First-Line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition Factor (MET) - Positive Gastric, Lower Esophageal, or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma

NCT ID: NCT01697072

Last Updated: 2016-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

609 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study of epirubicin, cisplatin \& capecitabine (ECX) with rilotumumab or placebo for untreated advanced MET-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rilotumumab

Rilotumumab (15 mg/kg, IV every 21 days) plus Epirubicin, Cisplatin and Capecitabine (ECX)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rilotumumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Rilotumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody immunoglobulin G, type 2 (IgG2) against human hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) that blocks binding of HGF/SF to its receptor MET, inhibiting HGF/MET-driven activities in cells.

Epirubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Epirubicin is an anthracycline cytotoxic agent.

Cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Cisplatin is a non-cell cycle specific chemotherapeutic agent.

Capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine.

Placebo

Rilotumumab-placebo (15 mg/kg, IV every 21 days) plus Epirubicin, Cisplatin and Capecitabine (ECX)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Placebo

Epirubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Epirubicin is an anthracycline cytotoxic agent.

Cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Cisplatin is a non-cell cycle specific chemotherapeutic agent.

Capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rilotumumab

Rilotumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody immunoglobulin G, type 2 (IgG2) against human hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) that blocks binding of HGF/SF to its receptor MET, inhibiting HGF/MET-driven activities in cells.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Epirubicin

Epirubicin is an anthracycline cytotoxic agent.

Intervention Type DRUG

Cisplatin

Cisplatin is a non-cell cycle specific chemotherapeutic agent.

Intervention Type DRUG

Capecitabine

Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AMG102 sterile protein-free solution Ellence Pharmorubicin PFS Pharmorubicin RDF Platinol Platinol-AQ Xeloda

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pathologically confirmed unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma •Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 or 1)
* Tumor MET-positive by immunohistochemistry (IHC)
* Evaluable (measurable or non-measurable) disease by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria

Exclusion Criteria

* Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) -overexpressing locally advanced or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma •Previous systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma
* Less than 6 months have elapsed from completion of prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy to randomization
* Previous treatment with anthracyclines must not exceed total cumulative dose of epirubicin of 400 mg/m2
* Squamous cell histology
* Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 50%
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amgen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pueblo, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Woodbury, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bedford, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Tweed Heads, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Douglas, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Kurralta Park, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Ringwood East, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Charleroi, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Shumen, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Hořovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Århus C, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Bayonne, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Nice, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Périgueux, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

München, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

München, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Oldenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Schweinfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Heraklion - Crete, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Larissa, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Nea Kifissia, Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Pátrai, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Aviano PN, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Distrito Federal, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Toluca, State of Mexico, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Konin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Aveiro, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Guimarães, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Maria da Feira, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Vila Real, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Alba Iulia, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Lasi, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Ivanovo, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Krasnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Vladimir, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Bardejov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Poprad, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Trenčín, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Groenkloof, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Kraaifontein, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Terrassa, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

A Coruña, Galicia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Pamplona, Navarre, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Eskilstuna, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Bellinzona, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Chur, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Gaziantep, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kherson, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Lutsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Mariupol, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Sumy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Uzhhorod, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Guildford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Northwood, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Salisbury, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Sutton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Czechia Denmark France Germany Greece Hungary Italy Mexico Poland Portugal Romania Russia Slovakia South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey (Türkiye) Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Catenacci DVT, Tebbutt NC, Davidenko I, Murad AM, Al-Batran SE, Ilson DH, Tjulandin S, Gotovkin E, Karaszewska B, Bondarenko I, Tejani MA, Udrea AA, Tehfe M, De Vita F, Turkington C, Tang R, Ang A, Zhang Y, Hoang T, Sidhu R, Cunningham D. Rilotumumab plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine as first-line therapy in advanced MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (RILOMET-1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1467-1482. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30566-1. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28958504 (View on PubMed)

Doshi S, Gisleskog PO, Zhang Y, Zhu M, Oliner KS, Loh E, Perez Ruixo JJ. Rilotumumab exposure-response relationship in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jun 1;21(11):2453-61. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1661. Epub 2015 Feb 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25712685 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.amgentrials.com

AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-004923-11

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

20070622

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

First Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Cancer
NCT01980810 TERMINATED PHASE2