Evaluate the Safety And Efficacy of the Transradial Coronary in Comparison With the Transfemoral Coronary Intervention

NCT ID: NCT01704911

Last Updated: 2012-10-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1700 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the DRAGON clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the transradial coronary intervention (TRI) in comparison with the transfemoral coronary intervention (TFI).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Historically, performing PCI requires making an access to the peripheral arteries by an arterial puncture or cutting down. This may lead to the serious bleeding complications especially under the situation of dual antiplatelet therapy and/or potent anti-coagulation therapies. TRI is now widely accepted as the most promising alternative for TFI around the world. It is supposed to reduce the incidence of the serious bleeding complication during and after PCI, as well as the total medical cost. There have been several prospective randomized trials comparing the safety and efficacy between TRI and TFI, but none of them had enough power to show the statistically valid equivalence in the efficacy between TRI and TFI. In this study, investigators randomize approximately 1,700 patients into TRI or TFI. Investigators adopt the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACCE) at 1 year as the primary efficacy endpoint for the study. Based on these rates at 1 year, the sample size for the non-inferiority analysis for the primary efficacy endpoint is calculated. Through this randomization trial, investigators can achieve the scientific evidence for the improved safety and equal efficacy of TRI compared to TFI. This trial has enough statistical power to draw the final conclusion in the debate between TRI and TFI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Free Rate of Cardiac or Cerebrovascular Events Transradial-transfemoral Coronary Interventions Comparison

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Transradial Transfemoral Coronary Intervention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transradial Coronary Intervention

Transradial Coronary Intervention

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transradial Coronary Intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Coronary Stent System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Any kind of coronary stent system

Transfemoral Coronary Intervention

Transfemoral Coronary Intervention

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transfemoral Coronary Intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Coronary Stent System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Any kind of coronary stent system

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transradial Coronary Intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transfemoral Coronary Intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Coronary Stent System

Any kind of coronary stent system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient must be at least 18 years of age.
* Patient is able to verbally acknowledge an understanding of the associated risks, benefits and treatment alternatives and he or his legally authorized representative provides signed informed consent prior to the randomization, as approved by the appropriate IEC.
* Patient must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable or unstable angina, silent ischemia, positive functional study or a reversible changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia).
* Patient must be an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
* Allen test is required for suitable candidate.
* Patient must agree to undergo all protocol-required follow-up examinations.
* Patient must agree not to participate in any other clinical study within the duration of this trial.
* Target lesion must be able to be treated by using six-French guiding catheters.
* Target lesion can be de Novo or restenotic.
* The target lesion can be stable or unstable.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient has received a heart transplant or any other organ transplant or is on a waiting list for any organ transplant.
* Patient is receiving or scheduled to receive chemotherapy for malignancy within 30 days prior to or after the procedure.
* Patient is receiving immunosuppression therapy or has known immunosuppressive or autoimmune disease (e.g. Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Lupus etc.).
* Patient has extensive peripheral vascular disease that precludes safe 6 French sheath insertion.
* Patient has other medical illness (e.g., cancer or congestive heart failure) that may cause non-compliance with the protocol, confound the data interpretation or is associated with a limited life expectancy (i.e., less than one year).
* Female patients of childbearing potential who have refused a urine or blood pregnancy test (to be done within 7 days prior to index procedure), patients who are nursing at the time of index procedure and those patients who do not agree at the time of consent to use any approved form of birth control up to and including the follow-up at 1 year.
* The target lesion is considered not to be treated by using six-French guiding catheters.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking University First Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Terumo Medical (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

CCRF Consulting Co., Ltd.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shigeru Saito, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Japan

Yong Huo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peking University First Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Peking University First Hospital

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yong HUO, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 861084059198

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yong Huo, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DRAGON

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id