Oxycodone DETERx™ Versus Placebo in Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)

NCT ID: NCT01685684

Last Updated: 2020-10-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

740 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of Oxycodone DETERx compared with placebo in opioid-experienced and opioid-naive subjects with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain requiring around-the-clock opioid analgesia for an extended period of time.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oxycodone DETERx

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oxycodone DETERx

Intervention Type DRUG

40-160 mg total daily dose of oxycodone DETERx, divided into 2 doses, q12h

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo, divided into 2 doses, q12h

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oxycodone DETERx

40-160 mg total daily dose of oxycodone DETERx, divided into 2 doses, q12h

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo, divided into 2 doses, q12h

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or non-pregnant female 18-75 years of age (inclusive) at the time of consent.
* Must have a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe CLBP for a minimum of 6 months prior to screening.
* Must qualify for ATC opioid therapy for treatment of CLBP.
* Must be classified as non-malignant and non-neuropathic (Class 1 and 2), neuropathic (Class 3), or symptomatic for more than 6 months after low back pain surgery (Class 9) based on the Quebec Task Force Scale score.
* Female subjects of childbearing potential will use an acceptable method of birth control.
* Must be in general good health based on screening physical examination.
* Must be willing and able to comply with all study procedures and visit requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

* Known to be refractory or intolerant to the analgesic effects of opioids or have failed previous opioid therapy.
* A medical condition that would compromise the subject's ability to swallow, absorb, metabolize, or excrete the study drug, including (but not limited to) intractable nausea and/or vomiting and/or severe gastrointestinal narrowing (pathologic or iatrogenic), bowel obstruction, ileostomy, colostomy, or is suspected of having paralytic ileus.
* A surgical procedure for back pain within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit.
* Any other chronic pain condition other than CLBP that would interfere with the assessment of CLBP (e.g., osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-herpetic neuralgia, pain associated with diabetic neuropathy, fibromyalgia, migraine headaches requiring opioid therapy).
* Known history of major depressive disorder that is not controlled with medication or has other conditions that produce significant cognitive or emotional disability.
* Any clinically significant unstable medical abnormality or acute or chronic disease of the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, respiratory (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), hepatic, or renal systems.
* Known history of alcohol and/or drug abuse.
* Positive urine drug screen for illegal or non-prescribed drugs
* Known history of seizure disorder, epilepsy, convulsions, or increased intracranial pressure anytime during the subject's life except pediatric febrile seizures.
* Known history of head injury within 6 months of Screening Visit.
* Current malignancy or a history within past 2 years of malignancy, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ that have been successfully treated.
* Positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B surface antigen, or hepatitis C antibody
* Subject is not able or is unwilling to meet the study attendance requirements.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard Malamut, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

Cerritos, California, United States

Site Status

Escondido, California, United States

Site Status

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Napa, California, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Valparaiso, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Natick, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Watertown, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Pascagoula, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Berlin, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Williamsville, New York, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

New Tazewell, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Orem, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Katz N, Kopecky EA, O'Connor M, Brown RH, Fleming AB. A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety, tolerability, and efficacy study of Xtampza ER in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain. Pain. 2015 Dec;156(12):2458-2467. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000315.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26262828 (View on PubMed)

Kopecky EA, Vaughn B, Lagasse S, O'Connor M. Tolerability, Safety, and Effectiveness of Oxycodone DETERx in Elderly Patients >/=65 Years of Age with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Drugs Aging. 2017 Aug;34(8):603-613. doi: 10.1007/s40266-017-0473-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28600725 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CP-OXYDET-08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Phase 2 Chronic Low Back Pain Study
NCT01364922 COMPLETED PHASE2
A Study of Pain Relief in Low Back Pain
NCT00325949 COMPLETED PHASE3
Abuse Potential Study of PF-00345439
NCT01986283 COMPLETED PHASE1