Ideal Frequency of Postoperative High Volume Saline Irrigations Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
NCT ID: NCT01680705
Last Updated: 2014-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-07-31
2014-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
CRS has an estimated prevalence of 5% in the Canadian population, and up to 16% in some adult populations in the United States. Sinusitis is associated with a major societal health care burden, costing billions of dollars a year in North America. The medical treatment of CRS includes topical saline and corticosteroid sprays, systemic steroids and antimicrobials. Specifically, sinonasal saline irrigation is a safe, nonpharmacologic treatment, and an important and efficacious component in the management of CRS. Sinonasal saline irrigation can vary by concentration (e.g. hypertonic, isotonic, hypotonic), pressure (e.g. passive or active), and volume (e.g. high and low).
A recent evidence-based review by Rudmik et al. recommended sinonasal saline irrigation in the early postoperative period following endoscopic sinus surgery. Although 'daily' sinonasal saline irrigations are recommended, the ideal frequency is unknown since there have been no studies evaluating this topic.
This is a prospective, randomized, single blind study evaluating the subjective and objective outcomes of different sinonasal saline irrigation frequencies in patients who receive ESS for medically refractory CRS. Both disease-specific quality of life (QoL) and endoscopy scores will be measured at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 2 months postoperatively. The expected total number of patients to be enrolled in this study is approximately 75 (25 per arm), with a planned completion time of two years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Frequency: Once Daily
Patients will use high volume saline irrigation once daily post operatively.
High Volume Saline Irrigation
High volume saline irrigation (240 ml)
Frequency: Twice Daily
Patients will use high volume saline irrigation twice daily post operatively.
High Volume Saline Irrigation
High volume saline irrigation (240 ml)
Frequency: Three Times Daily
Patients will use high volume saline irrigation three times daily post operatively.
High Volume Saline Irrigation
High volume saline irrigation (240 ml)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High Volume Saline Irrigation
High volume saline irrigation (240 ml)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Documented failed medical treatment of CRS
* Planned ESS for the treatment of CRS
* Able to read and understand English
Exclusion Criteria
* Cystic Fibrosis
* Diagnosed immotile cilia syndrome
* Diagnosed immunodeficiency syndrome
* Diagnosed fungal sinusitis
* Sinonasal tumours or obstructive lesions
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr. Luke Rudmik
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Luke Rudmik
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Luke Rudmik, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Desrosiers M, Evans GA, Keith PK, Wright ED, Kaplan A, Bouchard J, Ciavarella A, Doyle PW, Javer AR, Leith ES, Mukherji A, Robert Schellenberg R, Small P, Witterick IJ. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 May;40 Suppl 2:S99-193. English, French.
Chen Y, Dales R, Lin M. The epidemiology of chronic rhinosinusitis in Canadians. Laryngoscope. 2003 Jul;113(7):1199-205. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200307000-00016.
Anand VK. Epidemiology and economic impact of rhinosinusitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2004 May;193:3-5. doi: 10.1177/00034894041130s502.
Ray NF, Baraniuk JN, Thamer M, Rinehart CS, Gergen PJ, Kaliner M, Josephs S, Pung YH. Healthcare expenditures for sinusitis in 1996: contributions of asthma, rhinitis, and other airway disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Mar;103(3 Pt 1):408-14. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70464-1.
Van Cauwenberge P, Watelet JB. Epidemiology of chronic rhinosinusitis. Thorax. 2000 Oct;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S20-1. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.suppl_2.s20. No abstract available.
Tomooka LT, Murphy C, Davidson TM. Clinical study and literature review of nasal irrigation. Laryngoscope. 2000 Jul;110(7):1189-93. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200007000-00023.
Rabago D, Zgierska A, Mundt M, Barrett B, Bobula J, Maberry R. Efficacy of daily hypertonic saline nasal irrigation among patients with sinusitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Fam Pract. 2002 Dec;51(12):1049-55.
Meltzer EO, Hamilos DL. Rhinosinusitis diagnosis and management for the clinician: a synopsis of recent consensus guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 May;86(5):427-43. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0392. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
Morley AD, Sharp HR. A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best? Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Apr;31(2):103-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01155.x.
Wright ED, Agrawal S. Impact of perioperative systemic steroids on surgical outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis: evaluation with the novel Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) scoring system. Laryngoscope. 2007 Nov;117(11 Pt 2 Suppl 115):1-28. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31814842f8.
Hopkins C, Browne JP, Slack R, Lund V, Brown P. The Lund-Mackay staging system for chronic rhinosinusitis: how is it used and what does it predict? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;137(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.02.004.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SIESS-2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id