Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Observational Study of First-Line Capecitabine Based Chemotherapy in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (NCT NCT01696695)

NCT ID: NCT01696695

Last Updated: 2017-03-23

Results Overview

PFS was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) and is defined as the time from the first dose of indicated treatment to disease progression (PD) or death, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not progress or died while being followed were censored on the date of the last visit. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments were conservatively censored on the date of first study medication, which is PFS was assigned a value of 1 day. PD: at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm); progression of existing non-target lesions; or presence of new lesions. Median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

882 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first, evaluated up to Day 1254

Results posted on

2017-03-23

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma (mCRC) Participants
Newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) participants, who received first line capecitabine based chemotherapy according to effective official Summary of Product Characteristics, were observed. The choice of therapy was based on exclusively the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
Overall Study
STARTED
882
Overall Study
COMPLETED
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
882

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma (mCRC) Participants
Newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) participants, who received first line capecitabine based chemotherapy according to effective official Summary of Product Characteristics, were observed. The choice of therapy was based on exclusively the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
Overall Study
Disease progression
373
Overall Study
Death
29
Overall Study
Adverse Event
74
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
92
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
48
Overall Study
Other
74
Overall Study
Major Protocol Violation
192

Baseline Characteristics

An Observational Study of First-Line Capecitabine Based Chemotherapy in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
mCRC Participants
n=690 Participants
Newly diagnosed mCRC participants, who received first line capecitabine based chemotherapy according to effective official Summary of Product Characteristics, were observed. The choice of therapy was based on exclusively the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
Age, Continuous
64.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.51 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
289 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
401 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first, evaluated up to Day 1254

Population: ITT Population

PFS was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) and is defined as the time from the first dose of indicated treatment to disease progression (PD) or death, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not progress or died while being followed were censored on the date of the last visit. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments were conservatively censored on the date of first study medication, which is PFS was assigned a value of 1 day. PD: at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm); progression of existing non-target lesions; or presence of new lesions. Median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
mCRC Participants
n=690 Participants
Newly diagnosed mCRC participants, who received first line capecitabine based chemotherapy according to effective official Summary of Product Characteristics, were observed. The choice of therapy was based on exclusively the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)
254 Days
Interval 230.0 to 279.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first, evaluated up to Day 1254

Population: ITT Population. Here, number (n)= number of participants evaluable for the specified therapeutic regimen.

PFS was assessed using RECIST v1.1 and is defined as the time from the first dose of indicated treatment to PD or death, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not progress or died while being followed were censored on the date of the last visit. PD: at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm; progression of existing non-target lesions; or presence of new lesions. Median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
mCRC Participants
n=690 Participants
Newly diagnosed mCRC participants, who received first line capecitabine based chemotherapy according to effective official Summary of Product Characteristics, were observed. The choice of therapy was based on exclusively the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
PFS by Therapeutic Regimens
Capecitabine monotherapy (n=246)
194 Days
Interval 176.0 to 224.0
PFS by Therapeutic Regimens
Capecitabine + bevacizumab (n=25)
391 Days
Interval 129.0 to
Only 1-sided confidence interval was planned to be calculated for this regimen.
PFS by Therapeutic Regimens
Capecitabine + irinotecan (n=106)
242 Days
Interval 177.0 to 276.0
PFS by Therapeutic Regimens
Capecitabine + irinotecan + bevacizumab (n= 91)
392 Days
Interval 316.0 to 525.0
PFS by Therapeutic Regimens
Capecitabine + oxaliplatin (n=173)
240 Days
Interval 206.0 to 291.0
PFS by Therapeutic Regimens
Capecitabine + oxaliplatin + bevacizumab (n= 49)
392 Days
Interval 210.0 to 442.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first, evaluated up to Day 1254

Population: ITT population.

Overall response is defined as a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) as determined by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1 on 2 consecutive occasions at least 6 weeks apart. Participants were evaluated for tumor response per RECIST v1.1 and assessed by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI):CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis less than (\<) 10 mm). No new lesions.PR was defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
mCRC Participants
n=690 Participants
Newly diagnosed mCRC participants, who received first line capecitabine based chemotherapy according to effective official Summary of Product Characteristics, were observed. The choice of therapy was based on exclusively the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response as Assessed by Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
24.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 27.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first, evaluated up to Day 1254

Population: ITT Population.

Clinical benefit was defined as having a confirmed CR, PR or stable disease (SD) for at least 24 weeks on study according to RECIST v1.1.CR: complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease,with the exception of nodal disease.All nodes,both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis \<10 mm).No new lesions.PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions.The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes,while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions.No unequivocal progression of non-target disease.No new lesions.SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD,taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.PD:at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions,or presence of new lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
mCRC Participants
n=690 Participants
Newly diagnosed mCRC participants, who received first line capecitabine based chemotherapy according to effective official Summary of Product Characteristics, were observed. The choice of therapy was based on exclusively the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit as Assessed Using RECIST v1.1
82.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 79.9 to 85.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to 1254 days

Population: ITT Population. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates the total number of participants who provided evaluable data for this outcome measure.

Metastasectomy is the surgical removal of metastases, which are secondary cancerous growths that have spread from cancer originating in another organ in the body.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
mCRC Participants
n=663 Participants
Newly diagnosed mCRC participants, who received first line capecitabine based chemotherapy according to effective official Summary of Product Characteristics, were observed. The choice of therapy was based on exclusively the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
Percentage of Participants Who Underwent Metastasectomy
6.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.4 to 8.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to 1254 days

Population: ITT Population. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates the total number of participants who provided evaluable data for this outcome measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
mCRC Participants
n=660 Participants
Newly diagnosed mCRC participants, who received first line capecitabine based chemotherapy according to effective official Summary of Product Characteristics, were observed. The choice of therapy was based on exclusively the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
Mean Duration of Capecitabine Therapy
188.8 Days
Standard Deviation 171.71

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to 1254 days

Population: ITT Population.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
mCRC Participants
n=690 Participants
Newly diagnosed mCRC participants, who received first line capecitabine based chemotherapy according to effective official Summary of Product Characteristics, were observed. The choice of therapy was based on exclusively the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
Percentage of Participants With Dose Modification of Capecitabine
85.6 Percentage of participants

Adverse Events

mCRC Participants

Serious events: 55 serious events
Other events: 140 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
mCRC Participants
n=882 participants at risk
Newly diagnosed mCRC participants, who received first line capecitabine based chemotherapy according to effective official Summary of Product Characteristics, were observed. The choice of therapy was based on exclusively the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
0.34%
3/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.23%
2/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Cardiac disorders
Heart failure
0.34%
3/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiopulmonary failure
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Melaena
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Bowel movement irregularity
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.34%
3/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
0.23%
2/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine perforatio
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Subileus
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Thrombosis mesenteric vessel
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
General disorders
Death
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice
0.23%
2/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Cachexia
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.23%
2/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral ischaemia
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral neuropathy
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Nervous system disorders
Paraparesis
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.45%
4/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cutaneous symptom
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndroma
0.23%
2/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Surgical and medical procedures
Nephrostomy
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Vascular disorders
Embolism
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Vascular disorders
thrombosis
0.11%
1/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
mCRC Participants
n=882 participants at risk
Newly diagnosed mCRC participants, who received first line capecitabine based chemotherapy according to effective official Summary of Product Characteristics, were observed. The choice of therapy was based on exclusively the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
11.1%
98/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome
5.8%
51/882 • Baseline up to Day 1254
Safety Population included all enrolled participants.

Additional Information

Medical Communications

Hoffmann-La Roche

Phone: 800-821-8590

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER