Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of CNTO 136 (Sirukumab) Administered Subcutaneously in Japanese Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Unresponsive to Methotrexate or Sulfasalazine (NCT NCT01689532)
NCT ID: NCT01689532
Last Updated: 2016-10-27
Results Overview
A TEAE was defined as an event that occurred in the treatment period during which it emerged (that is \[i.e.\] started or worsened in severity, relation, or other attribute), and even if the event continued to be present.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
122 participants
Baseline upto Week 68
2016-10-27
Participant Flow
Of the 180 participants who signed informed consent of this study, 122 participants (61 participants in each treatment group) were randomized and treated during the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
61
|
61
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
47
|
52
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
9
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of CNTO 136 (Sirukumab) Administered Subcutaneously in Japanese Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Unresponsive to Methotrexate or Sulfasalazine
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
Total
n=122 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=5 Participants
|
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.16 • n=7 Participants
|
55.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.41 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
JAPAN
|
61 participants
n=5 Participants
|
61 participants
n=7 Participants
|
122 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline upto Week 68Population: Safety analyses set included all participants who received at least 1 (partial or complete) dose of the study drug.
A TEAE was defined as an event that occurred in the treatment period during which it emerged (that is \[i.e.\] started or worsened in severity, relation, or other attribute), and even if the event continued to be present.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
|
56 participants
|
58 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The ACR 20 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and \>=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 millimeter \[mm\], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, \[0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain\]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response
Week 16
|
77.0 percentage of participants
|
72.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response
Week 24
|
73.8 percentage of participants
|
82.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The ACR 50 Response is defined as \>=50 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and \>=50 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (0-10 mm, 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, \[0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain\]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI and serum CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response
Week 16
|
47.5 percentage of participants
|
57.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response
Week 24
|
49.2 percentage of participants
|
63.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The ACR 70 Response is defined as \>=70 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and \>=70 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (0-10 mm, 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, \[0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain\]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response
Week 16
|
26.2 percentage of participants
|
32.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response
Week 24
|
24.6 percentage of participants
|
36.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The ACR 90 Response is defined as \>=90 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and \>=90 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (0-10 mm, 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, \[0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain\]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 90 Response
Week 16
|
8.2 percentage of participants
|
11.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 90 Response
Week 24
|
6.6 percentage of participants
|
14.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
Sixty six (66) joints were assessed for swelling by investigator to determine the number of joints that were considered swollen. A negative change from baseline in swollen joint count indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Swollen Joints at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 16
|
-65.66 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.201
|
-73.84 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.162
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Swollen Joints at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-71.16 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.343
|
-75.82 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.860
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
Sixty eight (68) joints were assessed for tenderness to determine the number of joints that were considered tender. A negative change from baseline in the tender joint count indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Tender Joints at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 16
|
-63.95 percent change
Standard Deviation 41.738
|
-65.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 41.898
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Tender Joints at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-65.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 41.933
|
-67.34 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.145
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
Participants assessed their average pain during the past week on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst possible pain).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 16
|
-53.44 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.043
|
-52.94 percent change
Standard Deviation 44.384
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-52.45 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.266
|
-57.56 percent change
Standard Deviation 49.725
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
Participants rated their disease activity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 16
|
-50.64 percent change
Standard Deviation 48.679
|
-53.15 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.925
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-51.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 50.569
|
-56.94 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.208
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was assessed using the VAS on a scale of 0 (no arthritis activity) to 10 (extremely active arthritis).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-67.54 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.521
|
-68.44 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.161
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 16
|
-65.28 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.268
|
-66.17 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.774
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 to 3 (0=no difficulty and 3=inability to perform a task in that area). Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specific timepoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 16 (n= 59, 58)
|
-38.90 percent change
Standard Deviation 53.204
|
-46.18 percent change
Standard Deviation 48.572
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 24 (n= 59, 58)
|
-42.25 percent change
Standard Deviation 52.741
|
-48.98 percent change
Standard Deviation 44.917
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
Serum CRP is a marker of systemic inflammation. A negative percent change from baseline in CRP represents improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 16
|
-98.60 percent change
Standard Deviation 2.026
|
-98.97 percent change
Standard Deviation 1.637
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-98.64 percent change
Standard Deviation 2.148
|
-98.99 percent change
Standard Deviation 1.251
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
Major clinical response is achieving ACR 70 for 6 continuous months. The ACR 70 Response is defined as \>=70 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and \>=70 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (0-10 mm, 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS, (The scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, \[0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain\]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI and CRP. Achievement of major clinical response reflects an enhanced level of therapeutic efficacy and sustained reduction of signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Major Clinical Response at Week 52
|
13.1 percentage of participants
|
24.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The DAS28 based on C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is a statistically derived index combining tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), CRP and patient's global assessment of disease activity. The set of 28 joint count is based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. The values are 0=best to 10=worst. Good responders: improvement from baseline greater than (\>) 1.2 with DAS28 less than or equal to (\<=) 3.2; moderate responders: improvement from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or improvement from baseline \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \<=5.1; non-responders: improvement from baseline \<=0.6 or improvement from baseline \>0.6 and \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Index Score 28 (CRP) Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 24
|
88.5 percentage of participants
|
96.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Index Score 28 (CRP) Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 16
|
90.2 percentage of participants
|
96.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The DAS28 based on C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is a statistically derived index combining tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), CRP and patient's global assessment of disease activity. The set of 28 joint count is based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. DAS28 (CRP) remission is defined as a DAS28 (CRP) value of less than (\<) 2.6 at any study visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Week 24
|
49.2 percentage of participants
|
59.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The DAS28 based on C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is a statistically derived index combining tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), CRP and patient's global assessment of disease activity. The set of 28 joint count is based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. The values are 0=best to 10=worst.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 16
|
-2.858 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1867
|
-3.069 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1483
|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-2.949 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2445
|
-3.185 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1552
|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Baseline
|
5.566 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8088
|
5.805 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0553
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Weeks 16, 24 and 52Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The SDAI score is a derived score combining tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity on VAS, physician's global assessments of disease activity on VAS, and CRP. SDAI-based ACR/EULAR remission is defined as a SDAI value of \<=3.3 at the visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Based ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Remission at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Week 16
|
14.8 percentage of participants
|
19.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Based ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Remission at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Week 24
|
16.4 percentage of participants
|
18.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Based ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Remission at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Week 52
|
18.0 percentage of participants
|
26.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Weeks 16, 24 and 52Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The Boolean based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following 4 criteria at that visit are met: tender joint count (68 joints) \<=1; swollen joint count (66 joints) \<=1; CRP \<=1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL); and patient's global assessment of disease activity on visual analog scale (VAS) \<=1 on a 0 to 10 scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Boolean Based ACR/EULAR Remission at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Week 16
|
4.9 percentage of participants
|
14.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Boolean Based ACR/EULAR Remission at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Week 24
|
9.8 percentage of participants
|
8.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Boolean Based ACR/EULAR Remission at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Week 52
|
8.2 percentage of participants
|
13.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The CDAI score is a derived score combining tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and physician's global assessments of disease activity. The total score range is 0-76. Score interpretation: Remission \<=2.8; Low Disease Activity CDAI \> 2.8 and \<=10; Moderate Disease Activity CDAI \>10 and \<=22; High Disease Activity CDAI \> 22.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Baseline
|
31.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.454
|
35.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.923
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 16
|
-19.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.138
|
-22.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.231
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-20.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.207
|
-23.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.487
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The SDAI score is a derived score combining tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessments of disease activity, and CRP. The total score range is 0-86. Score interpretation: Remission SDAI \<=3.3; Low Disease Activity SDAI \>3.3 and \<=11; Moderate Disease Activity SDAI \>11 and \<=26; High Disease Activity SDAI \>26.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Baseline
|
34.318 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.6078
|
38.911 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.7996
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 16
|
-22.365 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.4411
|
-25.896 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.9910
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-23.206 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.6842
|
-27.064 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.2368
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, at Week 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living), each scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task in that area). Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 16 and 24
Baseline
|
1.3484 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65396
|
1.1721 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64111
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 16 and 24
Change at Week 16
|
-0.5676 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.53695
|
-0.4980 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61343
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 16 and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-0.5738 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54600
|
-0.5697 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56758
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living), each scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task in that area). HAQ-DI response was defined as change of \> -0.22 from baseline in HAQ-DI score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving HAQ-DI Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 16
|
75.4 percentage of participants
|
67.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving HAQ-DI Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 24
|
73.8 percentage of participants
|
70.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline upto Week 52Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living), each scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task in that area). HAQ-DI responders who maintain a change from baseline of \> -0.22 in HAQ-DI score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Maintaining HAQ-DI Response
|
70.5 percentage of participants
|
65.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
HAQ-DI consisted of 20-question in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living), each scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task in that area). Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. AUC of change from baseline in HAQ-DI score is the AUC of change from baseline in HAQ-DI score versus the time. AUC was calculated based on the measurement (i.e., observed HAQ-DI score change from baseline) at scheduled visits using the trapezoidal rule. Functional status was determined as a cumulative measure of HAQ-DI over 1 year by using the AUC of the change from baseline in HAQ-DI score through week 52. Decreases in AUC of change from baseline in HAQ-DI indicate a greater average improvement in physical function over time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under Curve (AUC) of Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score From Week 0 Through Week 24 and From Week 0 Through Week 52
Week 0 Through Week 24
|
-74.0645 units on a scale*week
Standard Deviation 78.34712
|
-69.2439 units on a scale*week
Standard Deviation 75.85153
|
|
Area Under Curve (AUC) of Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score From Week 0 Through Week 24 and From Week 0 Through Week 52
Week 0 Through Week 52
|
-189.2531 units on a scale*week
Standard Deviation 178.07291
|
-187.4068 units on a scale*week
Standard Deviation 191.77329
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
Duration of morning stiffness was defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes (If none was present = 0; If morning stiffness was continuing at the time of assessment or was unusual compared to the recent past, average of duration of stiffness over the past 3 days was reported; If stiffness persisted the entire day, 1440 minutes was recorded). Negative values for this outcome measure represent improvement, i.e. shortening of duration of morning stiffness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 16
|
-103.8 minute
Standard Deviation 268.32
|
-160.4 minute
Standard Deviation 374.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Weeks 16 and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-77.6 minute
Standard Deviation 334.00
|
-169.4 minute
Standard Deviation 374.36
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16, 24 and 52Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The SF-36 is a survey of participant health. It consists of 8 individual domains, which are weighted sums of the questions in their section. The 8 domains are: vitality (VT), physical functioning (PF), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), Role-Physical (RP), Role-Emotional (RE), social functioning (SF) and mental health (MH). Each of these 8 scales (domains) is scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health. Based on the scale scores, the summary mental component score (MCS) is derived. Scales contributing most to the scoring of the SF-36 MCS include the VT, SF, RE and MH. Other domains not noted contribute to the scoring but to a lesser degree. The scoring is derived based on an algorithm that has been developed in a software provided by the developer. The summary MCS score is also scaled from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Change at Week 16 (MCS)
|
5.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.655
|
6.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.183
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Change at Week 52 (MCS)
|
6.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.681
|
6.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.915
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Baseline (Mental Component Score [MCS])
|
45.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.577
|
46.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.332
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Change at Week 24 (MCS)
|
5.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.376
|
6.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.273
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16, 24 and 52Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The SF-36 is a survey of participant health. It consists of 8 individual domains, which are weighted sums of the questions in their section. The 8 domains are: vitality (VT), physical functioning (PF), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), Role-Physical (RP), Role-Emotional (RE), social functioning (SF) and mental health (MH). Each of these 8 scales (domains) is scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health. Based on the scale scores, the summary physical component score (PCS) is derived. Scales contributing most to the scoring of the SF-36 PCS include the PF, RP, BP and GH. Other domains not noted contribute to the scoring but to a lesser degree. The scoring is derived based on an algorithm that has been developed in a software provided by the developer. The summary PCS score is also scaled from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Baseline (Physical Component Score [PCS])
|
22.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.315
|
24.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.642
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Change at Week 16 (PCS)
|
12.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.349
|
12.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.886
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Change at Week 24 (PCS)
|
12.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.979
|
14.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.290
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Change at Week 52 (PCS)
|
13.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.754
|
14.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.395
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16, 24 and 52Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical, VAS, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state and 100 representing the best imaginable health state. The EQ VAS is used as a quantitative measure of health outcome as judged by the individual participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Change at Week 16
|
30.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.145
|
25.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.371
|
|
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Change at Week 24
|
32.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.562
|
28.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.397
|
|
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Change at Week 52
|
33.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.972
|
31.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.666
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16, 24 and 52Population: All participants randomly assigned to a treatment group were included in the efficacy analysis regardless of whether they received the assigned treatment.
Change from Baseline to end point in Euro Quality of life (Qol)-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D). A higher score indicates an improvement in health in the Health Status Index. The EuroQol-5 is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing dead.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 Participants
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 Participants
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Index Score at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Change at Week 16
|
0.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.173
|
0.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.177
|
|
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Index Score at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Change at Week 24
|
0.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.169
|
0.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.172
|
|
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Index Score at Weeks 16, 24 and 52
Change at Week 52
|
0.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.164
|
0.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.166
|
Adverse Events
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
Sirukumab 100 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 participants at risk
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 participants at risk
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal Reflux Disease
|
0.00%
0/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large Intestine Polyp
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
0.00%
0/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hepatitis E
|
0.00%
0/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
0.00%
0/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Comminuted Fracture
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
0.00%
0/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral Disc Protrusion
|
0.00%
0/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Borderline Serous Tumour of Ovary
|
0.00%
0/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Schizophrenia
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
0.00%
0/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Endometriosis
|
0.00%
0/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Sirukumab 50 Milligram (mg)
n=61 participants at risk
Participants received sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, participants received placebo SC at Weeks 2, 6, and q4w through Week 52.
|
Sirukumab 100 mg
n=61 participants at risk
Participants received Sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
8.2%
5/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
4.9%
3/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Erythema
|
31.1%
19/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
32.8%
20/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Pruritus
|
11.5%
7/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
21.3%
13/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Swelling
|
16.4%
10/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
19.7%
12/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
8.2%
5/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
0.00%
0/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
6.6%
4/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
44.3%
27/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
44.3%
27/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
9.8%
6/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
3.3%
2/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
9.8%
6/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
11.5%
7/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea Pedis
|
6.6%
4/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin Abrasion
|
6.6%
4/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Investigations
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased
|
16.4%
10/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
16.4%
10/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased
|
14.8%
9/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
18.0%
11/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil Count Decreased
|
11.5%
7/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
6.6%
4/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Investigations
Platelet Count Decreased
|
14.8%
9/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
4.9%
3/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Investigations
White Blood Cell Count Decreased
|
11.5%
7/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
11.5%
7/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis Allergic
|
0.00%
0/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
6.6%
4/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
11.5%
7/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
11.5%
7/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
1.6%
1/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
6.6%
4/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
6.6%
4/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
4.9%
3/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
8.2%
5/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
11.5%
7/61 • Baseline up to Week 68
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested in writing, such publication will be withheld for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER