Trial Outcomes & Findings for Investigation of Pain During Subcutaneous Injections With Different Injection Speed and Volume Combinations (NCT NCT01680328)

NCT ID: NCT01680328

Last Updated: 2017-03-03

Results Overview

Calculated as the least square mean estimate of the difference in injection pain on a VAS (mm) between different factor levels corresponding to injection region, injection volume and injection speed (pain was assessed using an electronic VAS consisting of a 100 mm line where 0 mm corresponded to no pain and 100 mm corresponded to worst pain. After each injection, the subjects rated their pain perception at the electronic VAS by marking the 100 mm line).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1

Target enrollment

82 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

1 minute (±30 sec) after each injection

Results posted on

2017-03-03

Participant Flow

The trial was conducted at a single site in Germany at a single visit.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
All Participants
Subjects received 19 subcutaneous (s.c) injections. Of the 19 injections, 13 were in the abdomen and 6 in the thighs. Of the 13 injections in the abdomen, 1 was a needle insertion and 12 were combinations of the 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) and 3 injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s). Of the 6 injections in the thigh, 1 was a needle insertion and 5 were selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450). Except for the 2 needle insertions, sodium chloride 0.9% solution was injected.
Overall Study
STARTED
82
Overall Study
Subjects Missing Injections
2
Overall Study
COMPLETED
80
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Investigation of Pain During Subcutaneous Injections With Different Injection Speed and Volume Combinations

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
All Participants
n=82 Participants
Subjects received 19 subcutaneous (s.c) injections. Of the 19 injections, 13 were in the abdomen and 6 in the thighs. Of the 13 injections in the abdomen, 1 was a needle insertion and 12 were combinations of the 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) and 3 injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s). Of the 6 injections in the thigh, 1 was a needle insertion and 5 were selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450). Except for the 2 needle insertions, sodium chloride 0.9% solution was injected.
Age, Continuous
54.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 • n=5 Participants
Gender
Female
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
Gender
Male
50 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 minute (±30 sec) after each injection

Population: All randomised subjects receiving at least one injection (possibly needle insertion only) were included in the full analysis set. A total of 4 subjects did not contribute to the analysis due to missing injections (2) and missing VAS evaluation (2).

Calculated as the least square mean estimate of the difference in injection pain on a VAS (mm) between different factor levels corresponding to injection region, injection volume and injection speed (pain was assessed using an electronic VAS consisting of a 100 mm line where 0 mm corresponded to no pain and 100 mm corresponded to worst pain. After each injection, the subjects rated their pain perception at the electronic VAS by marking the 100 mm line).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Thighs: Injection Region-5 s.c Injections+1 Needle Insertion
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in each subject for the 5 s.c injections+1 needle insertion administered in the thighs.
Abdomen: Injection Region-12 s.c Injections+1 Needle Insertion
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in each subject for the 12 s.c injections+1 needle insertion administered in the abdomen.
Injection Volume 1600 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 1200 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 800 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 400 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 450 μL/s
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 300 μL/s
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 150 μL/s
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Pain (VAS mm)
Needle insertion
20.0 mm
Standard Deviation 24.2
12.8 mm
Standard Deviation 16.3
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
Injection Pain (VAS mm)
Injection speed at 150 μL/s; Abdomen
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
20.9 mm
Standard Deviation 24.4
15.7 mm
Standard Deviation 20.2
11.6 mm
Standard Deviation 15.7
14.5 mm
Standard Deviation 17.3
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
No summary statistics done for this combination
Injection Pain (VAS mm)
Injection speed at 300 μL/s; Abdomen
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
17.2 mm
Standard Deviation 22.5
20.1 mm
Standard Deviation 25.3
13.7 mm
Standard Deviation 17.1
14.8 mm
Standard Deviation 18.1
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
No summary statistics done for this combination
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
Injection Pain (VAS mm)
Injection speed at 450 μL/s; Abdomen
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
21.1 mm
Standard Deviation 24.8
14.9 mm
Standard Deviation 16.9
14.8 mm
Standard Deviation 18.9
12.4 mm
Standard Deviation 15.5
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
No summary statistics done for this combination
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
Injection Pain (VAS mm)
Injection volume of 400 μL; Thighs
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
No summary statistics done for this combination
20.9 mm
Standard Deviation 24.8
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
22.9 mm
Standard Deviation 25.9
Injection Pain (VAS mm)
Injection volume of 800 μL; Thighs
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
No summary statistics done for this combination
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
23.2 mm
Standard Deviation 24.5
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
Injection Pain (VAS mm)
Injection volume of 1600 μL; Thighs
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
No summary statistics done for this combination
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
31.1 mm
Standard Deviation 28.5
NA mm
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
31.5 mm
Standard Deviation 28.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 minute (±30 seconds) after each injection

Population: All randomised subjects receiving at least one injection (possibly needle insertion only) were included in the full analysis set.

Acceptance of pain was rated subjectively as yes or no by the subject after each injection.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Thighs: Injection Region-5 s.c Injections+1 Needle Insertion
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in each subject for the 5 s.c injections+1 needle insertion administered in the thighs.
Abdomen: Injection Region-12 s.c Injections+1 Needle Insertion
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in each subject for the 12 s.c injections+1 needle insertion administered in the abdomen.
Injection Volume 1600 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 1200 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 800 μL
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 400 μL
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 450 μL/s
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 300 μL/s
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 150 μL/s
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Acceptance of Injection Pain After Injection of Different Volumes.
Yes
334 scores
218 scores
303 scores
368 scores
Acceptance of Injection Pain After Injection of Different Volumes.
No
75 scores
28 scores
25 scores
41 scores

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 minute (±30 sec) after each injection

Population: All randomised subjects receiving at least one injection (possibly needle insertion only) were included in the full analysis set.

Acceptance of pain was rated subjectively as yes or no by the subject after each injection.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Thighs: Injection Region-5 s.c Injections+1 Needle Insertion
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in each subject for the 5 s.c injections+1 needle insertion administered in the thighs.
Abdomen: Injection Region-12 s.c Injections+1 Needle Insertion
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in each subject for the 12 s.c injections+1 needle insertion administered in the abdomen.
Injection Volume 1600 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 1200 μL
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 800 μL
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 400 μL
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 450 μL/s
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 300 μL/s
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 150 μL/s
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Acceptance of Injection Pain After Injection at Different Speeds.
Yes
432 scores
365 scores
426 scores
Acceptance of Injection Pain After Injection at Different Speeds.
No
59 scores
44 scores
66 scores

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 minute (±30 seconds) after each injection

Population: All randomised subjects receiving at least one injection (possibly needle insertion only) were included in the full analysis set.

Acceptance of pain was rated subjectively as yes or no by the subject after each injection.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Thighs: Injection Region-5 s.c Injections+1 Needle Insertion
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in each subject for the 5 s.c injections+1 needle insertion administered in the thighs.
Abdomen: Injection Region-12 s.c Injections+1 Needle Insertion
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in each subject for the 12 s.c injections+1 needle insertion administered in the abdomen.
Injection Volume 1600 μL
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 1200 μL
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 800 μL
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 400 μL
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 450 μL/s
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 300 μL/s
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 150 μL/s
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Acceptance of Injection Pain After Injection in the Thighs Versus Abdomen.
Yes
390 scores
978 scores
Acceptance of Injection Pain After Injection in the Thighs Versus Abdomen.
No
101 scores
87 scores

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 minutes (±30sec) after each injection

Population: All randomised subjects receiving at least one injection (possibly needle insertion only) were included in the full analysis set. One subject did not contribute to the analysis due to missing injection.

Backflow was measured after each injection by placing a filter paper over the injection site after the injection was given and until the liquid was absorbed. The size of the wet spot on the filter paper served as a measure of the backflow. The treatment effect on backflow was calculated as the least square mean estimate of the difference in backflow after injection in the abdomen at different volume and speed combinations.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Thighs: Injection Region-5 s.c Injections+1 Needle Insertion
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in each subject for the 5 s.c injections+1 needle insertion administered in the thighs.
Abdomen: Injection Region-12 s.c Injections+1 Needle Insertion
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in each subject for the 12 s.c injections+1 needle insertion administered in the abdomen.
Injection Volume 1600 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 1200 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 800 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 400 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 450 μL/s
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 300 μL/s
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 150 μL/s
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Estimated Mean Differences in the Volume of Backflow (uL) in the Abdomen After Different Injection Volumes and Speeds as Compared to Needle Insertion
Injection speed at 300 μL/s
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
1.4 mcL
Standard Deviation 2.9
0.8 mcL
Standard Deviation 1.9
0.5 mcL
Standard Deviation 1.6
0.4 mcL
Standard Deviation 1.3
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
No summary statistics done for this combination
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
Estimated Mean Differences in the Volume of Backflow (uL) in the Abdomen After Different Injection Volumes and Speeds as Compared to Needle Insertion
Injection speed at 450 μL/s
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
0.6 mcL
Standard Deviation 1.1
1.1 mcL
Standard Deviation 4.6
0.5 mcL
Standard Deviation 1.3
0.9 mcL
Standard Deviation 2.7
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
No summary statistics done for this combination
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
Estimated Mean Differences in the Volume of Backflow (uL) in the Abdomen After Different Injection Volumes and Speeds as Compared to Needle Insertion
Needle insertion
0.0 mcL
Standard Deviation 0.1
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
Estimated Mean Differences in the Volume of Backflow (uL) in the Abdomen After Different Injection Volumes and Speeds as Compared to Needle Insertion
Injection speed at 150 μL/s
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
2.3 mcL
Standard Deviation 5.1
0.9 mcL
Standard Deviation 1.9
0.5 mcL
Standard Deviation 1.4
0.6 mcL
Standard Deviation 1.8
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
No summary statistics done for this combination

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 minutes (±30sec) after each injection

Population: All randomised subjects receiving at least one injection (possibly needle insertion only) were included in the full analysis set. One subject did not contribute to the analysis due to missing injection.

Backflow was measured after each injection by placing a filter paper over the injection site after the injection was given and until the liquid was absorbed. The size of the wet spot on the filter paper served as a measure of the backflow. The treatment effect on backflow was calculated as the least square mean estimate of the difference in backflow after injection in the abdomen at different volume and speed combinations.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Thighs: Injection Region-5 s.c Injections+1 Needle Insertion
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in each subject for the 5 s.c injections+1 needle insertion administered in the thighs.
Abdomen: Injection Region-12 s.c Injections+1 Needle Insertion
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in each subject for the 12 s.c injections+1 needle insertion administered in the abdomen.
Injection Volume 1600 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 1200 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 800 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Volume 400 μL
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 450 μL/s
n=82 Participants
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 300 μL/s
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Injection Speed at 150 μL/s
Pain (VAS) was assessed in the abdomen following administration of 4 different injection volumes (400, 800, 1200 and 1600 µL) at 3 different injection speeds (150, 300 and 450 µL/s); and in the thighs following administration of the selected combinations of injection volume (µL) and speed (µL/s) (400/150, 400/450, 800/300, 1600/150, 1600/450).
Estimated Mean Differences in the Volume of Backflow (uL) in the Thighs After Different Injection Volumes and Speeds as Compared to Needle Insertion
Needle insertion
0.8 mcL
Standard Deviation 5.6
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
Estimated Mean Differences in the Volume of Backflow (uL) in the Thighs After Different Injection Volumes and Speeds as Compared to Needle Insertion
Injection speed at 150 μL/s
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
5.6 mcL
Standard Deviation 8.6
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
1.0 mcL
Standard Deviation 3.1
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
No summary statistics done for this combination.
Estimated Mean Differences in the Volume of Backflow (uL) in the Thighs After Different Injection Volumes and Speeds as Compared to Needle Insertion
Injection speed at 300 μL/s
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
2.3 mcL
Standard Deviation 7.9
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Summary statistics is same as presented in Injection speed at 300 μL/s x Injection Volume 800 μL.
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
Estimated Mean Differences in the Volume of Backflow (uL) in the Thighs After Different Injection Volumes and Speeds as Compared to Needle Insertion
Injection speed at 450 μL/s
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
2.5 mcL
Standard Deviation 4.6
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
1.6 mcL
Standard Deviation 4.9
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
No summary statistics done for this combination.
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered
NA mcL
Standard Deviation NA
Not administered

Adverse Events

All Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Public Access to Clinical Trials

Novo Nordisk A/S

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Novo Nordisk reserves the right to defer the release of data until specified milestones are reached, for example when the clinical trial report is available. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER