Trial Outcomes & Findings for IntErnational Long-term Follow-up Study of Patients With Uncontrolled HyperTensioN (NCT NCT01705080)
NCT ID: NCT01705080
Last Updated: 2021-05-27
Results Overview
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
TERMINATED
276 participants
Baseline to 6 months
2021-05-27
Participant Flow
A total of 276 subjects who underwent renal artery ablation fell into the analysis population of three predefined arms at 33 investigational sites located throughout Europe and Australia. The enrollment began on January 2013 and the last subject was enrolled on 06 September, 2016. The patients last follow-up visit occurred on 27 November, 2019.
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
147
|
101
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
Renal Artery Ablation Procedure
|
147
|
101
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
Discharge Following Renal Artery Ablation Procedure
|
147
|
100
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
72
|
49
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
75
|
52
|
16
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Missed visit
|
10
|
4
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
61
|
44
|
9
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=147 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=101 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=28 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
Total
n=276 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=147 Participants
|
58.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=101 Participants
|
68.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=28 Participants
|
60.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=276 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
64 Participants
n=147 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=101 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
100 Participants
n=276 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
83 Participants
n=147 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=101 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
176 Participants
n=276 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Office Blood Pressure
Systolic
|
180.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.3 • n=147 Participants
|
160.8 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.5 • n=101 Participants
|
177.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.3 • n=28 Participants
|
172.9 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.6 • n=276 Participants
|
|
Office Blood Pressure
Diastolic
|
97.1 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 • n=147 Participants
|
91.2 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 • n=101 Participants
|
90.6 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 • n=28 Participants
|
94.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2 • n=276 Participants
|
|
24-hour ambulatory blood pressure
Systolic
|
159.0 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 • n=135 Participants • The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
|
147.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=93 Participants • The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
|
161.8 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3 • n=24 Participants • The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
|
155.0 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 • n=252 Participants • The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
|
|
24-hour ambulatory blood pressure
Diastolic
|
88.9 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 • n=135 Participants • The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
|
87.0 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4 • n=93 Participants • The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
|
82.9 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 • n=24 Participants • The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
|
87.6 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=252 Participants • The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=142 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=96 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=27 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Reduction in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
Baseline
|
179.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 22.3
|
160.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.9
|
177.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 22.7
|
|
Mean Reduction in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
Change from baseline to 6 months
|
-16.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 26.7
|
-12.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 21.8
|
-18.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 25.8
|
|
Mean Reduction in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
6 Months
|
163.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 25.1
|
147.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.2
|
158.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 21.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 days post procedurePopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
The peri-procedural events occurring within 30 days post procedure were summarized as the percentage of the number of participants with peri-procedural events within 30 days post procedure compared to the number of participants at baseline for that population.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=147 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=101 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=28 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Acute Safety: Percentage of Participants With Peri-procedural Events Within 30 Days Post-procedure
|
49 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
The new renal artery stenosis (\>50%) and/or aneurysm at the site of ablation per Renal Artery Imaging (CT/MR) was summarized at each follow-up visit as the percentage of patients who have stenosis and/or aneurysm. Kaplan-meier analysis was performed on the time to the first new renal artery stenosis and/or aneurysm at the site of ablation, as appropriate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=147 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=101 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=28 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Midterm Safety: Percentage of Participants With New Renal Artery Stenosis and/or Aneurysm at Ablation Site at 6 Months
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Confirmatory visit to 6 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Renal function change based on eGFR was summarized by computing the change of the eGFR at each follow-up visit compared to baseline for each patient with data available in both time points and calculating the mean and standard deviation of the eGFR change at those intervals.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=131 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=93 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=27 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Midterm Safety: Mean Change in eGFR (mL/Min/1.73m²) From Confirmatory Visit to 6 Months
Confirmatory visit
|
80.2 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 20.2
|
78.6 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 17.6
|
35.3 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 8.2
|
|
Midterm Safety: Mean Change in eGFR (mL/Min/1.73m²) From Confirmatory Visit to 6 Months
6 months
|
79.5 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 24.7
|
79.6 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 19.6
|
41.3 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 12.7
|
|
Midterm Safety: Mean Change in eGFR (mL/Min/1.73m²) From Confirmatory Visit to 6 Months
Change from confirmatory visit to 6 months
|
-0.7 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 14.4
|
1.1 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 13.5
|
5.9 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 11.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
The new renal artery stenosis (\>50%) and/or aneurysm at the site of ablation per RenalArtery Imaging (CT/MR) was summarized at each follow-up visit as the percentage of patients who have stenosis and/or aneurysm. Kaplan-meier analysis was performed onthe time to the first new renal artery stenosis and/or aneurysm at the site of ablation, as appropriate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=147 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=101 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=28 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Long Term Safety: Percentage of Participants With New Renal Artery Stenosis and/or Aneurysm at Ablation Site at 2 Years
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
The new renal artery stenosis (\>50%) and/or aneurysm at the site of ablation per RenalArtery Imaging (CT/MR) was summarized at each follow-up visit as the percentage of patients who have stenosis and/or aneurysm. Kaplan-meier analysis was performed onthe time to the first new renal artery stenosis and/or aneurysm at the site of ablation, as appropriate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=147 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=101 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=28 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Long Term Safety: Percentage of Participants With New Renal Artery Stenosis and/or Aneurysm at Ablation Site at 5 Years
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Confirmatory visit to 2 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Renal function change based on eGFR was summarized by computing the change of the eGFR at each follow-up visit compared to baseline for each patient with data available in both time points and calculating the mean and standard deviation of the eGFR change at those intervals.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=103 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=81 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=20 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Long Term Safety: Mean Change in eGFR (mL/Min/1.73m²) From Confirmatory Visit to 2 Years
Confirmatory visit
|
79.4 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 17.4
|
78.4 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 19.0
|
36.3 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 8.2
|
|
Long Term Safety: Mean Change in eGFR (mL/Min/1.73m²) From Confirmatory Visit to 2 Years
2 years
|
76.4 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 21.6
|
77.7 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 19.0
|
41.1 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 14.1
|
|
Long Term Safety: Mean Change in eGFR (mL/Min/1.73m²) From Confirmatory Visit to 2 Years
Change from confirmatory visit to 2 years
|
-3.0 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 15.8
|
-0.7 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 14.9
|
4.8 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 13.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Confirmatory visit to 5 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Renal function change based on eGFR was summarized by computing the change of the eGFR at each follow-up visit compared to baseline for each patient with data available in both time points and calculating the mean and standard deviation of the eGFR change at those intervals.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=63 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=43 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=12 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Long Term Safety: Mean Change in eGFR (mL/Min/1.73m²) From Confirmatory Visit to 5 Years
Confirmatory visit
|
77.6 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 14.7
|
80.8 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 17.2
|
38.6 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 7.5
|
|
Long Term Safety: Mean Change in eGFR (mL/Min/1.73m²) From Confirmatory Visit to 5 Years
5 years
|
67.9 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 20.0
|
77.0 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 18.6
|
37.5 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 16.5
|
|
Long Term Safety: Mean Change in eGFR (mL/Min/1.73m²) From Confirmatory Visit to 5 Years
Change from confirmatory visit to 5 years
|
-9.7 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 17.3
|
-3.8 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 15.7
|
-1.1 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 14.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurements were taken according to Standard Joint National Committee VII Guidelines / ESC and ESH Guidelines at each follow-up visit. In the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the blood pressure of patient was measured every 30 minutes during the daytime and every 60 minutes during the night time. When using ABP, it was ensured that at least two measurements per hour are taken during the person's usual waking hours and 1 measurement per hour are taken during the person's usual night time hours. The average value of at least 14 measurements taken during the person's usual waking hours and average of at least 8 measurements taken during the person's usual sleeping hours were used for calculation of mean value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=121 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=85 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=21 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
6 months
|
151.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.2
|
142.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.3
|
152.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.9
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
Baseline
|
158.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.7
|
147.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
160.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.9
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
Change from baseline to 6 months
|
-7.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.5
|
-4.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.1
|
-8.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 24.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurements were taken according to Standard Joint National Committee VII Guidelines / ESC and ESH Guidelines at each follow-up visit. In the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the blood pressure of patient was measured every 30 minutes during the daytime and every 60 minutes during the night time. When using ABP, it was ensured that at least two measurements per hour are taken during the person's usual waking hours and 1 measurement per hour are taken during the person's usual night time hours. The average value of at least 14 measurements taken during the person's usual waking hours and average of at least 8 measurements taken during the person's usual sleeping hours were used for calculation of mean value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=121 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=85 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=21 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
Baseline
|
88.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.7
|
86.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.3
|
83.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.8
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
6 months
|
85.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
83.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
78.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.9
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
Change from baseline to 6 months
|
-3.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.3
|
-3.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.4
|
-5.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=142 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=96 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=27 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
Baseline
|
97.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.2
|
91.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.6
|
91.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.3
|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
6 months
|
89.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.6
|
86.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.4
|
77.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.4
|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
Change from baseline to 6 months
|
-7.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.9
|
-5.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.2
|
-13.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
The percentage of participants achieved office systolic blood pressure \<140 mmHg at 6 months visit was computed as the percentage of the ratio of number of participants who achievied office systolic blood pressure \<140 mmHg at 6 months visit to the number of participants with data available in 6 months visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=142 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=96 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=27 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieved Office Systolic Blood Pressure < 140 mmHg at 6 Months
|
19 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 yearPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=132 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=94 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=26 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 1 Year Post Denervation
Baseline
|
180.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 22.4
|
160.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.6
|
176.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 23.0
|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 1 Year Post Denervation
1 year
|
166.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 25.6
|
147.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 20.8
|
159.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 26.6
|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 1 Year Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 1 year
|
-13.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 26.6
|
-12.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 22.6
|
-17.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 28.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=117 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=85 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=23 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 2 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
178.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 22.0
|
158.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.6
|
178.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 22.4
|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 2 Years Post Denervation
2 years
|
160.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 26.5
|
144.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 19.5
|
153.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 2 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 2 years
|
-18.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 29.0
|
-14.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 20.9
|
-24.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 27.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=97 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=72 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=20 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 3 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
179.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 21.9
|
160.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
179.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 23.7
|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 3 Years Post Denervation
3 years
|
159.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 28.5
|
143.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 19.4
|
151.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 21.3
|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 3 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 3 years
|
-20.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 34.1
|
-16.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 23.1
|
-27.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 28.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 4 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=90 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=68 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=18 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
177.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 21.8
|
157.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.4
|
180.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 24.1
|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4 Years Post Denervation
4 years
|
156.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 28.8
|
144.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 25.3
|
146.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 23.5
|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 4 years
|
-21.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 35.4
|
-13.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 24.9
|
-33.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 24.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 5 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=71 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=49 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=12 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 5 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
176.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 20.3
|
160.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.3
|
184.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 24.6
|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 5 Years Post Denervation
5 years
|
151.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 22.6
|
144.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 21.8
|
152.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 19.1
|
|
Mean Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 5 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 5 years
|
-24.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 28.4
|
-15.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 24.8
|
-32.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 25.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 yearPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=132 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=94 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=26 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 1 Year Post Denervation
Baseline
|
97.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.6
|
91.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.5
|
91.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.3
|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 1 Year Post Denervation
1 year
|
90.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.6
|
85.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.7
|
78.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.2
|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 1 Year Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 1 year
|
-6.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.0
|
-5.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.2
|
-13.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=117 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=85 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=23 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 2 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
97.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.8
|
91.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.7
|
92.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 2 Years Post Denervation
2 years
|
88.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.6
|
83.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
75.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.3
|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 2 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 2 years
|
-8.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.5
|
-7.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.3
|
-16.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=97 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=72 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=20 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 3 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
98.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
92.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.2
|
91.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.3
|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 3 Years Post Denervation
3 years
|
87.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.8
|
82.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
76.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.8
|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 3 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 3 years
|
-11.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.4
|
-9.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
-14.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 4 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=90 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=68 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=18 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
97.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
91.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.7
|
93.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4 Years Post Denervation
4 years
|
86.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.5
|
85.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.3
|
77.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.3
|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 4 years
|
-11.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.2
|
-5.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.4
|
-16.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 5 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
Office blood pressure corresponds to the blood pressure measured by the doctor or the nurse/staff in the office or in the clinic during the participant visit. Office Blood Pressure measurements was recorded as the average Blood Pressure of three measurements. If there was a change in medication after the office Blood Pressure assessment was completed an additional set of office Blood Pressure measurements was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=71 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=49 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=12 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 5 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
98.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.3
|
93.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
95.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 5 Years Post Denervation
5 years
|
84.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.7
|
85.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.1
|
78.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.7
|
|
Mean Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 5 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 5 years
|
-13.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.4
|
-8.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.5
|
-17.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 yearPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurements were taken according to Standard Joint National Committee VII Guidelines / ESC and ESH Guidelines at each follow-up visit. In the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the blood pressure of patient was measured every 30 minutes during the daytime and every 60 minutes during the night time. When using ABP, it was ensured that at least two measurements per hour are taken during the person's usual waking hours and 1 measurement per hour are taken during the person's usual night time hours. The average value of at least 14 measurements taken during the person's usual waking hours and average of at least 8 measurements taken during the person's usual sleeping hours were used for calculation of mean value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=105 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=78 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=19 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 1 Year Post Denervation
Baseline
|
159.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.1
|
146.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
163.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.8
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 1 Year Post Denervation
1 year
|
149.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.7
|
141.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.3
|
148.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 21.1
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 1 Year Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 1 year
|
-10.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.3
|
-5.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.8
|
-15.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 24.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurements were taken according to Standard Joint National Committee VII Guidelines / ESC and ESH Guidelines at each follow-up visit. In the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the blood pressure of patient was measured every 30 minutes during the daytime and every 60 minutes during the night time. When using ABP, it was ensured that at least two measurements per hour are taken during the person's usual waking hours and 1 measurement per hour are taken during the person's usual night time hours. The average value of at least 14 measurements taken during the person's usual waking hours and average of at least 8 measurements taken during the person's usual sleeping hours were used for calculation of mean value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=92 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=70 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=16 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 2 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
158.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.8
|
146.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.8
|
159.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.8
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 2 Years Post Denervation
2 years
|
148.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.2
|
139.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.0
|
144.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.7
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 2 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 2 years
|
-10.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.6
|
-7.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.0
|
-15.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurements were taken according to Standard Joint National Committee VII Guidelines / ESC and ESH Guidelines at each follow-up visit. In the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the blood pressure of patient was measured every 30 minutes during the daytime and every 60 minutes during the night time. When using ABP, it was ensured that at least two measurements per hour are taken during the person's usual waking hours and 1 measurement per hour are taken during the person's usual night time hours. The average value of at least 14 measurements taken during the person's usual waking hours and average of at least 8 measurements taken during the person's usual sleeping hours were used for calculation of mean value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=72 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=57 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=11 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 3 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 3 years
|
-13.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 21.5
|
-7.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.8
|
-4.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 20.5
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 3 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
157.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.9
|
147.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.9
|
156.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.8
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 3 Years Post Denervation
3 years
|
144.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 19.3
|
139.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.1
|
151.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 4 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurements were taken according to Standard Joint National Committee VII Guidelines / ESC and ESH Guidelines at each follow-up visit. In the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the blood pressure of patient was measured every 30 minutes during the daytime and every 60 minutes during the night time. When using ABP, it was ensured that at least two measurements per hour are taken during the person's usual waking hours and 1 measurement per hour are taken during the person's usual night time hours. The average value of at least 14 measurements taken during the person's usual waking hours and average of at least 8 measurements taken during the person's usual sleeping hours were used for calculation of mean value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=67 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=56 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=12 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 4 years
|
-14.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 22.4
|
-8.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.8
|
-6.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 29.6
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
157.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.5
|
146.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.7
|
158.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.4
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4 Years Post Denervation
4 years
|
142.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 19.6
|
137.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 19.1
|
151.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 21.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 5 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurements were taken according to Standard Joint National Committee VII Guidelines / ESC and ESH Guidelines at each follow-up visit. In the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the blood pressure of patient was measured every 30 minutes during the daytime and every 60 minutes during the night time. When using ABP, it was ensured that at least two measurements per hour are taken during the person's usual waking hours and 1 measurement per hour are taken during the person's usual night time hours. The average value of at least 14 measurements taken during the person's usual waking hours and average of at least 8 measurements taken during the person's usual sleeping hours were used for calculation of mean value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=50 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=35 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=10 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 5 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
155.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.9
|
143.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
158.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.1
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 5 Years Post Denervation
5 years
|
140.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.8
|
133.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.4
|
146.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 26.3
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 5 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 5 years
|
-15.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 22.0
|
-10.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.8
|
-11.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 33.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 yearPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurements were taken according to Standard Joint National Committee VII Guidelines / ESC and ESH Guidelines at each follow-up visit. In the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the blood pressure of patient was measured every 30 minutes during the daytime and every 60 minutes during the night time. When using ABP, it was ensured that at least two measurements per hour are taken during the person's usual waking hours and 1 measurement per hour are taken during the person's usual night time hours. The average value of at least 14 measurements taken during the person's usual waking hours and average of at least 8 measurements taken during the person's usual sleeping hours were used for calculation of mean value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=105 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=78 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=19 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 1 Year Post Denervation
Baseline
|
89.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
86.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.1
|
85.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.3
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 1 Year Post Denervation
1 year
|
84.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.0
|
81.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.2
|
77.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.2
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 1 Year Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 1 year
|
-4.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.4
|
-4.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.4
|
-7.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurements were taken according to Standard Joint National Committee VII Guidelines / ESC and ESH Guidelines at each follow-up visit. In the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the blood pressure of patient was measured every 30 minutes during the daytime and every 60 minutes during the night time. When using ABP, it was ensured that at least two measurements per hour are taken during the person's usual waking hours and 1 measurement per hour are taken during the person's usual night time hours. The average value of at least 14 measurements taken during the person's usual waking hours and average of at least 8 measurements taken during the person's usual sleeping hours were used for calculation of mean value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=92 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=70 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=16 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 2 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 2 years
|
-4.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.4
|
-5.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.3
|
-7.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.8
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 2 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
88.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.2
|
86.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.2
|
84.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.9
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 2 Years Post Denervation
2 years
|
83.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.0
|
81.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
76.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurements were taken according to Standard Joint National Committee VII Guidelines / ESC and ESH Guidelines at each follow-up visit. In the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the blood pressure of patient was measured every 30 minutes during the daytime and every 60 minutes during the night time. When using ABP, it was ensured that at least two measurements per hour are taken during the person's usual waking hours and 1 measurement per hour are taken during the person's usual night time hours. The average value of at least 14 measurements taken during the person's usual waking hours and average of at least 8 measurements taken during the person's usual sleeping hours were used for calculation of mean value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=72 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=57 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=11 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 3 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
89.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
87.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.7
|
81.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.7
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 3 Years Post Denervation
3 years
|
81.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
81.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
76.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 3 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 3 years
|
-7.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.8
|
-6.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.9
|
-4.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 4 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurements were taken according to Standard Joint National Committee VII Guidelines / ESC and ESH Guidelines at each follow-up visit. In the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the blood pressure of patient was measured every 30 minutes during the daytime and every 60 minutes during the night time. When using ABP, it was ensured that at least two measurements per hour are taken during the person's usual waking hours and 1 measurement per hour are taken during the person's usual night time hours. The average value of at least 14 measurements taken during the person's usual waking hours and average of at least 8 measurements taken during the person's usual sleeping hours were used for calculation of mean value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=67 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=56 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=12 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
88.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
87.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.8
|
82.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.1
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4 Years Post Denervation
4 years
|
80.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
80.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.4
|
78.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 4 years
|
-8.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.6
|
-6.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.5
|
-4.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 5 yearsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurements were taken according to Standard Joint National Committee VII Guidelines / ESC and ESH Guidelines at each follow-up visit. In the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the blood pressure of patient was measured every 30 minutes during the daytime and every 60 minutes during the night time. When using ABP, it was ensured that at least two measurements per hour are taken during the person's usual waking hours and 1 measurement per hour are taken during the person's usual night time hours. The average value of at least 14 measurements taken during the person's usual waking hours and average of at least 8 measurements taken during the person's usual sleeping hours were used for calculation of mean value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=50 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=35 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=10 Participants
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 5 Years Post Denervation
Baseline
|
87.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
87.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.6
|
83.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.8
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 5 Years Post Denervation
5 years
|
79.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.7
|
78.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.1
|
76.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.4
|
|
Mean Change in Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 5 Years Post Denervation
Change from baseline to 5 years
|
-7.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
-9.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
-7.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
Adverse Events
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=147 participants at risk
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=101 participants at risk
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=28 participants at risk
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Hearing loss
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Unstable Angina
|
3.4%
5/147 • Number of events 7 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 6 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
SVC Syndrome
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Second Degree Heart Block
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus Bradycardia/Sinus Bradycardia (Cardiac Arrhythmia)
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina Pectoris
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 6 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Anterior Myocardial Infarction
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Aortic Valve Stenosis
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Fibrillation
|
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 4 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Flutter
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrest
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiomyopathy
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Carotid Aneurysm-Aneurysm Of Left Internal Carotid Artery
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Chest Pain
|
4.8%
7/147 • Number of events 7 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 4 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Congestive Heart Failure
|
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary Artery Disease
|
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Decompensated Heart Failure
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
First Degree Heart/AV Block/Cardiac Arrhythmia - 1st degree AV Block
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Heart Failure
|
2.7%
4/147 • Number of events 5 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 4 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
3.4%
5/147 • Number of events 8 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 5 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial Effusion
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericarditis
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Right Ventricular Failure
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
ST Segment Changes
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal Tear
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Acute Abdomen
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticulitis
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Bleeding
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Perforated Appendix
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Fall
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Headache
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Lacerations
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Melena
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Other-Bladder
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Other-Death
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Other-Death Of Unknown Cause
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Other-Hemorrhagic Lymphocele
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Other-Non-Specifc Acute Lung Injury
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Shock
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Syncope
|
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Vertigo
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute Pancreatitis
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteremia
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial Infections
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial Infections of the Skin
|
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chlamydial Pneumonia
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cholecystitis
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infected Cyst
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia in the Compromised Host
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Allergic Dye Reaction
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
In-Stent Restenosis
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes Mellitus
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalemia
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Ankle Fracture
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Calf Pain
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Disc Protrusion
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hip Fracture
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendon Tear
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cancer
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon Cancer
|
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Kidney Tumor
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Melanoma
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic Cancer
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemiparesis/Weakness
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemorrhagic Stroke
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischemic Stroke
|
2.7%
4/147 • Number of events 4 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lumbar Spondylosis
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure/Convulsions/Epilepsy
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Stroke
|
4.8%
7/147 • Number of events 9 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)
|
4.1%
6/147 • Number of events 6 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute Renal Failure
|
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Chronic Renal Failure
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Kidney Pain/Flank Pain
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Congestion-Urinary Obstruction-Renal Congestion
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Failure
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteral Dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral Dysfunction
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Retention
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Tract Infections
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute Pulmonary Edema
|
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Common Cold/Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Mediastinitis
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary Embolism
|
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cutaneous Abcesses
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial Hypertension/Hypertension
|
6.8%
10/147 • Number of events 12 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 7 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive Crisis
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral Arterial Occlusion
|
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Renal Artery Dissection
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Renal Artery Stenosis
|
4.1%
6/147 • Number of events 6 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 4 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Renovascular Hypertension
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombus
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
VASC Bleeding
|
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
VASC Hematoma
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
VASC Pseudoaneurysm
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vasospasm
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemias
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Bleeding
|
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Trauma
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
A - EnligHTN for Severe Resistant HTN
n=147 participants at risk
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥160 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
B - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN
n=101 participants at risk
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated GFR ≥45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
C - EnligHTN for Resistant HTN & CKD
n=28 participants at risk
* Office systolic Blood Pressure ≥140 mmHg
* Participant is taking ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications (including 1 diuretic), or participant has documented drug intolerance to 2 or more of the 4 major classes of anti-hypertensives (ACE/ARB, Calcium Channel Blockers, Beta Blockers, or diuretic) and is unable to take 3 anti-hypertensive drugs.
* Participant has an estimated ≥15 GFR \<45 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
EnligHTN: Renal artery ablation with EnligHTN system used for all groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sick Sinus Syndrome
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus Bradycardia/Sinus Bradycardia (Cardiac Arrhythmia)
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Bleed
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colon Polyps
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal Hernia
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.7%
4/147 • Number of events 4 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Discomfort
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Dizziness
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Edema
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Elective Procedure
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Elective Surgery
|
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 4 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Headache
|
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Numbness-Numbness In Right Thigh
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Other-Small Wedge Shaped Abnormalities In Both Kidneys In Keeping With Small Infarcts
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina Pectoris
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary Artery Disease
|
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Heart Failure
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Mobitz II Block
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis/Degenerative Joint Disease
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Benign Mass
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast Cancer
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Numbness
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Stroke
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Product Issues
Device Malposition or Malfunction
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Abnormal Renal Function
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Kidney Pain/Flank Pain
|
3.4%
5/147 • Number of events 5 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Failure
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Retention
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostate Disease
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chest Tightness
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinusitis
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic Dissection
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hematoma
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic Hypotension
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Renal Artery Stenosis
|
4.8%
7/147 • Number of events 8 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
VASC Bleeding
|
2.7%
4/147 • Number of events 4 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
VASC Bruise
|
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
VASC Drainage
|
6.1%
9/147 • Number of events 9 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
VASC Hematoma
|
3.4%
5/147 • Number of events 5 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 5 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
VASC Pain
|
4.8%
7/147 • Number of events 7 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 6 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
VASC Pseudoaneurysm
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
VASC Vessel Perforation
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vaso Vagal Response
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vasospasm
|
10.2%
15/147 • Number of events 17 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
11.9%
12/101 • Number of events 17 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 2 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonitis
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hip Pain
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Low Back Pain
|
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 3 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/101 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Twitch
|
0.00%
0/147 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/28 • 5 years
Among the 353 subjects who were screened initially, 66 subjects did not receive the renal artery ablation procedure, 11 subjects received procedure but did not satisfy the definition of any arm. The 11 subjects who received RND procedure were followed up for exploratory analysis and considered as "unassigned arm". Of these subjects, 5 subjects completed the study, 6 subjects were withdrawn prior to study completion. Hence they were excluded during the endpoint and safety analyses.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place