Local Anaesthesia vs Regional Block for Arteriovenous Fistulae

NCT ID: NCT01706354

Last Updated: 2012-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

126 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

End stage renal failure (ESRF)describes an irreversible loss in renal function. The majority of these patients will opt for haemodialysis (HD)as their chosen method of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are the optimal method of achieving vascular access to permit HD. AVF are created with a small surgical procdure to join the artery and vein together. Over the next 6- 8weeks after surgery the AVF should grow ("mature") into a vessel suitable for needles to be inserted for dialysis. Unfortunately however, around 24% - 35% of AVF fail at an early stage. Some anaesthetic techniques can influence intraoperative blood flow and venous diameter, factors which are associated with fistula success. There remains no conclusive evidence that any particular anaesthetic technique can significantly influence long term surgical outcome. This study aims to investigate whether a regional, compared to local, anaesthetic technique can affect fistula patency.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) describes abnormal kidney structure or function and is a significant public health problem. It is common, increasingly prevalent with age and often co-exists with significant morbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, cerebrovascular disease and coronary artery disease. Patients with a diagnosis of CKD have a decreased life expectancy compared with individuals without this diagnosis. This is primarily due to cardiovascular disease, but other complications of CKD include bone and mineral disorders, anaemia, depression, and malnutrition. Early recognition and treatment of these complications is recommended.

In a proportion of patients, CKD will progress to end stage renal disease (ESRD). This is defined as an irreversible decline in kidney function for which renal replacement therapy (RRT) is required if the patient is to survive. In one UK study, 4% of patients with CKD progressed to develop ESRD requiring RRT over a five and a half year follow up period. The decision to commence RRT takes into account symptoms of biochemical disturbance, in conjunction with the risks and inconvenience of starting RRT. European Best Practice Guidelines recommend that RRT should commence when the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) falls below 15ml/min/1.73m2 or when symptoms of uraemia, fluid overload or malnutrition are resistant to medical therapy. In an asymptomatic patient, an eGFR of below 6ml/min/1.73m2 would also prompt the initiation of dialysis. It is known that the life expectancy of patients receiving RRT is shorter than that of the general population and varies further dependent on underlying diagnosis and age. For example, the median survival for a patient in Scotland aged 45 - 64 years starting RRT for glomerulonephritis is 7.7 years, whereas the median survival of a patient in the same age group with a diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy is 2.9 years. The life expectancy of a male of the same age group within the general Scottish population is 24.2 years. Instituting RRT prolongs life and reduces the incidence of vasculo-occlusive events in patients with ESRD. As such, patients with CKD should be monitored by a nephrologist in order that timely referral for preparation for RRT can be made.

Renal replacement therapy may come in the form of haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or renal transplantation, and may be managed both in and out of hospital. Haemodialysis (HD) remains the most common modality of first RRT in Scotland; of 2885 patients commencing RRT during the period 2005-2009, 2264 received HD. In order to undergo HD, there must be a connection between the patient's vascular system and the dialysis machine. The most common method is surgical creation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF), into which a needle can be inserted that in turn is connected to a dialysis machine. In 2009, 75% of Scottish patients undergoing HD underwent formation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Other options for vascular access include arteriovenous grafts using synthetic materials and long-term central venous catheters, though these are associated with higher rates of occlusive and infective complications. AVF are currently regarded as the optimal form of vascular access for HD and are recommended by National guidelines. There is excellent evidence that good quality, stable vascular access is a major factor in determining survival in this group of CKD patients. Unfortunately however, around 24% - 35% of arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) fail at an early stage. Some anaesthetic techniques can influence intraoperative blood flow and venous diameter, factors which are associated with fistula success. There remains no conclusive evidence that any particular anaesthetic technique can significantly influence long term surgical outcome. This study aims to investigate whether a regional, compared to local, anaesthetic technique can affect fistula patency.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

End Stage Renal Disease

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

end stage renal disease vascular access regional anaesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Local anaesthetic

Infiltration of local anaesthetic into the surgical site by the surgeon using a combination of 0.5% L-bupivicaine prior to incision and 1% lignocaine topically after the wound is opened. Maximum dose limits of 2mg/kg for bupivicaine, and 3mg/kg for lignocaine will be observed, recognising that these are additive.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local Anaesthetic

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Infiltration of local anaesthetic into the surgical site by the surgeon using a combination of 0.5% L-bupivicaine prior to incision and 1% lignocaine topically after the wound is opened. Maximum dose limits of 2mg/kg for bupivicaine, and 3mg/kg for lignocaine will be observed, recognising that these are additive.

Regional anaesthetic

Ultrasound guided brachial plexus block. Supraclavicular will be the block performed unless there is a contraindication in which case axillary block may be used. A 1:1 mixture of 0.5% L-bupivicaine and 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline (1 in 200,000) will be injected, up to a volume of 40ml but using a minimum of 25ml. Maximum dose limits of 2mg for bupivicaine and 7mg/kg for lignocaine with adrenaline will be observed, recognising that these are additive.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Regional anaesthetic

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound guided brachial plexus block. Supraclavicular will be the block performed unless there is a contraindication in which case axillary block may be used. A 1:1 mixture of 0.5% L-bupivicaine and 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline (1 in 200,000) will be injected, up to a volume of 40ml but using a minimum of 25ml. Maximum dose limits of 2mg for bupivicaine and 7mg/kg for lignocaine with adrenaline will be observed, recognising that these are additive.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Local Anaesthetic

Infiltration of local anaesthetic into the surgical site by the surgeon using a combination of 0.5% L-bupivicaine prior to incision and 1% lignocaine topically after the wound is opened. Maximum dose limits of 2mg/kg for bupivicaine, and 3mg/kg for lignocaine will be observed, recognising that these are additive.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Regional anaesthetic

Ultrasound guided brachial plexus block. Supraclavicular will be the block performed unless there is a contraindication in which case axillary block may be used. A 1:1 mixture of 0.5% L-bupivicaine and 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline (1 in 200,000) will be injected, up to a volume of 40ml but using a minimum of 25ml. Maximum dose limits of 2mg for bupivicaine and 7mg/kg for lignocaine with adrenaline will be observed, recognising that these are additive.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* English-speaking
* Adult patients \>18 years old
* Competent to give consent
* Scheduled for primary AVF formation at either radial or brachial artery.

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergy to local anaesthetic.
* Coagulopathy
* Infection at the anaesthetic or surgical site.
* Patient preference for general or alternative anaesthesia
* Significant peripheral neuropathy or neurologic disorder affecting the upper extremity
* Pregnancy
* Previous AVF creation
* Known cephalic vein occlusion, central vein stenosis, brachial or radial artery stenosis
* Vein or artery less than 1.8mm, as measured by ultrasound
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Emma Aitken

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Emma Aitken

Clinical Research Fellow Department of Renal Surgery

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marc Clancy, MBBS FRCS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Renal Surgery, Western Infirmary

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Marc Clancy, MBBS PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0141 211 1750

Email: [email protected]

Emma Aitken, MBChB MRCS

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0141 211 1750

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Marc Clancy, MBBS PhD FRCS

Role: primary

Emma Aitken, MBChB MRCS

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aitken E, Kearns R, Gaianu L, Jackson A, Steven M, Kinsella J, Clancy M, Macfarlane A. Long-Term Functional Patency and Cost-Effectiveness of Arteriovenous Fistula Creation under Regional Anesthesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1871-1882. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019111209. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32709710 (View on PubMed)

Aitken E, Jackson A, Kearns R, Steven M, Kinsella J, Clancy M, Macfarlane A. Effect of regional versus local anaesthesia on outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1067-1074. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30948-5. Epub 2016 Aug 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27492881 (View on PubMed)

Macfarlane AJ, Kearns RJ, Aitken E, Kinsella J, Clancy MJ. Does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation? Trials. 2013 Aug 19;14:263. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-263.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23958289 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12/WS/0199

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id