Capecitabine and Celecoxib in Patients With Solid Cancers That Have Been Previously Treated With Standard Therapies
NCT ID: NCT01705106
Last Updated: 2018-05-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE1
21 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-29
2016-02-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Irinotecan and Capecitabine in Treating Patients With Solid Tumors
NCT00003867
Sirolimus in Treating Patients With Solid Tumors That Are Metastatic or Cannot Be Removed By Surgery
NCT01791088
A Study to Test the Addition of the Drug Cabozantinib to Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Osteosarcoma
NCT05691478
A Trial of Thalidomide, Celecoxib, Etoposide and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Relapsed or Progressive Cancer
NCT00165451
Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Refractory Advanced Solid Tumors or Hematologic Cancer
NCT00004065
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To compare steady state pharmacokinetics (PK) (primarily minimum concentration \[Cmin\], maximum concentration \[Cmax\], and area under the curve \[AUC\]) of celecoxib on day 7 of monotherapy versus on day 14 of concomitant administration with capecitabine.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To develop a celecoxib PK drug interaction model using longitudinal data and determine whether the results are concordant with results from the primary objective.
II. To assess the impact of known cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) pharmacogenetic variants with reduced enzyme activity (CYP2C9\*2 and \*3) on the between subject variability in celecoxib PK.
III. To assess tumor response by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1) and explore whether there is any correlation between celecoxib PK and response.
IV. To assess toxicity by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 4.0) and explore whether there is any correlation between celecoxib PK and toxicities related to either celecoxib or capecitabine.
OUTLINE:
Patients receive celecoxib orally (PO) twice daily (BID) for 7 days (course 0) and then on days 1-21 of course 1 and all subsequent courses. Patients also receive capecitabine PO BID on days 1-14 beginning in course 1. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment (capecitabine, celecoxib)
Patients receive celecoxib PO BID for 7 days (course 0) and then on days 1-21 of course 1 and all subsequent courses. Patients also receive capecitabine PO BID on days 1-14 beginning in course 1. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
capecitabine
Given PO
celecoxib
Given PO
pharmacological study
Correlative studies
laboratory biomarker analysis
Correlative studies
pharmacogenomic studies
Correlative studies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
capecitabine
Given PO
celecoxib
Given PO
pharmacological study
Correlative studies
laboratory biomarker analysis
Correlative studies
pharmacogenomic studies
Correlative studies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
OR
Histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumor for which single agent capecitabine is an appropriate treatment option.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =\< 1
* Life expectancy \> 3 months
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>= l500/ul
* Hemoglobin \>= 9g/dL
* Platelets \>= 100,000/ul
* Creatinine within institutional normal limits or glomerular filtration rate \>= 50 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD EPI) equation
* Total bilirubin \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal
* Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamic pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) \< 2.5 x upper limit of normal for patients without liver metastases OR SGOT and SGPT \< 5 x upper limit of normal for patients with liver metastases
* Measurable or non-measurable disease will be allowed
* Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation, up until 30 days after final study treatment; should a woman become pregnant or suspect that she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately
* Patients taking substrates of CYP2C9 should be encouraged to switch to alternative drugs whenever possible, given the potential for drug-drug interactions with the study drugs
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients taking any of the following drugs are excluded: inducers or inhibitors of CYP2C9, warfarin, aspirin, corticosteroids, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
* History of myocardial infarction or stroke within the last 6 months, or history of uncontrolled cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease; a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) will be performed during the screening period
* History of perforation or bleeding related to peptic ulcer disease
* History of hypersensitivity or allergy to study drugs, aspirin, sulfonamides, or NSAIDs
* Known poor metabolizers of CYP2C9 substrates
* Known deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)
* Patients who have had chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or investigational anti-cancer therapy within 4 weeks of starting study drug, or radiotherapy within 14 days of starting study drug, or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier
* Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents or any concomitant antineoplastic therapy, with the exception of androgen ablating agents (for patients with prior prostate cancer)
* Serious underlying medical or psychiatric illnesses that would, in the opinion of the treating physician, substantially increase the risk for complications related to treatment; similarly, any unstable medical condition that in the opinion of the treating physician or study investigators, would interfere with determination of the study objectives
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Major surgery within 4 weeks
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
University of Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Manish R. Sharma, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wood K, Byron E, Janisch L, Salgia R, Sharma MR. Capecitabine and Celecoxib as a Promising Therapy for Thymic Neoplasms. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct;41(10):963-966. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000400.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2012-01704
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
12-1318
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.