A Phase 2 Study of the IDO Inhibitor Epacadostat Versus Tamoxifen for Subjects With Biochemical-recurrent-only EOC, PPC or FTC Following Complete Remission With First-line Chemotherapy

NCT ID: NCT01685255

Last Updated: 2019-03-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

83 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Study Completion Date

2014-10-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is an open-label, randomized, phase 2 study of an IDO inhibitor, INCB024360 (epacadostat) versus tamoxifen in biochemical recurrent only ovarian cancer patients following complete remission with first-line chemotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Cancer Genitourinary (GU) Tumors

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Epacadostat

Subjects randomized to Arm A (epacadostat) will take epacadostat tablets at a dose of 600 mg BID, beginning on Day 1.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Epacadostat

Intervention Type DRUG

Tamoxifen

Subjects randomized to Arm B (tamoxifen) will take tamoxifen tablets at a dose of 20 mg BID, beginning on Day 1.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tamoxifen

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Epacadostat

Intervention Type DRUG

tamoxifen

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

INCB024360

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects who have received first-line chemotherapy, which must have been a platinum-containing regimen.
* Subjects who received maintenance paclitaxel or, bevacizumab, or alternative maintenance therapy (e.g. vaccines) are eligible for enrollment provided they have discontinued therapy at least 4 weeks for prior taxane and, at least 8 weeks for bevacizumab, or received medical monitor approval for time lapse from alternative maintenance therapy prior to randomization and recovered from toxicities to less than Grade 2.
* Subject must be currently in remission by clinical and radiological criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors \[RECIST 1.1\]).

a. If a PET scan or high-resolution CT scan is performed and demonstrates new disease \</= 1 cm, these subjects would be eligible.
* Clinical remission is defined as: asymptomatic and a negative physical examination.
* Scans are required post completion of platinum-containing therapy to document disease remission.
* Prior to the first-line regimen, CA 125 must have been elevated at first diagnosis, must have normalized with the first-line therapy/regimen, and is currently elevated:

a. CA 125 elevation is defined as 2 consecutive measurements that are both above the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at least 42 weeks apart, with the second measure showing further increases from the first measurement
1. If CA 125 is ≥ 2 × ULN the confirmatory value only needs to be 1 week apart.
2. CA 125 elevation is defined as a value that is at least 2 × ULN on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart (UK ONLY REQUIREMENT).
* CA 125 elevation must be at least 3 months from completion of first-line platinum-containing regimen.
* Documentation of at least 1 normal CA 125 level at approximately 3 months during or following first line therapy is required.
* Subjects must have available archived tumor tissue.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
* Adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function based on screening laboratory assessments.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with any evidence of new disease (\> 1 cm) including new ascites as confirmed by imaging.
* Any other prior antitumor systemic therapy except for first-line chemotherapy associated with previous CA 125 normalization or maintenance paclitaxel, bevacizumab, or alternative maintenance therapy as approved by the medical monitor.
* Subjects with prior radiotherapy within 3 months of randomization and have not recovered from all radiotherapy-related toxicities, who have received radiation therapy to the chest within 3 months of randomization, or who have a history or radiation pneumonitis.
* Subjects with protocol-specified active autoimmune processes except vitiligo or thyroiditis.
* Subjects receiving investigational study drug for any indication, immunological-based treatment for any reason (except completed adjuvant therapy with medical monitor approval), or potent CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors.
* Subjects receiving monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) within the 21 days prior to screening; subjects who have ever had Serotonin Syndrome (SS) after receiving 1 or more serotonergic drugs.
* Subjects for whom tamoxifen therapy is contraindicated.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Incyte Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lance Leopold, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Incyte Corporation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Joliet, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Covington, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Bridgewater, New York, United States

Site Status

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Abington, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bendigo, , Australia

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Australia

Site Status

Herston, , Australia

Site Status

Milton, , Australia

Site Status

Randwick, , Australia

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Izhevsk, , Russia

Site Status

Krasnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Kursk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Orenburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Chernivtsi, , Ukraine

Site Status

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lutsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Bebington, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Keighley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

West Midlands, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada Russia Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kristeleit R, Davidenko I, Shirinkin V, El-Khouly F, Bondarenko I, Goodheart MJ, Gorbunova V, Penning CA, Shi JG, Liu X, Newton RC, Zhao Y, Maleski J, Leopold L, Schilder RJ. A randomised, open-label, phase 2 study of the IDO1 inhibitor epacadostat (INCB024360) versus tamoxifen as therapy for biochemically recurrent (CA-125 relapse)-only epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal carcinoma, or fallopian tube cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Sep;146(3):484-490. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28698009 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

INCB 24360-210

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.