Patient Perspective on Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices
NCT ID: NCT01691586
Last Updated: 2018-06-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
600 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-04-13
2018-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of RPM + in-clinic follow-up versus in-clinic follow-up only on patient-reported health status and device-acceptance after implantation with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D).
Secondary objectives are (1) to identify subgroups of patients who prefer RPM over in-clinic visits or vice versa due to specific clinical and psychological factors and (2) To investigate the cost-effectiveness of RPM + in-clinic follow-up compared to in-clinic follow-up only.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
WeRoaM: Wearable Remote Monitoring in Heart Failure
NCT06969560
Effects of Remote Patient Monitoring on Heart Failure Management
NCT00778986
CHF Home Telemonitoring: A Home Telemonitoring Service for Chronic Heart Failure Patients on Trial
NCT02489370
Pulmonary Artery Sensor System Pressure Monitoring to Improve Heart Failure (HF) Outcomes
NCT04398654
A Trial of Telemonitoring in Adults With Heart Failure
NCT01393314
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Remote patient management
Remote patient management system + yearly in-clinic follow-up
Remote patient monitoring
Remote monitoring of ICD and heart failure data
In-Clinic check-ups
Calender-based In-Clinic ICD check-up
In-Clinic follow-up
In-clinic follow-up according to standard practice (every 3-6 months)
In-Clinic check-ups
Calender-based In-Clinic ICD check-up
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remote patient monitoring
Remote monitoring of ICD and heart failure data
In-Clinic check-ups
Calender-based In-Clinic ICD check-up
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* left ventricular ejection fraction \<35%
* NYHA functional class II or III symptoms
* ICD/CRT-D device compatible with the LATITUDE(r) RPM system from Boston Scientific
Exclusion Criteria
* History of psychiatric illness others than affective/anxiety disorders
* Cognitive impairments
* Insufficient knowledge of the language to fill in the questionnaires
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boston Scientific Corporation
INDUSTRY
Tilburg University
OTHER
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
M. Meine
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mathias Meine, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UMC Utrecht
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
de Graaf G, Timmermans I, Meine M, Alings M, Pedersen SS, Mabo P, Zitron E, Redekop K, Versteeg H. Economic evaluation of remote monitoring of patients with an implantable cardiac defibrillator (REMOTE-CIED study). J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Aug;30(7):1173-1185. doi: 10.1177/1357633X221129176. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Chiu CSL, Timmermans I, Versteeg H, Zitron E, Mabo P, Pedersen SS, Meine M; REMOTE-CIED Trial Investigators. Effect of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes in European heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: secondary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trial. Europace. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):256-267. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab221.
Versteeg H, Timmermans I, Widdershoven J, Kimman GJ, Prevot S, Rauwolf T, Scholten MF, Zitron E, Mabo P, Denollet J, Pedersen SS, Meine M. Effect of remote monitoring on patient-reported outcomes in European heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: primary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trial. Europace. 2019 Sep 1;21(9):1360-1368. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz140.
Timmermans I, Meine M, Szendey I, Aring J, Romero Roldan J, van Erven L, Kahlert P, Zitron E, Mabo P, Denollet J, Versteeg H. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Patient experiences and preferences for follow-up. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;42(2):120-129. doi: 10.1111/pace.13574. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
Timmermans I, Versteeg H, Meine M, Pedersen SS, Denollet J. Illness perceptions in patients with heart failure and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Dimensional structure, validity, and correlates of the brief illness perception questionnaire in Dutch, French and German patients. J Psychosom Res. 2017 Jun;97:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UMCU.DHL.001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.