Trial Outcomes & Findings for Computed Optical Margin Assessment for Breast Cancer Surgery, Phase I (Part A) (NCT NCT01699867)
NCT ID: NCT01699867
Last Updated: 2015-01-06
Results Overview
In this study, a patient had "positive margins" if tumor was identified at the true margin (i.e., the final margin or new margin) surface of at least one specimen by histology (0 mm, "tumor on ink").
COMPLETED
50 participants
one week after surgery
2015-01-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Optical Coherence Tomography (Single-arm)
Specimens from all patients were evaluated by optical coherence tomography.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
50
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Optical Coherence Tomography (Single-arm)
Specimens from all patients were evaluated by optical coherence tomography.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Screening Failure
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Computed Optical Margin Assessment for Breast Cancer Surgery, Phase I (Part A)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Optical Coherence Tomography (Single-arm)
n=46 Participants
Specimens from all patients were evaluated by optical coherence tomography.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: one week after surgeryPopulation: Patients with positive margins (0 mm, "tumor on ink").
In this study, a patient had "positive margins" if tumor was identified at the true margin (i.e., the final margin or new margin) surface of at least one specimen by histology (0 mm, "tumor on ink").
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Optical Coherence Tomography (Single-arm)
n=8 Participants
Specimens from all patients were evaluated by optical coherence tomography.
|
|---|---|
|
Patients With All Positive Margins Correctly Identified With the Device
|
5 Patients w/ all positives identified
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: one week after surgeryPopulation: Patients with all negative margins (≥ 2 mm). On average, 5 out of 6 possible margins were analyzed per patient.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Optical Coherence Tomography (Single-arm)
n=35 Participants
Specimens from all patients were evaluated by optical coherence tomography.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Margins With False Positive Device Readings
|
1.32 False positive margins per patient
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
Adverse Events
All Patients (Single-arm)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place