surgeon Usability Questionnaire. The Reported Values Represent Percentage of Cases Surgeon Agree/Strongly Agree
Radial Reload (RR) easy to place in pelvis
|
62.5 % of cases surgeon agree/strongly agree
|
|
Access Measured by Surgeon Usability Questionnaire. The Reported Values Represent Percentage of Cases Surgeon Agree/Strongly Agree
RR was easy to get low in the pelvis
|
87.5 % of cases surgeon agree/strongly agree
|
|
Access Measured by Surgeon Usability Questionnaire. The Reported Values Represent Percentage of Cases Surgeon Agree/Strongly Agree
RR was easy to place in the colon and the rectum
|
50 % of cases surgeon agree/strongly agree
|
|
Access Measured by Surgeon Usability Questionnaire. The Reported Values Represent Percentage of Cases Surgeon Agree/Strongly Agree
RR retained an adequate amount of tissue
|
75 % of cases surgeon agree/strongly agree
|
|
Access Measured by Surgeon Usability Questionnaire. The Reported Values Represent Percentage of Cases Surgeon Agree/Strongly Agree
Was the rectum transected with one firing
|
12.5 % of cases surgeon agree/strongly agree
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Operatively2\. Visibility measured by surgeon usability questionnaire
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler With Tri-Staple Technology
n=8 Participants
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology in laparoscopic low anterior resection or proctosigmoidectomy.
|
|---|---|
|
Visibility Measured by Surgeon Usability Questionnaire. The Reported Values Represent Percentage of Cases Surgeon Agree/Strongly Agree
Visibility was adequate when RR was used
|
87.5 % of cases surgeon agree/strongly agree
|
|
Visibility Measured by Surgeon Usability Questionnaire. The Reported Values Represent Percentage of Cases Surgeon Agree/Strongly Agree
Did the instrument impede the visibility
|
0 % of cases surgeon agree/strongly agree
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Operatively3\. Maneuverability measured by surgeon usability questionnaire Question: Maneuverability of Radial reload during the procedure was adequate
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler With Tri-Staple Technology
n=8 Participants
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology in laparoscopic low anterior resection or proctosigmoidectomy.
|
|---|---|
|
Maneuverability Measured by Surgeon Usability Questionnaire. The Reported Values Represent Percentage of Cases Surgeon Agree/Strongly Agree
|
62.5 % of cases surgeon agree/strongly agree
|
Adverse Events
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler With Tri-Staple Technology
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler With Tri-Staple Technology
n=8 participants at risk
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology in laparoscopic low anterior resection or proctosigmoidectomy
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected through the 30 day follow-up visit
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pneumoperitoneum
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected through the 30 day follow-up visit
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postoperative ileus
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected through the 30 day follow-up visit
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural complication
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected through the 30 day follow-up visit
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteric obstruction
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected through the 30 day follow-up visit
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler With Tri-Staple Technology
n=8 participants at risk
Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology in laparoscopic low anterior resection or proctosigmoidectomy
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected through the 30 day follow-up visit
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Interoperative bleeding
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected through the 30 day follow-up visit
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place