Trial Outcomes & Findings for Gastrointestinal Myoelectric Activity Protocol, the G-Tech EEnG Protocol (NCT NCT01697397)
NCT ID: NCT01697397
Last Updated: 2025-09-30
Results Overview
All patients in the study received the investigational device for recording myoelectric signals. Patients had a variety of symptoms and diagnoses, among which the mean peak volume profiles for a group of subjects with gastroparesis (7 tests) and reflux disorder (9 tests) were identified and analyzed separately. Subjects were fed a 700 kCal meal 60 minutes into the test. Time-dependent peaks in the frequency spectra were identified and volumes (height x width x duration) were calculated from data obtained in 101 tests of FGID patients and controls. Peaks were associated with each of the digestive organs in frequency ranges as follows for stomach: 2-4 cycles per min. (cpm); small intestine: 5-12 cpm; and colon: 12-25 cpm. The patches measure the myoelectric voltage present at the skin surface to determine the motor activity of each organ. The unit of measure for the activity is (mV)\*\*2 X Hz. This is a standard measurement used in frequency spectrum analysis.
COMPLETED
88 participants
Up to 4 hours at time of procedure
2025-09-30
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Investigational Device Arm
88 individuals were studied. Of the 88 individuals, 77 with FGID symptoms (constipation, diarrhea, pain, bloating) and 11 nominally healthy controls were studied. Data from the subjects were normalized to allow quantitative comparisons. Peaks in the frequency spectrum presumably due to motor activity were algorithmically identified and their total volume calculated. This was performed for the pre-prandial hour, a post-prandial 40-minute period and the final hour.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
88
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
88
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Gastrointestinal Myoelectric Activity Protocol, the G-Tech EEnG Protocol
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Investigational Device Arm
n=88 Participants
88 individuals participated in this study. Data from all the subjects were normalized to allow quantitative comparisons. Peaks in the frequency spectrum presumably due to motor activity were algorithmically identified and their total volume calculated. This was performed for the pre-prandial hour, a post-prandial 40-minute period and the final hour.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
48.9 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race - Asian
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race - Caucasian
|
68 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race - Hispanic or Latino
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
88 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants with FGID symptoms and those who denied having FGID symptoms
FGID Symptoms present
|
77 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants with FGID symptoms and those who denied having FGID symptoms
FGID symptoms absent (healthy controls)
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 4 hours at time of procedureAll patients in the study received the investigational device for recording myoelectric signals. Patients had a variety of symptoms and diagnoses, among which the mean peak volume profiles for a group of subjects with gastroparesis (7 tests) and reflux disorder (9 tests) were identified and analyzed separately. Subjects were fed a 700 kCal meal 60 minutes into the test. Time-dependent peaks in the frequency spectra were identified and volumes (height x width x duration) were calculated from data obtained in 101 tests of FGID patients and controls. Peaks were associated with each of the digestive organs in frequency ranges as follows for stomach: 2-4 cycles per min. (cpm); small intestine: 5-12 cpm; and colon: 12-25 cpm. The patches measure the myoelectric voltage present at the skin surface to determine the motor activity of each organ. The unit of measure for the activity is (mV)\*\*2 X Hz. This is a standard measurement used in frequency spectrum analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Individuals Without FGID Symptoms (Healthy Controls)
n=88 Participants
11 individuals who denied FGID symptoms served as healthy controls
|
Individuals With Gastroparesis
Among the subjects with FGIDs, there were 7 tests conducted with individuals diagnosed with gastroparesis.
|
Individuals With Reflux Disorder
9 individuals were studied having been diagnosed with a reflux disorder
|
Individuals With Bloating
12 Individuals studied were diagnosed with bloating.
|
Individuals With Constipation
30 individuals studied were diagnosed with constipation.
|
Individuals With Diarrhea
18 individuals studies were diagnosed with diarrhea.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Device Success Defined as the Ability to Record Myoelectric Signals in Study Subjects.
|
88 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 4 hours at time of procedurePopulation: Among the subjects studied, a sub group of subjects reported having gastroparesis and reflux disorders. These subjects were analyzed as separate groups and compared to the subjects who denied having any gastrointestinal disorders.
The study was not powered to analyze the differences for the FGID conditions of constipation and diarrhea, but was for a group of subjects with gastroparesis and reflux disorder. For these two groups, the mean myoelectrical activity in the stomach, small intestine, and colon were calculated and compared to that of the health controls.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Individuals Without FGID Symptoms (Healthy Controls)
n=11 Participants
11 individuals who denied FGID symptoms served as healthy controls
|
Individuals With Gastroparesis
n=7 Participants
Among the subjects with FGIDs, there were 7 tests conducted with individuals diagnosed with gastroparesis.
|
Individuals With Reflux Disorder
n=10 Participants
9 individuals were studied having been diagnosed with a reflux disorder
|
Individuals With Bloating
n=12 Participants
12 Individuals studied were diagnosed with bloating.
|
Individuals With Constipation
n=30 Participants
30 individuals studied were diagnosed with constipation.
|
Individuals With Diarrhea
n=18 Participants
18 individuals studies were diagnosed with diarrhea.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Secondary Efficacy Outcome
Stomach Preprandial myoelectrical activity
|
2.14 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
0.75 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
0.78 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
1.24 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
1.89 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 1.88
|
1.61 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Outcome
Stomach Postprandial myoelectrical activity 1st hr
|
4.75 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 2.82
|
1.54 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
5.16 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 4.90
|
5.02 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 5.68
|
8.62 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 15.67
|
3.53 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 2.79
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Outcome
Stomach Postprandial myoelectrical activity 2nd hr
|
7.39 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 8.00
|
1.57 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
11.41 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 20.70
|
9.29 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 17.40
|
7.19 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 5.75
|
3.91 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 3.06
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Outcome
Intestine Preprandial myoelectrical activity
|
16.27 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 15.16
|
7.68 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 6.09
|
10.24 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 8.67
|
12.04 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 9.39
|
11.49 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 6.72
|
14.55 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 9.94
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Outcome
Intestine Postprandial myoelectrical activity 2nd hr
|
20.18 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 10.49
|
10.03 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 8.54
|
15.28 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 6.88
|
20.76 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 11.42
|
14.33 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 7.42
|
19.17 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 15.49
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Outcome
Colon Preprandial myoelectrical activity
|
3.32 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 3.81
|
4.39 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 4.05
|
8.60 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 14.54
|
9.24 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 11.91
|
7.50 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 8.98
|
6.43 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 7.25
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Outcome
Colon Postprandial myoelectrical activity 1st hr
|
5.25 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 2.42
|
11.83 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 12.43
|
3.98 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 4.02
|
4.49 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
5.01 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 6.24
|
10.68 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 13.78
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Outcome
Colon Postprandial myoelectrical activity 2nd hr
|
7.24 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 4.26
|
9.26 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 6.60
|
3.81 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
8.20 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 4.84
|
8.28 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 9.28
|
7.39 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 9.07
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Outcome
Intestine Postprandial myoelectrical activity 1st hr
|
24.46 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 11.55
|
9.38 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 5.94
|
16.36 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 8.78
|
24.01 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 15.06
|
16.87 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 8.11
|
21.79 (mV)^2 x Hz
Standard Deviation 14.80
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 4 hours at time of procedureAssess and record anticipated adverse events (AEs), unanticipated adverse device effects (UADEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs) at time of recording
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Individuals Without FGID Symptoms (Healthy Controls)
n=88 Participants
11 individuals who denied FGID symptoms served as healthy controls
|
Individuals With Gastroparesis
Among the subjects with FGIDs, there were 7 tests conducted with individuals diagnosed with gastroparesis.
|
Individuals With Reflux Disorder
9 individuals were studied having been diagnosed with a reflux disorder
|
Individuals With Bloating
12 Individuals studied were diagnosed with bloating.
|
Individuals With Constipation
30 individuals studied were diagnosed with constipation.
|
Individuals With Diarrhea
18 individuals studies were diagnosed with diarrhea.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Anticipated, Un-Anticipated, and Serious Adverse Events
|
0 adverse events
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Investigational Device Arm
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place