Patient Perspective on Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices

NCT ID: NCT01691586

Last Updated: 2018-06-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-13

Study Completion Date

2018-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A relatively new and promising development in the area of cardiovascular implantable electronic device therapy is remote patient monitoring (RPM). RPM systems can interrogate the device automatically and send the data from the patients' home to the physician, thereby reducing in-clinic follow-ups.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of RPM + in-clinic follow-up versus in-clinic follow-up only on patient-reported health status and device-acceptance after implantation with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D).

Secondary objectives are (1) to identify subgroups of patients who prefer RPM over in-clinic visits or vice versa due to specific clinical and psychological factors and (2) To investigate the cost-effectiveness of RPM + in-clinic follow-up compared to in-clinic follow-up only.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Congestive Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Remote patient management

Remote patient management system + yearly in-clinic follow-up

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Remote patient monitoring

Intervention Type DEVICE

Remote monitoring of ICD and heart failure data

In-Clinic check-ups

Intervention Type OTHER

Calender-based In-Clinic ICD check-up

In-Clinic follow-up

In-clinic follow-up according to standard practice (every 3-6 months)

Group Type OTHER

In-Clinic check-ups

Intervention Type OTHER

Calender-based In-Clinic ICD check-up

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Remote patient monitoring

Remote monitoring of ICD and heart failure data

Intervention Type DEVICE

In-Clinic check-ups

Calender-based In-Clinic ICD check-up

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Boston Scientific LATITUDE system

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* first time ICD/CRT-D implanted at one of the participating centers
* left ventricular ejection fraction \<35%
* NYHA functional class II or III symptoms
* ICD/CRT-D device compatible with the LATITUDE(r) RPM system from Boston Scientific

Exclusion Criteria

* On the waiting list for heart transplantation
* History of psychiatric illness others than affective/anxiety disorders
* Cognitive impairments
* Insufficient knowledge of the language to fill in the questionnaires
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boston Scientific Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tilburg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

UMC Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

M. Meine

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mathias Meine, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UMC Utrecht

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Center Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

de Graaf G, Timmermans I, Meine M, Alings M, Pedersen SS, Mabo P, Zitron E, Redekop K, Versteeg H. Economic evaluation of remote monitoring of patients with an implantable cardiac defibrillator (REMOTE-CIED study). J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Aug;30(7):1173-1185. doi: 10.1177/1357633X221129176. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36245363 (View on PubMed)

Chiu CSL, Timmermans I, Versteeg H, Zitron E, Mabo P, Pedersen SS, Meine M; REMOTE-CIED Trial Investigators. Effect of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes in European heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: secondary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trial. Europace. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):256-267. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab221.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34410384 (View on PubMed)

Versteeg H, Timmermans I, Widdershoven J, Kimman GJ, Prevot S, Rauwolf T, Scholten MF, Zitron E, Mabo P, Denollet J, Pedersen SS, Meine M. Effect of remote monitoring on patient-reported outcomes in European heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: primary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trial. Europace. 2019 Sep 1;21(9):1360-1368. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz140.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31168604 (View on PubMed)

Timmermans I, Meine M, Szendey I, Aring J, Romero Roldan J, van Erven L, Kahlert P, Zitron E, Mabo P, Denollet J, Versteeg H. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Patient experiences and preferences for follow-up. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;42(2):120-129. doi: 10.1111/pace.13574. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30536931 (View on PubMed)

Timmermans I, Versteeg H, Meine M, Pedersen SS, Denollet J. Illness perceptions in patients with heart failure and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Dimensional structure, validity, and correlates of the brief illness perception questionnaire in Dutch, French and German patients. J Psychosom Res. 2017 Jun;97:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28606488 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UMCU.DHL.001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Heart at Home- a Self-care Study
NCT01759368 COMPLETED NA